Cargando…

Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, François, Feuvret, Loïc, Bresson, Damien, Guichard, Jean-Pierre, El Zein, Sophie, Bernat, Anne-Laure, Labidi, Moujahed, Calugaru, Valentin, Froelich, Sébastien, Herman, Philippe, Verillaud, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208786
_version_ 1783381056011894784
author Simon, François
Feuvret, Loïc
Bresson, Damien
Guichard, Jean-Pierre
El Zein, Sophie
Bernat, Anne-Laure
Labidi, Moujahed
Calugaru, Valentin
Froelich, Sébastien
Herman, Philippe
Verillaud, Benjamin
author_facet Simon, François
Feuvret, Loïc
Bresson, Damien
Guichard, Jean-Pierre
El Zein, Sophie
Bernat, Anne-Laure
Labidi, Moujahed
Calugaru, Valentin
Froelich, Sébastien
Herman, Philippe
Verillaud, Benjamin
author_sort Simon, François
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of surgery only vs surgery and adjuvant proton therapy, in terms of survival and treatment adverse effects, based on a retrospective series. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study at a tertiary care centre. All patients treated for a skull base grade I and II chondrosarcoma were included. We collected data concerning surgical and proton therapy treatment and up-to-date follow-up, including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scores. RESULTS: 47 patients (23M/24F) were operated on between 2002 and 2015; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years-old (10–85). Petroclival and anterior skull base locations were found in 34 and 13 patients, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 17 cases (36%) and partial in 30 (64%). Adjuvant proton therapy (mean total dose 70 GyRBE,1.8 GyRBE/day) was administered in 23 cases. Overall mean follow-up was 91 months (7–182). Of the patients treated by surgery only, 8 (34%) experienced residual tumour progression (mean delay 51 months) and 5 received second-line proton therapy. Adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of relapse (11%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in 10-year disease specific survival between patients initially treated with or without adjuvant proton therapy (100% vs 89.8%, p = 0.14). Difference in high-grade toxicity was not statistically significant between patients in both groups (25% (7) vs 11% (5), p = 0.10). The most frequent adverse effect of proton therapy was sensorineural hearing loss (39%). CONCLUSION: Long-term disease specific survival was not significantly lower in patients without adjuvant proton therapy, but they experienced less adverse effects. We believe a surgery only strategy could be discussed, delaying as much as possible proton therapy in cases of relapse. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this more conservative strategy in skull base chondrosarcoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6296545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62965452018-12-28 Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study Simon, François Feuvret, Loïc Bresson, Damien Guichard, Jean-Pierre El Zein, Sophie Bernat, Anne-Laure Labidi, Moujahed Calugaru, Valentin Froelich, Sébastien Herman, Philippe Verillaud, Benjamin PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of surgery only vs surgery and adjuvant proton therapy, in terms of survival and treatment adverse effects, based on a retrospective series. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study at a tertiary care centre. All patients treated for a skull base grade I and II chondrosarcoma were included. We collected data concerning surgical and proton therapy treatment and up-to-date follow-up, including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scores. RESULTS: 47 patients (23M/24F) were operated on between 2002 and 2015; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years-old (10–85). Petroclival and anterior skull base locations were found in 34 and 13 patients, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 17 cases (36%) and partial in 30 (64%). Adjuvant proton therapy (mean total dose 70 GyRBE,1.8 GyRBE/day) was administered in 23 cases. Overall mean follow-up was 91 months (7–182). Of the patients treated by surgery only, 8 (34%) experienced residual tumour progression (mean delay 51 months) and 5 received second-line proton therapy. Adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of relapse (11%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in 10-year disease specific survival between patients initially treated with or without adjuvant proton therapy (100% vs 89.8%, p = 0.14). Difference in high-grade toxicity was not statistically significant between patients in both groups (25% (7) vs 11% (5), p = 0.10). The most frequent adverse effect of proton therapy was sensorineural hearing loss (39%). CONCLUSION: Long-term disease specific survival was not significantly lower in patients without adjuvant proton therapy, but they experienced less adverse effects. We believe a surgery only strategy could be discussed, delaying as much as possible proton therapy in cases of relapse. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this more conservative strategy in skull base chondrosarcoma. Public Library of Science 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6296545/ /pubmed/30557382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208786 Text en © 2018 Simon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simon, François
Feuvret, Loïc
Bresson, Damien
Guichard, Jean-Pierre
El Zein, Sophie
Bernat, Anne-Laure
Labidi, Moujahed
Calugaru, Valentin
Froelich, Sébastien
Herman, Philippe
Verillaud, Benjamin
Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
title Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
title_full Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
title_fullStr Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
title_short Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
title_sort surgery and protontherapy in grade i and ii skull base chondrosarcoma: a comparative retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208786
work_keys_str_mv AT simonfrancois surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT feuvretloic surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT bressondamien surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT guichardjeanpierre surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT elzeinsophie surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT bernatannelaure surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT labidimoujahed surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT calugaruvalentin surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT froelichsebastien surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT hermanphilippe surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT verillaudbenjamin surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy