Cargando…

Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent pear fruit ripening resulting from variable harvest maturity within tree canopies can contribute to postharvest losses through senescence and spoilage that would otherwise be effectively managed using crop protectant and storage regimes. Because those inconsistencies are lik...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serra, Sara, Sullivan, Nathanael, Mattheis, James P., Musacchi, Stefano, Rudell, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1544-6
_version_ 1783381520316104704
author Serra, Sara
Sullivan, Nathanael
Mattheis, James P.
Musacchi, Stefano
Rudell, David R.
author_facet Serra, Sara
Sullivan, Nathanael
Mattheis, James P.
Musacchi, Stefano
Rudell, David R.
author_sort Serra, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inconsistent pear fruit ripening resulting from variable harvest maturity within tree canopies can contribute to postharvest losses through senescence and spoilage that would otherwise be effectively managed using crop protectant and storage regimes. Because those inconsistencies are likely based on metabolic differences, non-targeted metabolic profiling peel of ‘d’Anjou’ pears harvested from the external or internal canopy was used to determine the breadth of difference and link metabolites with canopy position during long-term controlled atmosphere storage. RESULTS: Differences were widespread, encompassing everything from expected distinctions in flavonol glycoside levels between peel of fruit from external and internal canopy positions to increased aroma volatile production and sucrose hydrolysis with ripening. Some of the most substantial differences were in levels of triterpene and phenolic peel cuticle components among which acyl esters of ursolic acid and fatty acyl esters of p-coumaryl alcohol were higher in the cuticle of fruit from external tree positions, and acyl esters of α-amyrin were elevated in peel of fruit from internal positions. Possibly the most substantial dissimilarities were those that were directly related to fruit quality. Phytosterol conjugates and sesquiterpenes related to elevated superficial scald risk were higher in pears from external positions which were to be potentially rendered unmarketable by superficial scald. Other metabolites associated with fruit aroma and flavor became more prevalent in external fruit peel as ripening progressed and, likewise, with differential soluble solids and ethylene levels, suggesting the final product not only ripens differentially but the final fruit quality following ripening is actually different based on the tree position. CONCLUSIONS: Given the impact tree position appears to have on the most intrinsic aspects of ripening and quality, every supply chain management strategy would likely lead to diverse storage outcomes among fruit from most orchards, especially those with large canopies. Metabolites consistently associated with peel of fruit from a particular canopy position may provide targets for non-destructive pre-storage sorting used to reduce losses contributed by this inconsistency. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-018-1544-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62996022018-12-20 Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit Serra, Sara Sullivan, Nathanael Mattheis, James P. Musacchi, Stefano Rudell, David R. BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Inconsistent pear fruit ripening resulting from variable harvest maturity within tree canopies can contribute to postharvest losses through senescence and spoilage that would otherwise be effectively managed using crop protectant and storage regimes. Because those inconsistencies are likely based on metabolic differences, non-targeted metabolic profiling peel of ‘d’Anjou’ pears harvested from the external or internal canopy was used to determine the breadth of difference and link metabolites with canopy position during long-term controlled atmosphere storage. RESULTS: Differences were widespread, encompassing everything from expected distinctions in flavonol glycoside levels between peel of fruit from external and internal canopy positions to increased aroma volatile production and sucrose hydrolysis with ripening. Some of the most substantial differences were in levels of triterpene and phenolic peel cuticle components among which acyl esters of ursolic acid and fatty acyl esters of p-coumaryl alcohol were higher in the cuticle of fruit from external tree positions, and acyl esters of α-amyrin were elevated in peel of fruit from internal positions. Possibly the most substantial dissimilarities were those that were directly related to fruit quality. Phytosterol conjugates and sesquiterpenes related to elevated superficial scald risk were higher in pears from external positions which were to be potentially rendered unmarketable by superficial scald. Other metabolites associated with fruit aroma and flavor became more prevalent in external fruit peel as ripening progressed and, likewise, with differential soluble solids and ethylene levels, suggesting the final product not only ripens differentially but the final fruit quality following ripening is actually different based on the tree position. CONCLUSIONS: Given the impact tree position appears to have on the most intrinsic aspects of ripening and quality, every supply chain management strategy would likely lead to diverse storage outcomes among fruit from most orchards, especially those with large canopies. Metabolites consistently associated with peel of fruit from a particular canopy position may provide targets for non-destructive pre-storage sorting used to reduce losses contributed by this inconsistency. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-018-1544-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6299602/ /pubmed/30563450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1544-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Serra, Sara
Sullivan, Nathanael
Mattheis, James P.
Musacchi, Stefano
Rudell, David R.
Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit
title Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit
title_full Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit
title_fullStr Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit
title_full_unstemmed Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit
title_short Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit
title_sort canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of european pear fruit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1544-6
work_keys_str_mv AT serrasara canopyattachmentpositioninfluencesmetabolismandpeelconstituencyofeuropeanpearfruit
AT sullivannathanael canopyattachmentpositioninfluencesmetabolismandpeelconstituencyofeuropeanpearfruit
AT mattheisjamesp canopyattachmentpositioninfluencesmetabolismandpeelconstituencyofeuropeanpearfruit
AT musacchistefano canopyattachmentpositioninfluencesmetabolismandpeelconstituencyofeuropeanpearfruit
AT rudelldavidr canopyattachmentpositioninfluencesmetabolismandpeelconstituencyofeuropeanpearfruit