Cargando…

Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilton, Bryn, Tempest-Mitchell, Jennifer, Davies, Benjamin, Kotter, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
_version_ 1783381046857826304
author Hilton, Bryn
Tempest-Mitchell, Jennifer
Davies, Benjamin
Kotter, Mark
author_facet Hilton, Bryn
Tempest-Mitchell, Jennifer
Davies, Benjamin
Kotter, Mark
author_sort Hilton, Bryn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS: Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION: DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6296508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62965082018-12-28 Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes Hilton, Bryn Tempest-Mitchell, Jennifer Davies, Benjamin Kotter, Mark PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS: Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION: DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery. Public Library of Science 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6296508/ /pubmed/30557368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709 Text en © 2018 Hilton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hilton, Bryn
Tempest-Mitchell, Jennifer
Davies, Benjamin
Kotter, Mark
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
title Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
title_full Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
title_short Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
title_sort assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
work_keys_str_mv AT hiltonbryn assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
AT tempestmitchelljennifer assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
AT daviesbenjamin assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
AT kottermark assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes