Cargando…
Cryptogenic Stroke: To Close a Patent Foramen Ovale or Not to Close?
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been shown to be highly prevalent in patients diagnosed with strokes of unknown cause, which are also called cryptogenic strokes (CSs). It has been a long-running controversy as to whether a PFO should be closed or not to prevent recurrent strokes in patients diagnos...
Autores principales: | Kottoor, Santhosh J, Arora, Rohit R |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179573518819476 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cryptogenic stroke over 60 years of age: should patent foramen ovale be closed?
por: Gaspardone, Achille, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: Integrated Management
por: Lucà, Fabiana, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Patent Foramen Ovale: Story Closed?
por: Köhrmann, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Multidisciplinary management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke/TIA
por: Mirzada, Naqibullah, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention
por: Yuan, Kristy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)