Cargando…
Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study
OBJECTIVE: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208786 |
_version_ | 1783381056011894784 |
---|---|
author | Simon, François Feuvret, Loïc Bresson, Damien Guichard, Jean-Pierre El Zein, Sophie Bernat, Anne-Laure Labidi, Moujahed Calugaru, Valentin Froelich, Sébastien Herman, Philippe Verillaud, Benjamin |
author_facet | Simon, François Feuvret, Loïc Bresson, Damien Guichard, Jean-Pierre El Zein, Sophie Bernat, Anne-Laure Labidi, Moujahed Calugaru, Valentin Froelich, Sébastien Herman, Philippe Verillaud, Benjamin |
author_sort | Simon, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of surgery only vs surgery and adjuvant proton therapy, in terms of survival and treatment adverse effects, based on a retrospective series. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study at a tertiary care centre. All patients treated for a skull base grade I and II chondrosarcoma were included. We collected data concerning surgical and proton therapy treatment and up-to-date follow-up, including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scores. RESULTS: 47 patients (23M/24F) were operated on between 2002 and 2015; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years-old (10–85). Petroclival and anterior skull base locations were found in 34 and 13 patients, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 17 cases (36%) and partial in 30 (64%). Adjuvant proton therapy (mean total dose 70 GyRBE,1.8 GyRBE/day) was administered in 23 cases. Overall mean follow-up was 91 months (7–182). Of the patients treated by surgery only, 8 (34%) experienced residual tumour progression (mean delay 51 months) and 5 received second-line proton therapy. Adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of relapse (11%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in 10-year disease specific survival between patients initially treated with or without adjuvant proton therapy (100% vs 89.8%, p = 0.14). Difference in high-grade toxicity was not statistically significant between patients in both groups (25% (7) vs 11% (5), p = 0.10). The most frequent adverse effect of proton therapy was sensorineural hearing loss (39%). CONCLUSION: Long-term disease specific survival was not significantly lower in patients without adjuvant proton therapy, but they experienced less adverse effects. We believe a surgery only strategy could be discussed, delaying as much as possible proton therapy in cases of relapse. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this more conservative strategy in skull base chondrosarcoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6296545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62965452018-12-28 Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study Simon, François Feuvret, Loïc Bresson, Damien Guichard, Jean-Pierre El Zein, Sophie Bernat, Anne-Laure Labidi, Moujahed Calugaru, Valentin Froelich, Sébastien Herman, Philippe Verillaud, Benjamin PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of surgery only vs surgery and adjuvant proton therapy, in terms of survival and treatment adverse effects, based on a retrospective series. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study at a tertiary care centre. All patients treated for a skull base grade I and II chondrosarcoma were included. We collected data concerning surgical and proton therapy treatment and up-to-date follow-up, including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scores. RESULTS: 47 patients (23M/24F) were operated on between 2002 and 2015; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years-old (10–85). Petroclival and anterior skull base locations were found in 34 and 13 patients, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 17 cases (36%) and partial in 30 (64%). Adjuvant proton therapy (mean total dose 70 GyRBE,1.8 GyRBE/day) was administered in 23 cases. Overall mean follow-up was 91 months (7–182). Of the patients treated by surgery only, 8 (34%) experienced residual tumour progression (mean delay 51 months) and 5 received second-line proton therapy. Adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of relapse (11%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in 10-year disease specific survival between patients initially treated with or without adjuvant proton therapy (100% vs 89.8%, p = 0.14). Difference in high-grade toxicity was not statistically significant between patients in both groups (25% (7) vs 11% (5), p = 0.10). The most frequent adverse effect of proton therapy was sensorineural hearing loss (39%). CONCLUSION: Long-term disease specific survival was not significantly lower in patients without adjuvant proton therapy, but they experienced less adverse effects. We believe a surgery only strategy could be discussed, delaying as much as possible proton therapy in cases of relapse. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this more conservative strategy in skull base chondrosarcoma. Public Library of Science 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6296545/ /pubmed/30557382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208786 Text en © 2018 Simon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Simon, François Feuvret, Loïc Bresson, Damien Guichard, Jean-Pierre El Zein, Sophie Bernat, Anne-Laure Labidi, Moujahed Calugaru, Valentin Froelich, Sébastien Herman, Philippe Verillaud, Benjamin Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study |
title | Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study |
title_full | Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study |
title_short | Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study |
title_sort | surgery and protontherapy in grade i and ii skull base chondrosarcoma: a comparative retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonfrancois surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT feuvretloic surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT bressondamien surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT guichardjeanpierre surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT elzeinsophie surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT bernatannelaure surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT labidimoujahed surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT calugaruvalentin surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT froelichsebastien surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT hermanphilippe surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy AT verillaudbenjamin surgeryandprotontherapyingradeiandiiskullbasechondrosarcomaacomparativeretrospectivestudy |