Cargando…
Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study
BACKGROUND: The clinical interest of using bubble humidification of oxygen remains controversial. This study was designed to further explore whether delivering dry oxygen instead of bubble-moistened oxygen had an impact on discomfort of ICU patients. METHODS: This randomized multicenter non-inferior...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9 |
_version_ | 1783381129199353856 |
---|---|
author | Poiroux, Laurent Piquilloud, Lise Seegers, Valérie Le Roy, Cyril Colonval, Karine Agasse, Carole Zinzoni, Vanessa Hodebert, Vanessa Cambonie, Alexandre Saletes, Josselin Bourgeon, Irma Beloncle, François Mercat, Alain |
author_facet | Poiroux, Laurent Piquilloud, Lise Seegers, Valérie Le Roy, Cyril Colonval, Karine Agasse, Carole Zinzoni, Vanessa Hodebert, Vanessa Cambonie, Alexandre Saletes, Josselin Bourgeon, Irma Beloncle, François Mercat, Alain |
author_sort | Poiroux, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical interest of using bubble humidification of oxygen remains controversial. This study was designed to further explore whether delivering dry oxygen instead of bubble-moistened oxygen had an impact on discomfort of ICU patients. METHODS: This randomized multicenter non-inferiority open trial included patients admitted in intensive care unit and receiving oxygen. Any patient receiving non-humidified oxygen (between 0 and 15 L/min) for less than 2 h could participate in the study. Randomization was stratified based on the flow rate at inclusion (less or more than 4 L/min). Discomfort was assessed 6–8 and 24 h after inclusion using a dedicated 15-item scale (quoted from 0 to 150). RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-four ICU patients receiving non-humidified oxygen were randomized either in the humidified (HO) (n = 172), using bubble humidifiers, or in the non-humidified (NHO) (n = 182) arms. In modified intention-to-treat analysis at H6–H8, the 15-item score was 26.6 ± 19.4 and 29.8 ± 23.4 in the HO and NHO groups, respectively. The absolute difference between scores in both groups was 3.2 [90% CI 0.0; + 6.5] for a non-inferiority margin of 5.3, meaning that the non-inferiority analysis was not conclusive. This was also true for the subgroups of patients receiving either less or more than 4 L/min of oxygen. At H24, using NHO was not inferior compared to HO in the general population and in the subgroup of patients receiving 4 L/min or less of oxygen. However, for patients receiving more than 4 L/min, a post hoc superiority analysis suggested that patients receiving dry oxygen were less comfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen therapy-related discomfort was low. Dry oxygen could not be demonstrated as non-inferior compared to bubble-moistened oxygen after 6–8 h of oxygen administration. At 24 h, dry oxygen was non-inferior compared to bubble-humidified oxygen for flows below 4 L/min. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6297119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62971192019-01-03 Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study Poiroux, Laurent Piquilloud, Lise Seegers, Valérie Le Roy, Cyril Colonval, Karine Agasse, Carole Zinzoni, Vanessa Hodebert, Vanessa Cambonie, Alexandre Saletes, Josselin Bourgeon, Irma Beloncle, François Mercat, Alain Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The clinical interest of using bubble humidification of oxygen remains controversial. This study was designed to further explore whether delivering dry oxygen instead of bubble-moistened oxygen had an impact on discomfort of ICU patients. METHODS: This randomized multicenter non-inferiority open trial included patients admitted in intensive care unit and receiving oxygen. Any patient receiving non-humidified oxygen (between 0 and 15 L/min) for less than 2 h could participate in the study. Randomization was stratified based on the flow rate at inclusion (less or more than 4 L/min). Discomfort was assessed 6–8 and 24 h after inclusion using a dedicated 15-item scale (quoted from 0 to 150). RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-four ICU patients receiving non-humidified oxygen were randomized either in the humidified (HO) (n = 172), using bubble humidifiers, or in the non-humidified (NHO) (n = 182) arms. In modified intention-to-treat analysis at H6–H8, the 15-item score was 26.6 ± 19.4 and 29.8 ± 23.4 in the HO and NHO groups, respectively. The absolute difference between scores in both groups was 3.2 [90% CI 0.0; + 6.5] for a non-inferiority margin of 5.3, meaning that the non-inferiority analysis was not conclusive. This was also true for the subgroups of patients receiving either less or more than 4 L/min of oxygen. At H24, using NHO was not inferior compared to HO in the general population and in the subgroup of patients receiving 4 L/min or less of oxygen. However, for patients receiving more than 4 L/min, a post hoc superiority analysis suggested that patients receiving dry oxygen were less comfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen therapy-related discomfort was low. Dry oxygen could not be demonstrated as non-inferior compared to bubble-moistened oxygen after 6–8 h of oxygen administration. At 24 h, dry oxygen was non-inferior compared to bubble-humidified oxygen for flows below 4 L/min. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6297119/ /pubmed/30560440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Poiroux, Laurent Piquilloud, Lise Seegers, Valérie Le Roy, Cyril Colonval, Karine Agasse, Carole Zinzoni, Vanessa Hodebert, Vanessa Cambonie, Alexandre Saletes, Josselin Bourgeon, Irma Beloncle, François Mercat, Alain Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
title | Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
title_full | Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
title_fullStr | Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
title_short | Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
title_sort | effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poirouxlaurent effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT piquilloudlise effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT seegersvalerie effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT leroycyril effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT colonvalkarine effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT agassecarole effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT zinzonivanessa effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT hodebertvanessa effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT camboniealexandre effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT saletesjosselin effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT bourgeonirma effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT belonclefrancois effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT mercatalain effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy AT effectoncomfortofadministeringbubblehumidifiedordryoxygentheoxyreanoninferiorityrandomizedstudy |