Cargando…

Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire

Background: There is a clear need for a standardized definition of recovery from eating disorders (EDs) and for self-report instruments to assess where individuals with an ED are situated at a given point of time along their process of illness and recovery. It has been acknowledged that psychologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachner-Melman, Rachel, Lev-Ari, Lilac, Zohar, Ada H., Lev, Shay Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02456
_version_ 1783381221374427136
author Bachner-Melman, Rachel
Lev-Ari, Lilac
Zohar, Ada H.
Lev, Shay Lee
author_facet Bachner-Melman, Rachel
Lev-Ari, Lilac
Zohar, Ada H.
Lev, Shay Lee
author_sort Bachner-Melman, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Background: There is a clear need for a standardized definition of recovery from eating disorders (EDs) and for self-report instruments to assess where individuals with an ED are situated at a given point of time along their process of illness and recovery. It has been acknowledged that psychological and cognitive symptoms are important to recovery in addition to physical and behavioral indices. This study proposes a 28-item multidimensional questionnaire encompassing the main features of recovery from ED, derived from the endorsement of different criteria by people with a lifetime ED diagnosis, family members and ED clinicians. Methods: Participants were 213 volunteers over the age of 18 (118 people with a lifetime ED diagnosis, 58 healthy family members of people with EDs and 37 ED clinicians), who completed the ED-15 and indicated online how important they thought each of 56 criteria were for recovery from an ED. Results: Four factors were identified in an exploratory factor analysis: Lack of Symptomatic Behavior (LSB), Acceptance of Self and Body (ASB), Social and Emotional Connection (SEC), and Physical Health (PH). Confirmatory factor analysis using the seven highest loading items from each subscale confirmed the structure validity of a shortened version of this questionnaire, the Eating Disorders Recovery Endorsement Questionnaire (EDREQ), which had excellent goodness-of-fit indices. Despite a few between-group differences, there was general agreement that LSB was most salient to recovery, followed by ASB, SEC, and PH in that order. Conclusion: Despite the absence of a standardized definition of recovery from ED, there is a general consensus about its components. The EDREQ is a psychometrically sound questionnaire containing items that people with an ED history, their family members and therapists all define as important components of recovery. The inclusion of emotional and psychosocial aspects of recovery in addition to symptomatic and medical aspects is important to expand treatment goals and the concept of recovery from EDs beyond symptom relief and the absence of disease markers. As a clinical tool, the EDREQ stands to assist in setting and refining therapeutic goals throughout therapy, and in establishing standardized, comparable norms for recovery levels in research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6297874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62978742019-01-07 Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire Bachner-Melman, Rachel Lev-Ari, Lilac Zohar, Ada H. Lev, Shay Lee Front Psychol Psychology Background: There is a clear need for a standardized definition of recovery from eating disorders (EDs) and for self-report instruments to assess where individuals with an ED are situated at a given point of time along their process of illness and recovery. It has been acknowledged that psychological and cognitive symptoms are important to recovery in addition to physical and behavioral indices. This study proposes a 28-item multidimensional questionnaire encompassing the main features of recovery from ED, derived from the endorsement of different criteria by people with a lifetime ED diagnosis, family members and ED clinicians. Methods: Participants were 213 volunteers over the age of 18 (118 people with a lifetime ED diagnosis, 58 healthy family members of people with EDs and 37 ED clinicians), who completed the ED-15 and indicated online how important they thought each of 56 criteria were for recovery from an ED. Results: Four factors were identified in an exploratory factor analysis: Lack of Symptomatic Behavior (LSB), Acceptance of Self and Body (ASB), Social and Emotional Connection (SEC), and Physical Health (PH). Confirmatory factor analysis using the seven highest loading items from each subscale confirmed the structure validity of a shortened version of this questionnaire, the Eating Disorders Recovery Endorsement Questionnaire (EDREQ), which had excellent goodness-of-fit indices. Despite a few between-group differences, there was general agreement that LSB was most salient to recovery, followed by ASB, SEC, and PH in that order. Conclusion: Despite the absence of a standardized definition of recovery from ED, there is a general consensus about its components. The EDREQ is a psychometrically sound questionnaire containing items that people with an ED history, their family members and therapists all define as important components of recovery. The inclusion of emotional and psychosocial aspects of recovery in addition to symptomatic and medical aspects is important to expand treatment goals and the concept of recovery from EDs beyond symptom relief and the absence of disease markers. As a clinical tool, the EDREQ stands to assist in setting and refining therapeutic goals throughout therapy, and in establishing standardized, comparable norms for recovery levels in research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6297874/ /pubmed/30618916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02456 Text en Copyright © 2018 Bachner-Melman, Lev-Ari, Zohar and Lev. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bachner-Melman, Rachel
Lev-Ari, Lilac
Zohar, Ada H.
Lev, Shay Lee
Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire
title Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire
title_full Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire
title_fullStr Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire
title_short Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire
title_sort can recovery from an eating disorder be measured? toward a standardized questionnaire
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02456
work_keys_str_mv AT bachnermelmanrachel canrecoveryfromaneatingdisorderbemeasuredtowardastandardizedquestionnaire
AT levarililac canrecoveryfromaneatingdisorderbemeasuredtowardastandardizedquestionnaire
AT zoharadah canrecoveryfromaneatingdisorderbemeasuredtowardastandardizedquestionnaire
AT levshaylee canrecoveryfromaneatingdisorderbemeasuredtowardastandardizedquestionnaire