Cargando…

Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely available for use in musculoskeletal care. However, there is little research exploring the implementation of PROMs in clinical practice. This qualitative study explored chiropractors’ views on PROMs to identify any barriers and facilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmes, Michelle M., Bishop, Felicity L., Newell, David, Field, Jonathan, Lewith, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0219-6
_version_ 1783381232360357888
author Holmes, Michelle M.
Bishop, Felicity L.
Newell, David
Field, Jonathan
Lewith, George
author_facet Holmes, Michelle M.
Bishop, Felicity L.
Newell, David
Field, Jonathan
Lewith, George
author_sort Holmes, Michelle M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely available for use in musculoskeletal care. However, there is little research exploring the implementation of PROMs in clinical practice. This qualitative study explored chiropractors’ views on PROMs to identify any barriers and facilitators to implementing PROMs in chiropractic care and the training needs of chiropractors regarding the use of PROMs. METHODS: A qualitative study of chiropractors’ views on PROMs was undertaken as part of a larger project to address the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of PROM use in chiropractic clinics for patients with low back pain. Contact was made with chiropractors working in chiropractic companies with multiple clinic sites. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight chiropractors, either face-to-face at their place of work or over the telephone. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. The data were coded inductively by two authors. RESULTS: Chiropractors discussed their knowledge and engagement with PROMs in clinical practice, identifying reasons for their use, such as understanding clinic performance, clinical practice, and research. They also discussed how they used PROMs within their clinical practice and the benefits of using them with individual patients, for example during the consultation, identifying yellow flags, and tracking patient progress. Chiropractors voiced concerns about patient engagement with PROMs, questioning if patients find them burdensome, and the appropriate PROMs to use with patients with pain. Finally, chiropractors acknowledged the organisational barriers and facilitators to using PROMs within their practice, such as busy practices, electronic systems, and use of reception staff. CONCLUSIONS: Using participating chiropractors’ views of PROMs, the study identified barriers and facilitators to implementing PROMs in chiropractic care, such as clinician knowledge, engagement, and organisational concerns and identified the potential training needs of chiropractors regarding PROMs. The results from the study suggested chiropractors use PROMs with their individual patients, but PROMs should be meaningful to patients and chiropractors to improve engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6297946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62979462018-12-19 Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study Holmes, Michelle M. Bishop, Felicity L. Newell, David Field, Jonathan Lewith, George Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely available for use in musculoskeletal care. However, there is little research exploring the implementation of PROMs in clinical practice. This qualitative study explored chiropractors’ views on PROMs to identify any barriers and facilitators to implementing PROMs in chiropractic care and the training needs of chiropractors regarding the use of PROMs. METHODS: A qualitative study of chiropractors’ views on PROMs was undertaken as part of a larger project to address the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of PROM use in chiropractic clinics for patients with low back pain. Contact was made with chiropractors working in chiropractic companies with multiple clinic sites. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight chiropractors, either face-to-face at their place of work or over the telephone. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. The data were coded inductively by two authors. RESULTS: Chiropractors discussed their knowledge and engagement with PROMs in clinical practice, identifying reasons for their use, such as understanding clinic performance, clinical practice, and research. They also discussed how they used PROMs within their clinical practice and the benefits of using them with individual patients, for example during the consultation, identifying yellow flags, and tracking patient progress. Chiropractors voiced concerns about patient engagement with PROMs, questioning if patients find them burdensome, and the appropriate PROMs to use with patients with pain. Finally, chiropractors acknowledged the organisational barriers and facilitators to using PROMs within their practice, such as busy practices, electronic systems, and use of reception staff. CONCLUSIONS: Using participating chiropractors’ views of PROMs, the study identified barriers and facilitators to implementing PROMs in chiropractic care, such as clinician knowledge, engagement, and organisational concerns and identified the potential training needs of chiropractors regarding PROMs. The results from the study suggested chiropractors use PROMs with their individual patients, but PROMs should be meaningful to patients and chiropractors to improve engagement. BioMed Central 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6297946/ /pubmed/30568787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0219-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Holmes, Michelle M.
Bishop, Felicity L.
Newell, David
Field, Jonathan
Lewith, George
Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
title Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
title_full Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
title_short Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
title_sort chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0219-6
work_keys_str_mv AT holmesmichellem chiropractorsviewsontheuseofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicalpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT bishopfelicityl chiropractorsviewsontheuseofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicalpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT newelldavid chiropractorsviewsontheuseofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicalpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT fieldjonathan chiropractorsviewsontheuseofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicalpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT lewithgeorge chiropractorsviewsontheuseofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicalpracticeaqualitativestudy