Cargando…

Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government

BACKGROUND: Public health in England has opportunities to reduce alcohol-related harms via shaping the availability and accessibility of alcohol through the licensing function in local government. While the constraints of licensing legislation have been recognised, what is currently little understoo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Joanna, McGrath, Michael, Engen, Jessica, Pashmi, Ghazaleh, Andrews, Matthew, Lim, Jin, Lock, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8
_version_ 1783381501887381504
author Reynolds, Joanna
McGrath, Michael
Engen, Jessica
Pashmi, Ghazaleh
Andrews, Matthew
Lim, Jin
Lock, Karen
author_facet Reynolds, Joanna
McGrath, Michael
Engen, Jessica
Pashmi, Ghazaleh
Andrews, Matthew
Lim, Jin
Lock, Karen
author_sort Reynolds, Joanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public health in England has opportunities to reduce alcohol-related harms via shaping the availability and accessibility of alcohol through the licensing function in local government. While the constraints of licensing legislation have been recognised, what is currently little understood are the day-to-day realities of how public health practitioners enact the licensing role, and how they can influence the local alcohol environment. METHODS: To address this, a mixed-methods study was conducted across 24 local authorities in Greater London between 2016 and 17. Data collection involved ethnographic observation of public health practitioners’ alcohol licensing work (in eight local authorities); a survey of public health practitioners (n = 18); interviews with licensing stakeholders (n = 10); and analysis of public health licensing data from five local authorities. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were analysed thematically, and quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Results indicated that some public health teams struggle to justify the resources required to engage with licensing processes when they perceive little capacity to influence licensing decisions. Other public health teams consider the licensing role as important for shaping the local alcohol environment, and also as a strategic approach for positioning public health within the council. Practitioners use different processes to assess the potential risks of licence applications but also the potential strengths of their objections, to determine when and how actions should be taken. Identifying the direct influence of public health on individual licences is challenging, but the study revealed how practitioners did achieve some level of impact, for example through negotiation with applicants. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows public health impact following alcohol licensing work is difficult to measure in terms of reducing alcohol-related harms, which poses challenges for justifying this work amid resource constraints. However, there is potential added value of the licensing role in strategic positioning of public health in local government to influence broader determinants of health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62995252018-12-20 Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government Reynolds, Joanna McGrath, Michael Engen, Jessica Pashmi, Ghazaleh Andrews, Matthew Lim, Jin Lock, Karen BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Public health in England has opportunities to reduce alcohol-related harms via shaping the availability and accessibility of alcohol through the licensing function in local government. While the constraints of licensing legislation have been recognised, what is currently little understood are the day-to-day realities of how public health practitioners enact the licensing role, and how they can influence the local alcohol environment. METHODS: To address this, a mixed-methods study was conducted across 24 local authorities in Greater London between 2016 and 17. Data collection involved ethnographic observation of public health practitioners’ alcohol licensing work (in eight local authorities); a survey of public health practitioners (n = 18); interviews with licensing stakeholders (n = 10); and analysis of public health licensing data from five local authorities. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were analysed thematically, and quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Results indicated that some public health teams struggle to justify the resources required to engage with licensing processes when they perceive little capacity to influence licensing decisions. Other public health teams consider the licensing role as important for shaping the local alcohol environment, and also as a strategic approach for positioning public health within the council. Practitioners use different processes to assess the potential risks of licence applications but also the potential strengths of their objections, to determine when and how actions should be taken. Identifying the direct influence of public health on individual licences is challenging, but the study revealed how practitioners did achieve some level of impact, for example through negotiation with applicants. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows public health impact following alcohol licensing work is difficult to measure in terms of reducing alcohol-related harms, which poses challenges for justifying this work amid resource constraints. However, there is potential added value of the licensing role in strategic positioning of public health in local government to influence broader determinants of health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6299525/ /pubmed/30563484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reynolds, Joanna
McGrath, Michael
Engen, Jessica
Pashmi, Ghazaleh
Andrews, Matthew
Lim, Jin
Lock, Karen
Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
title Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
title_full Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
title_fullStr Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
title_full_unstemmed Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
title_short Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
title_sort processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsjoanna processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment
AT mcgrathmichael processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment
AT engenjessica processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment
AT pashmighazaleh processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment
AT andrewsmatthew processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment
AT limjin processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment
AT lockkaren processespracticesandinfluenceamixedmethodsstudyofpublichealthcontributionstoalcohollicensinginlocalgovernment