Cargando…

Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity

The Salience Network (SN) and its interactions are important for cognitive control. We have previously shown that structural damage to the SN is associated with abnormal functional connectivity between the SN and Default Mode Network (DMN), abnormal DMN deactivation, and impaired response inhibition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Lucia M., Violante, Ines R., Leech, Rob, Hampshire, Adam, Opitz, Alexander, McArthur, David, Carmichael, David W., Sharp, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.069
_version_ 1783381443973480448
author Li, Lucia M.
Violante, Ines R.
Leech, Rob
Hampshire, Adam
Opitz, Alexander
McArthur, David
Carmichael, David W.
Sharp, David J.
author_facet Li, Lucia M.
Violante, Ines R.
Leech, Rob
Hampshire, Adam
Opitz, Alexander
McArthur, David
Carmichael, David W.
Sharp, David J.
author_sort Li, Lucia M.
collection PubMed
description The Salience Network (SN) and its interactions are important for cognitive control. We have previously shown that structural damage to the SN is associated with abnormal functional connectivity between the SN and Default Mode Network (DMN), abnormal DMN deactivation, and impaired response inhibition, which is an important aspect of cognitive control. This suggests that stimulating the SN might enhance cognitive control. Here, we tested whether non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) could be used to modulate activity within the SN and enhance cognitive control. TDCS was applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula cortex during performance of the Stop Signal Task (SST) and concurrent functional (f)MRI. Anodal TDCS improved response inhibition. Furthermore, stratification of participants based on SN structural connectivity showed that it was an important influence on both behavioural and physiological responses to anodal TDCS. Participants with high fractional anisotropy within the SN showed improved SST performance and increased activation of the SN with anodal TDCS, whilst those with low fractional anisotropy within the SN did not. Cathodal stimulation of the SN produced activation of the right caudate, an effect which was not modulated by SN structural connectivity. Our results show that stimulation targeted to the SN can improve response inhibition, supporting the causal influence of this network on cognitive control and confirming it as a target to produce cognitive enhancement. Our results also highlight the importance of structural connectivity as a modulator of network to TDCS, which should guide the design and interpretation of future stimulation studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62992572019-01-15 Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity Li, Lucia M. Violante, Ines R. Leech, Rob Hampshire, Adam Opitz, Alexander McArthur, David Carmichael, David W. Sharp, David J. Neuroimage Article The Salience Network (SN) and its interactions are important for cognitive control. We have previously shown that structural damage to the SN is associated with abnormal functional connectivity between the SN and Default Mode Network (DMN), abnormal DMN deactivation, and impaired response inhibition, which is an important aspect of cognitive control. This suggests that stimulating the SN might enhance cognitive control. Here, we tested whether non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) could be used to modulate activity within the SN and enhance cognitive control. TDCS was applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula cortex during performance of the Stop Signal Task (SST) and concurrent functional (f)MRI. Anodal TDCS improved response inhibition. Furthermore, stratification of participants based on SN structural connectivity showed that it was an important influence on both behavioural and physiological responses to anodal TDCS. Participants with high fractional anisotropy within the SN showed improved SST performance and increased activation of the SN with anodal TDCS, whilst those with low fractional anisotropy within the SN did not. Cathodal stimulation of the SN produced activation of the right caudate, an effect which was not modulated by SN structural connectivity. Our results show that stimulation targeted to the SN can improve response inhibition, supporting the causal influence of this network on cognitive control and confirming it as a target to produce cognitive enhancement. Our results also highlight the importance of structural connectivity as a modulator of network to TDCS, which should guide the design and interpretation of future stimulation studies. Academic Press 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6299257/ /pubmed/30385222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.069 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Lucia M.
Violante, Ines R.
Leech, Rob
Hampshire, Adam
Opitz, Alexander
McArthur, David
Carmichael, David W.
Sharp, David J.
Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
title Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
title_full Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
title_fullStr Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
title_short Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
title_sort cognitive enhancement with salience network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.069
work_keys_str_mv AT liluciam cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT violanteinesr cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT leechrob cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT hampshireadam cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT opitzalexander cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT mcarthurdavid cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT carmichaeldavidw cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity
AT sharpdavidj cognitiveenhancementwithsaliencenetworkelectricalstimulationisinfluencedbynetworkstructuralconnectivity