Cargando…

Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans

Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) imaging uses chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging to retrieve information about the microcirculation using infusion of a natural sugar (D-glucose). However, this new approach is not yet well understood with respect to the dynamic tissue resp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knutsson, Linda, Seidemo, Anina, Rydhög Scherman, Anna, Markenroth Bloch, Karin, Kalyani, Rita R., Andersen, Mads, Sundgren, Pia C., Wirestam, Ronnie, Helms, Gunther, van Zijl, Peter C.M., Xu, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30588502
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00025
_version_ 1783381552537796608
author Knutsson, Linda
Seidemo, Anina
Rydhög Scherman, Anna
Markenroth Bloch, Karin
Kalyani, Rita R.
Andersen, Mads
Sundgren, Pia C.
Wirestam, Ronnie
Helms, Gunther
van Zijl, Peter C.M.
Xu, Xiang
author_facet Knutsson, Linda
Seidemo, Anina
Rydhög Scherman, Anna
Markenroth Bloch, Karin
Kalyani, Rita R.
Andersen, Mads
Sundgren, Pia C.
Wirestam, Ronnie
Helms, Gunther
van Zijl, Peter C.M.
Xu, Xiang
author_sort Knutsson, Linda
collection PubMed
description Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) imaging uses chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging to retrieve information about the microcirculation using infusion of a natural sugar (D-glucose). However, this new approach is not yet well understood with respect to the dynamic tissue response. DGE time curves for arteries, normal brain tissue, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were analyzed in healthy volunteers and compared with the time dependence of sampled venous plasma blood glucose levels. The arterial response curves (arterial input function [AIF]) compared reasonably well in shape with the time curves of the sampled glucose levels but could also differ substantially. The brain tissue response curves showed mainly negative responses with a peak intensity that was of the order of 10 times smaller than the AIF peak and a shape that was susceptible to both noise and partial volume effects with CSF, attributed to the low contrast-to-noise ratio. The CSF response curves showed a rather large and steady increase of the glucose uptake during the scan, due to the rapid uptake of D-glucose in CSF. Importantly, and contrary to gadolinium studies, the curves differed substantially among volunteers, which was interpreted to be caused by variations in insulin response. In conclusion, while AIFs and tissue response curves can be measured in DGE experiments, partial volume effects, low concentration of D-glucose in tissue, and osmolality effects between tissue and blood may prohibit quantification of normal tissue perfusion parameters. However, separation of tumor responses from normal tissue responses would most likely be feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Grapho Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62997432018-12-26 Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans Knutsson, Linda Seidemo, Anina Rydhög Scherman, Anna Markenroth Bloch, Karin Kalyani, Rita R. Andersen, Mads Sundgren, Pia C. Wirestam, Ronnie Helms, Gunther van Zijl, Peter C.M. Xu, Xiang Tomography Research Articles Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) imaging uses chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging to retrieve information about the microcirculation using infusion of a natural sugar (D-glucose). However, this new approach is not yet well understood with respect to the dynamic tissue response. DGE time curves for arteries, normal brain tissue, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were analyzed in healthy volunteers and compared with the time dependence of sampled venous plasma blood glucose levels. The arterial response curves (arterial input function [AIF]) compared reasonably well in shape with the time curves of the sampled glucose levels but could also differ substantially. The brain tissue response curves showed mainly negative responses with a peak intensity that was of the order of 10 times smaller than the AIF peak and a shape that was susceptible to both noise and partial volume effects with CSF, attributed to the low contrast-to-noise ratio. The CSF response curves showed a rather large and steady increase of the glucose uptake during the scan, due to the rapid uptake of D-glucose in CSF. Importantly, and contrary to gadolinium studies, the curves differed substantially among volunteers, which was interpreted to be caused by variations in insulin response. In conclusion, while AIFs and tissue response curves can be measured in DGE experiments, partial volume effects, low concentration of D-glucose in tissue, and osmolality effects between tissue and blood may prohibit quantification of normal tissue perfusion parameters. However, separation of tumor responses from normal tissue responses would most likely be feasible. Grapho Publications, LLC 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6299743/ /pubmed/30588502 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00025 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Knutsson, Linda
Seidemo, Anina
Rydhög Scherman, Anna
Markenroth Bloch, Karin
Kalyani, Rita R.
Andersen, Mads
Sundgren, Pia C.
Wirestam, Ronnie
Helms, Gunther
van Zijl, Peter C.M.
Xu, Xiang
Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans
title Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans
title_full Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans
title_fullStr Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans
title_full_unstemmed Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans
title_short Arterial Input Functions and Tissue Response Curves in Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) Imaging: Comparison Between glucoCEST and Blood Glucose Sampling in Humans
title_sort arterial input functions and tissue response curves in dynamic glucose-enhanced (dge) imaging: comparison between glucocest and blood glucose sampling in humans
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30588502
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00025
work_keys_str_mv AT knutssonlinda arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT seidemoanina arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT rydhogschermananna arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT markenrothblochkarin arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT kalyaniritar arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT andersenmads arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT sundgrenpiac arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT wirestamronnie arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT helmsgunther arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT vanzijlpetercm arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans
AT xuxiang arterialinputfunctionsandtissueresponsecurvesindynamicglucoseenhanceddgeimagingcomparisonbetweenglucocestandbloodglucosesamplinginhumans