Cargando…

Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients

BACKGROUND: In recent years, surgical outcomes have improved, and positive reports on surgery for type A aortic dissection (AAD) in the elderly are increasing. However, the difference between surgical and conservative treatments in the elderly remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoyama, Takeshi, Kunisawa, Susumu, Fushimi, Kiyohide, Sawa, Teiji, Imanaka, Yuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6
_version_ 1783381525233926144
author Aoyama, Takeshi
Kunisawa, Susumu
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Sawa, Teiji
Imanaka, Yuichi
author_facet Aoyama, Takeshi
Kunisawa, Susumu
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Sawa, Teiji
Imanaka, Yuichi
author_sort Aoyama, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, surgical outcomes have improved, and positive reports on surgery for type A aortic dissection (AAD) in the elderly are increasing. However, the difference between surgical and conservative treatments in the elderly remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine whether surgery should be performed for Stanford (AAD) in elderly patients. METHODS: Data of patients aged 80 years or older who were hospitalized for AAD from April 2014 to March 2016 were extracted from the Japanese national inpatient database. Outcome measures were all-cause in-hospital death, stroke, acute kidney injury and tracheotomy, and composite adverse events (consisting of all-cause in-hospital death, stroke, acute kidney injury, and tracheotomy), and we compared them between surgical and conservative treatments using propensity score matching. RESULTS: The study cohort included 3258 patients, with 845 matched pairs (1690 patients) in the propensity score matching. All-cause in-hospital death was significantly lower in the surgical treatment group than in the conservative treatment group before and after matching (15.6% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001; 16.7% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001, respectively); however, there was no significant difference in composite adverse events after matching (36.0%, conservative vs. 37.2%, surgical; p = 0.65), and adjusted odds ratio was 1.06 and 95% confidence interval was 0.86–1.29 (p = 0.61) with reference to conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause in-hospital death among elderly patients with AAD was significantly lower in patients treated surgically than in those undergoing conservative treatment. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the event-free survival, which is important for the elderly. These findings may be used in the consideration of treatment course for elderly patients with AAD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62996242018-12-20 Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients Aoyama, Takeshi Kunisawa, Susumu Fushimi, Kiyohide Sawa, Teiji Imanaka, Yuichi J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, surgical outcomes have improved, and positive reports on surgery for type A aortic dissection (AAD) in the elderly are increasing. However, the difference between surgical and conservative treatments in the elderly remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine whether surgery should be performed for Stanford (AAD) in elderly patients. METHODS: Data of patients aged 80 years or older who were hospitalized for AAD from April 2014 to March 2016 were extracted from the Japanese national inpatient database. Outcome measures were all-cause in-hospital death, stroke, acute kidney injury and tracheotomy, and composite adverse events (consisting of all-cause in-hospital death, stroke, acute kidney injury, and tracheotomy), and we compared them between surgical and conservative treatments using propensity score matching. RESULTS: The study cohort included 3258 patients, with 845 matched pairs (1690 patients) in the propensity score matching. All-cause in-hospital death was significantly lower in the surgical treatment group than in the conservative treatment group before and after matching (15.6% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001; 16.7% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001, respectively); however, there was no significant difference in composite adverse events after matching (36.0%, conservative vs. 37.2%, surgical; p = 0.65), and adjusted odds ratio was 1.06 and 95% confidence interval was 0.86–1.29 (p = 0.61) with reference to conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause in-hospital death among elderly patients with AAD was significantly lower in patients treated surgically than in those undergoing conservative treatment. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the event-free survival, which is important for the elderly. These findings may be used in the consideration of treatment course for elderly patients with AAD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6299624/ /pubmed/30563552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aoyama, Takeshi
Kunisawa, Susumu
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Sawa, Teiji
Imanaka, Yuichi
Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
title Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
title_full Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
title_fullStr Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
title_short Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
title_sort comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6
work_keys_str_mv AT aoyamatakeshi comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentoutcomesfortypeaaorticdissectioninelderlypatients
AT kunisawasusumu comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentoutcomesfortypeaaorticdissectioninelderlypatients
AT fushimikiyohide comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentoutcomesfortypeaaorticdissectioninelderlypatients
AT sawateiji comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentoutcomesfortypeaaorticdissectioninelderlypatients
AT imanakayuichi comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentoutcomesfortypeaaorticdissectioninelderlypatients