Cargando…

The health of workers in the global gig economy

BACKGROUND: The “gig” economy connects consumers with contractors (or workers) through online platform businesses to perform tasks (or “gigs”). This innovation in technology provides businesses and consumers access to low-cost, on-demand labour, but gig workers’ experiences are more complex. They ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajwa, Uttam, Gastaldo, Denise, Di Ruggiero, Erica, Knorr, Lilian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8
_version_ 1783381495523573760
author Bajwa, Uttam
Gastaldo, Denise
Di Ruggiero, Erica
Knorr, Lilian
author_facet Bajwa, Uttam
Gastaldo, Denise
Di Ruggiero, Erica
Knorr, Lilian
author_sort Bajwa, Uttam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The “gig” economy connects consumers with contractors (or workers) through online platform businesses to perform tasks (or “gigs”). This innovation in technology provides businesses and consumers access to low-cost, on-demand labour, but gig workers’ experiences are more complex. They have access to very flexible, potentially autonomous work, but also deal with challenges caused by the nature of the work, its precariousness, and their relationships with the platform businesses. Workers in the Global North and South may also experience these challenges very differently. Based on our report “Towards an Understanding of Canadian Workers in the Global Gig Economy”, we present a commentary on the implications of a globalized online platform labour market on the health of gig workers in Canada and globally. MAIN BODY: Based on our scoping review of peer and grey literature, we categorized gig worker vulnerabilities in three ways: 1) occupational vulnerabilities, 2) precarity, and 3) platform-based vulnerabilities. Occupational vulnerabilities are connected to the work being performed (e.g. driving a car or computer work) and are not specific to platform labour. Precarity refers to the short-term, contingent nature of the work, characteristics that may be shared with other forms of work. Some examples of precariousness are lack of health insurance, collective bargaining, or career training and promotion. Finally, platform-based vulnerabilities are particular to the way platform labour is structured. These vulnerabilities include worker misclassification, information asymmetries, and the culture of surveillance. We suggest that, together, these vulnerabilities challenge gig workers’ right to health. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the experience of gig workers around the world must be understood in the context of neoliberalism, which has increased both the globalization and precaritization of work. While gig workers share some vulnerabilities, which have important negative consequences on their health, with other workers, the platform-specific vulnerabilities of workers require further inquiry. In particular, the specific health and overall experience of gig workers in different regions of the world – with different labour policies and sociopolitical contexts for work – must be disentangled as workers in the Global North and South experience this work very differently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62995012018-12-20 The health of workers in the global gig economy Bajwa, Uttam Gastaldo, Denise Di Ruggiero, Erica Knorr, Lilian Global Health Commentary BACKGROUND: The “gig” economy connects consumers with contractors (or workers) through online platform businesses to perform tasks (or “gigs”). This innovation in technology provides businesses and consumers access to low-cost, on-demand labour, but gig workers’ experiences are more complex. They have access to very flexible, potentially autonomous work, but also deal with challenges caused by the nature of the work, its precariousness, and their relationships with the platform businesses. Workers in the Global North and South may also experience these challenges very differently. Based on our report “Towards an Understanding of Canadian Workers in the Global Gig Economy”, we present a commentary on the implications of a globalized online platform labour market on the health of gig workers in Canada and globally. MAIN BODY: Based on our scoping review of peer and grey literature, we categorized gig worker vulnerabilities in three ways: 1) occupational vulnerabilities, 2) precarity, and 3) platform-based vulnerabilities. Occupational vulnerabilities are connected to the work being performed (e.g. driving a car or computer work) and are not specific to platform labour. Precarity refers to the short-term, contingent nature of the work, characteristics that may be shared with other forms of work. Some examples of precariousness are lack of health insurance, collective bargaining, or career training and promotion. Finally, platform-based vulnerabilities are particular to the way platform labour is structured. These vulnerabilities include worker misclassification, information asymmetries, and the culture of surveillance. We suggest that, together, these vulnerabilities challenge gig workers’ right to health. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the experience of gig workers around the world must be understood in the context of neoliberalism, which has increased both the globalization and precaritization of work. While gig workers share some vulnerabilities, which have important negative consequences on their health, with other workers, the platform-specific vulnerabilities of workers require further inquiry. In particular, the specific health and overall experience of gig workers in different regions of the world – with different labour policies and sociopolitical contexts for work – must be disentangled as workers in the Global North and South experience this work very differently. BioMed Central 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6299501/ /pubmed/30563539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Bajwa, Uttam
Gastaldo, Denise
Di Ruggiero, Erica
Knorr, Lilian
The health of workers in the global gig economy
title The health of workers in the global gig economy
title_full The health of workers in the global gig economy
title_fullStr The health of workers in the global gig economy
title_full_unstemmed The health of workers in the global gig economy
title_short The health of workers in the global gig economy
title_sort health of workers in the global gig economy
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bajwauttam thehealthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT gastaldodenise thehealthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT diruggieroerica thehealthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT knorrlilian thehealthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT bajwauttam healthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT gastaldodenise healthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT diruggieroerica healthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy
AT knorrlilian healthofworkersintheglobalgigeconomy