Cargando…

Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain

INTRODUCTION: We compared performance of nine risk scores for coronary heart disease (CHD) among patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated chest pain of possible coronary origin. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of adult patients presenting with chest pai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wamala, Henry, Aggarwal, Leena, Bernard, Anne, Scott, Ian A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30588062
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S183583
_version_ 1783381096156626944
author Wamala, Henry
Aggarwal, Leena
Bernard, Anne
Scott, Ian A
author_facet Wamala, Henry
Aggarwal, Leena
Bernard, Anne
Scott, Ian A
author_sort Wamala, Henry
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We compared performance of nine risk scores for coronary heart disease (CHD) among patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated chest pain of possible coronary origin. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of adult patients presenting with chest pain to atertiary hospital ED with no electrocardiographs or troponin results diagnostic of ischemic chest pain (ICP) or acute coronary syndrome at ED presentation, and no clearly evident noncoronary diagnosis. Risk scores were applied using cut-points distinguishing low- from high-risk patients according to discharge diagnosis of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) or ICP, respectively. A lower odds ratio (OR) for ICP denoted lower risk for ICP. Score performance was compared using area under receiver–operator characteristic curves (AUC) and predictive values. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients were studied, of whom 123 (30.7%) had ICP as final diagnosis. Among the nine risk scores, those with greatest ability to detect low-risk patients were The North American Chest Pain Rule (NACPR) score (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.27–0.46); History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score (OR=0.43; 95% CI=0.35–0.52); and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score (OR=0.49; 95% CI=0.41–0.58). Discrimination between patients with NCCP and those with ICP was greatest for HEART score (AUC=0.82; 95% CI=0.78–0.86) and lowest for Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol to Assess Patients with Chest Pain Symptoms Using Contemporary Troponins (ADAPT) score (AUC=0.63; 95% CI=0.58–0.69). In excluding ICP, ADAPT had negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (miss rate 0%) but classified only 1.7% of patients as low risk, compared to NACPR with NPV 98% (miss rate 2%), classifying 10.2% as low risk, and HEART with NPV 94% (miss rate 6%), classifying 32.4% as low risk. CONCLUSION: The NACPR risk score maximized yield of low-risk patients with lowest miss rate for ICP, while HEART score classified highest proportion of low-risk patients but with a higher miss rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6296689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62966892018-12-26 Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain Wamala, Henry Aggarwal, Leena Bernard, Anne Scott, Ian A Int J Gen Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: We compared performance of nine risk scores for coronary heart disease (CHD) among patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated chest pain of possible coronary origin. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of adult patients presenting with chest pain to atertiary hospital ED with no electrocardiographs or troponin results diagnostic of ischemic chest pain (ICP) or acute coronary syndrome at ED presentation, and no clearly evident noncoronary diagnosis. Risk scores were applied using cut-points distinguishing low- from high-risk patients according to discharge diagnosis of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) or ICP, respectively. A lower odds ratio (OR) for ICP denoted lower risk for ICP. Score performance was compared using area under receiver–operator characteristic curves (AUC) and predictive values. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients were studied, of whom 123 (30.7%) had ICP as final diagnosis. Among the nine risk scores, those with greatest ability to detect low-risk patients were The North American Chest Pain Rule (NACPR) score (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.27–0.46); History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score (OR=0.43; 95% CI=0.35–0.52); and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score (OR=0.49; 95% CI=0.41–0.58). Discrimination between patients with NCCP and those with ICP was greatest for HEART score (AUC=0.82; 95% CI=0.78–0.86) and lowest for Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol to Assess Patients with Chest Pain Symptoms Using Contemporary Troponins (ADAPT) score (AUC=0.63; 95% CI=0.58–0.69). In excluding ICP, ADAPT had negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (miss rate 0%) but classified only 1.7% of patients as low risk, compared to NACPR with NPV 98% (miss rate 2%), classifying 10.2% as low risk, and HEART with NPV 94% (miss rate 6%), classifying 32.4% as low risk. CONCLUSION: The NACPR risk score maximized yield of low-risk patients with lowest miss rate for ICP, while HEART score classified highest proportion of low-risk patients but with a higher miss rate. Dove Medical Press 2018-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6296689/ /pubmed/30588062 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S183583 Text en © 2018 Wamala et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wamala, Henry
Aggarwal, Leena
Bernard, Anne
Scott, Ian A
Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
title Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
title_full Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
title_fullStr Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
title_short Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
title_sort comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30588062
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S183583
work_keys_str_mv AT wamalahenry comparisonofninecoronaryriskscoresinevaluatingpatientspresentingtohospitalwithundifferentiatedchestpain
AT aggarwalleena comparisonofninecoronaryriskscoresinevaluatingpatientspresentingtohospitalwithundifferentiatedchestpain
AT bernardanne comparisonofninecoronaryriskscoresinevaluatingpatientspresentingtohospitalwithundifferentiatedchestpain
AT scottiana comparisonofninecoronaryriskscoresinevaluatingpatientspresentingtohospitalwithundifferentiatedchestpain