Cargando…
The number needed to treat and relevant between-trial comparisons of competing interventions
The number needed to treat (NNT) is considered an intuitive as well as popular effect measure. The aims of this review were to 1) explain why we cannot compare trial-specific NNT estimates for the competing treatments evaluated in different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2) outline the prin...
Autores principales: | Jansen, Jeroen P, Khalid, Javaria Mona, Smyth, Michael D, Patel, Haridarshan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30588048 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S180491 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prevalence of anal fistula in the United Kingdom
por: Hokkanen, Suvi RK, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Burden and outcomes for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: Systematic review
por: Panes, Julian, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Global incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
por: Maher, Toby M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Planning clinically relevant biomarker validation studies using the “number needed to treat” concept
por: Day, Roger S.
Publicado: (2016) -
Triptans for Migraine Therapy: A Comparison Based on Number Needed to Treat and Doses Needed to Treat
por: Mullins, C. Daniel
Publicado: (2005)