Cargando…

The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures

BACKGROUND: Grazed grassland management regimes can have various effects on soil fauna. For example, effects on earthworms can be negative through compaction induced by grazing animals, or positive mediated by increases in sward productivity and cattle dung pats providing a food source. Knowledge ga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bacher, M. G., Fenton, O., Bondi, G., Creamer, R. E., Karmarkar, M., Schmidt, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6
_version_ 1783381603359129600
author Bacher, M. G.
Fenton, O.
Bondi, G.
Creamer, R. E.
Karmarkar, M.
Schmidt, O.
author_facet Bacher, M. G.
Fenton, O.
Bondi, G.
Creamer, R. E.
Karmarkar, M.
Schmidt, O.
author_sort Bacher, M. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Grazed grassland management regimes can have various effects on soil fauna. For example, effects on earthworms can be negative through compaction induced by grazing animals, or positive mediated by increases in sward productivity and cattle dung pats providing a food source. Knowledge gaps exist in relation to the behaviour of different earthworm species i.e. their movement towards and aggregation under dung pats, the legacy effects of pats and the spatial area of recruitment. The present study addressed these knowledge gaps in field experiments, over 2 years, using natural and simulated dung pats on two permanent, intensively grazed pastures in Ireland. RESULTS: Dung pats strongly affected spatial earthworm distribution, with up to four times more earthworms aggregating beneath pats, than in the control locations away from pats. In these earthworm communities comprising 11 species, temporally different aggregation and dispersal patterns were observed, including absence of individual species from control locations, but no clear successional responses. Epigeic species in general, but also certain species of the anecic and endogeic groups were aggregating under dung. Sampling after complete dung pat disappearance (27 weeks after application) suggested an absence of a dung pat legacy effect on earthworm communities. Based on species distributions, the maximum size of the recruitment area from which earthworms moved to pats was estimated to be 3.8 m(2) per dung pat. Since actual grazing over 6 weeks would result in the deposition of about 300 dung pats per ha, it is estimated that a surface area of 1140 m(2) or about 11% of the total grazing area can be influenced by dung pats in a given grazing period. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the presence of dung pats in pastures creates temporary hot spots in spatial earthworm species distribution, which changes over time. The findings highlight the importance of considering dung pats, temporally and spatially, when sampling earthworms in grazed pastures. Published comparisons of grazed and cut grasslands probably reached incorrect conclusions by ignoring or deliberately avoiding dung pats. Furthermore, the observed intense aggregation of earthworms beneath dung pats suggests that earthworm functions need to be assessed separately at these hot spots. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6299995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62999952018-12-20 The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures Bacher, M. G. Fenton, O. Bondi, G. Creamer, R. E. Karmarkar, M. Schmidt, O. BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: Grazed grassland management regimes can have various effects on soil fauna. For example, effects on earthworms can be negative through compaction induced by grazing animals, or positive mediated by increases in sward productivity and cattle dung pats providing a food source. Knowledge gaps exist in relation to the behaviour of different earthworm species i.e. their movement towards and aggregation under dung pats, the legacy effects of pats and the spatial area of recruitment. The present study addressed these knowledge gaps in field experiments, over 2 years, using natural and simulated dung pats on two permanent, intensively grazed pastures in Ireland. RESULTS: Dung pats strongly affected spatial earthworm distribution, with up to four times more earthworms aggregating beneath pats, than in the control locations away from pats. In these earthworm communities comprising 11 species, temporally different aggregation and dispersal patterns were observed, including absence of individual species from control locations, but no clear successional responses. Epigeic species in general, but also certain species of the anecic and endogeic groups were aggregating under dung. Sampling after complete dung pat disappearance (27 weeks after application) suggested an absence of a dung pat legacy effect on earthworm communities. Based on species distributions, the maximum size of the recruitment area from which earthworms moved to pats was estimated to be 3.8 m(2) per dung pat. Since actual grazing over 6 weeks would result in the deposition of about 300 dung pats per ha, it is estimated that a surface area of 1140 m(2) or about 11% of the total grazing area can be influenced by dung pats in a given grazing period. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the presence of dung pats in pastures creates temporary hot spots in spatial earthworm species distribution, which changes over time. The findings highlight the importance of considering dung pats, temporally and spatially, when sampling earthworms in grazed pastures. Published comparisons of grazed and cut grasslands probably reached incorrect conclusions by ignoring or deliberately avoiding dung pats. Furthermore, the observed intense aggregation of earthworms beneath dung pats suggests that earthworm functions need to be assessed separately at these hot spots. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6299995/ /pubmed/30567522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bacher, M. G.
Fenton, O.
Bondi, G.
Creamer, R. E.
Karmarkar, M.
Schmidt, O.
The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
title The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
title_full The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
title_fullStr The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
title_full_unstemmed The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
title_short The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
title_sort impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bachermg theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT fentono theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT bondig theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT creamerre theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT karmarkarm theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT schmidto theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT bachermg impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT fentono impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT bondig impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT creamerre impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT karmarkarm impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures
AT schmidto impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures