Cargando…

Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom

AIM: The aim of this study is to measure and compare the surface dose of treated breast and contralateral breast with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose using calibrated optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) in an indigenous wax breast phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gopalakrishnan, Zhenia, Nair, Raghuram K., Raghukumar, P., Menon, Sharika V., Bhasi, Saju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30636852
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_112_18
_version_ 1783381554195595264
author Gopalakrishnan, Zhenia
Nair, Raghuram K.
Raghukumar, P.
Menon, Sharika V.
Bhasi, Saju
author_facet Gopalakrishnan, Zhenia
Nair, Raghuram K.
Raghukumar, P.
Menon, Sharika V.
Bhasi, Saju
author_sort Gopalakrishnan, Zhenia
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to measure and compare the surface dose of treated breast and contralateral breast with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose using calibrated optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) in an indigenous wax breast phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional conformal plans were generated in eclipse TPS v. 13 to treat the left breast of a wax phantom for a prescribed dose of 200 cGy. The plans were calculated using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros algorithm with 1-mm grid size. Calibrated OSLDs were used to measure the surface dose of treated and contralateral breasts. RESULTS: Large differences were observed between measured and expected doses when OSLDs were read in “reading mode” compared to the “hardware mode.” The consistency in the responses of OSLDs was better (deviation <±5%) in the “hardware mode.” Reasonable agreement between TPS dose and measured dose was found in regions inside the treatment field of treated breast using OSLDs for both algorithms. OSLD measured doses and TPS doses, for the points where the angle of incidence was almost normal, were in good agreement compared to all other locations where the angle of incidence varied from 45° to 70°. The maximum deviation between measured doses and calculated doses with AAA and with Acuros were 2.2% and-12.38%, respectively, for planning target volume breast, and 76% and 77.51%, respectively, for the opposite breast. CONCLUSION: An independent calibration factor is required before using the OSLDs for in vivo dose measurements. With reference to measured doses using OSLD, the accuracy of skin dose estimation of TPS with AAA was better than with Acuros for both the breasts. In general, a reasonable agreement between TPS doses calculated using AAA and measured doses exists in regions inside treatment field, but unacceptable differences were observed for the points lateral to the opposite breast for both AAA and Acuros.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62997502019-01-11 Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom Gopalakrishnan, Zhenia Nair, Raghuram K. Raghukumar, P. Menon, Sharika V. Bhasi, Saju J Med Phys Technical Note AIM: The aim of this study is to measure and compare the surface dose of treated breast and contralateral breast with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose using calibrated optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) in an indigenous wax breast phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional conformal plans were generated in eclipse TPS v. 13 to treat the left breast of a wax phantom for a prescribed dose of 200 cGy. The plans were calculated using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros algorithm with 1-mm grid size. Calibrated OSLDs were used to measure the surface dose of treated and contralateral breasts. RESULTS: Large differences were observed between measured and expected doses when OSLDs were read in “reading mode” compared to the “hardware mode.” The consistency in the responses of OSLDs was better (deviation <±5%) in the “hardware mode.” Reasonable agreement between TPS dose and measured dose was found in regions inside the treatment field of treated breast using OSLDs for both algorithms. OSLD measured doses and TPS doses, for the points where the angle of incidence was almost normal, were in good agreement compared to all other locations where the angle of incidence varied from 45° to 70°. The maximum deviation between measured doses and calculated doses with AAA and with Acuros were 2.2% and-12.38%, respectively, for planning target volume breast, and 76% and 77.51%, respectively, for the opposite breast. CONCLUSION: An independent calibration factor is required before using the OSLDs for in vivo dose measurements. With reference to measured doses using OSLD, the accuracy of skin dose estimation of TPS with AAA was better than with Acuros for both the breasts. In general, a reasonable agreement between TPS doses calculated using AAA and measured doses exists in regions inside treatment field, but unacceptable differences were observed for the points lateral to the opposite breast for both AAA and Acuros. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6299750/ /pubmed/30636852 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_112_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Gopalakrishnan, Zhenia
Nair, Raghuram K.
Raghukumar, P.
Menon, Sharika V.
Bhasi, Saju
Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom
title Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom
title_full Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom
title_fullStr Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom
title_full_unstemmed Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom
title_short Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom
title_sort verification of treatment planning algorithms using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters in a breast phantom
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30636852
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_112_18
work_keys_str_mv AT gopalakrishnanzhenia verificationoftreatmentplanningalgorithmsusingopticallystimulatedluminescentdosimetersinabreastphantom
AT nairraghuramk verificationoftreatmentplanningalgorithmsusingopticallystimulatedluminescentdosimetersinabreastphantom
AT raghukumarp verificationoftreatmentplanningalgorithmsusingopticallystimulatedluminescentdosimetersinabreastphantom
AT menonsharikav verificationoftreatmentplanningalgorithmsusingopticallystimulatedluminescentdosimetersinabreastphantom
AT bhasisaju verificationoftreatmentplanningalgorithmsusingopticallystimulatedluminescentdosimetersinabreastphantom