Cargando…

The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing on skin bacterial burden in neonates STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study, arm and groin skin bacterial growth was measured in 40 CHG-exposed and non-exposed neonates admitted to the NICU. Exposed neonates rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Julia, Suwantarat, Nuntra, Colantuoni, Elizabeth, Ross, Tracy L., Aucott, Susan W., Carroll, Karen C., Milstone, Aaron M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0231-7
_version_ 1783381369369395200
author Johnson, Julia
Suwantarat, Nuntra
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Ross, Tracy L.
Aucott, Susan W.
Carroll, Karen C.
Milstone, Aaron M.
author_facet Johnson, Julia
Suwantarat, Nuntra
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Ross, Tracy L.
Aucott, Susan W.
Carroll, Karen C.
Milstone, Aaron M.
author_sort Johnson, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing on skin bacterial burden in neonates STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study, arm and groin skin bacterial growth was measured in 40 CHG-exposed and non-exposed neonates admitted to the NICU. Exposed neonates received 2% CHG baths per protocol for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention or Staphylococcus aureus decolonization. RESULTS: Forty neonates were enrolled, 18 of whom were CHG-exposed. Mean baseline Gram-positive (GP) bacterial burden was 2.19 log CFU/ml on the arm and 1.81 log CFU/ml on the groin. Bacterial burden decreased after the first bath, but returned to baseline by 72 hours. Residual skin CHG concentration declined over time, with a corresponding increase in GP bacterial burden. CONCLUSIONS: CHG bathing reduces skin bacterial burden, but burden returns to baseline after 72 hours. Twice weekly CHG bathing may be inadequate to suppress skin bacterial growth in hospitalized neonates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6298801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62988012019-03-20 The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Johnson, Julia Suwantarat, Nuntra Colantuoni, Elizabeth Ross, Tracy L. Aucott, Susan W. Carroll, Karen C. Milstone, Aaron M. J Perinatol Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing on skin bacterial burden in neonates STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study, arm and groin skin bacterial growth was measured in 40 CHG-exposed and non-exposed neonates admitted to the NICU. Exposed neonates received 2% CHG baths per protocol for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention or Staphylococcus aureus decolonization. RESULTS: Forty neonates were enrolled, 18 of whom were CHG-exposed. Mean baseline Gram-positive (GP) bacterial burden was 2.19 log CFU/ml on the arm and 1.81 log CFU/ml on the groin. Bacterial burden decreased after the first bath, but returned to baseline by 72 hours. Residual skin CHG concentration declined over time, with a corresponding increase in GP bacterial burden. CONCLUSIONS: CHG bathing reduces skin bacterial burden, but burden returns to baseline after 72 hours. Twice weekly CHG bathing may be inadequate to suppress skin bacterial growth in hospitalized neonates. 2018-09-20 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6298801/ /pubmed/30237474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0231-7 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Johnson, Julia
Suwantarat, Nuntra
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Ross, Tracy L.
Aucott, Susan W.
Carroll, Karen C.
Milstone, Aaron M.
The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
title The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
title_full The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
title_short The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
title_sort impact of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on skin bacterial burden of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0231-7
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjulia theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT suwantaratnuntra theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT colantuonielizabeth theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT rosstracyl theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT aucottsusanw theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT carrollkarenc theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT milstoneaaronm theimpactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT johnsonjulia impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT suwantaratnuntra impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT colantuonielizabeth impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT rosstracyl impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT aucottsusanw impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT carrollkarenc impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT milstoneaaronm impactofchlorhexidinegluconatebathingonskinbacterialburdenofneonatesadmittedtotheneonatalintensivecareunit