Cargando…

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Women Toward Prenatal Genetic Testing

OBJECTIVES: We aim to address public knowledge, attitudes, and practices relative to prenatal genetic testing as a starting point for policy development in Jordan. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional prenatal genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey with 1111 women recruit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdo, Nour, Ibraheem, Nadia, Obeidat, Nail, Graboski-Bauer, Ashley, Batieha, Anwar, Altamimi, Nada, Khatatbih, Moawia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30620008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2516865718813122
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: We aim to address public knowledge, attitudes, and practices relative to prenatal genetic testing as a starting point for policy development in Jordan. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional prenatal genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey with 1111 women recruited at obstetrics and gynecology clinics nationwide. Data were analyzed using a variety of descriptive and inferential statistical tests. RESULTS: The overwhelming majority (>94%) of participants considered prenatal genetic testing, particularly non-invasive prenatal genetic screening, procedures to be good, comfortable, and reasonable, even when the non-diagnostic nature of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening was explained. Likewise, 95% encouraged the implementation of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening within the Jordanian health system, but most preferred it to remain optional. However, women in higher-risk age brackets, in consanguineous marriages, and with less education were significantly less interested in learning about non-invasive prenatal genetic screening. Only 60% of women interviewed were satisfied with the services provided by their obstetric/gynecologist. The more satisfied the women were, the more they are likely to adapt non-invasive prenatal genetic screening. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, although the data support the receptivity of Jordanian women to national implementation of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening, such policies should be accompanied by health education to increase the genetic literacy of the population and to engage high-risk populations. Thus, this offers rare insight into the readiness of 1 particular Arab population to adapt non-invasive prenatal genetic screening technologies.