Cargando…
The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures
BACKGROUND: Grazed grassland management regimes can have various effects on soil fauna. For example, effects on earthworms can be negative through compaction induced by grazing animals, or positive mediated by increases in sward productivity and cattle dung pats providing a food source. Knowledge ga...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6 |
_version_ | 1783381603359129600 |
---|---|
author | Bacher, M. G. Fenton, O. Bondi, G. Creamer, R. E. Karmarkar, M. Schmidt, O. |
author_facet | Bacher, M. G. Fenton, O. Bondi, G. Creamer, R. E. Karmarkar, M. Schmidt, O. |
author_sort | Bacher, M. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Grazed grassland management regimes can have various effects on soil fauna. For example, effects on earthworms can be negative through compaction induced by grazing animals, or positive mediated by increases in sward productivity and cattle dung pats providing a food source. Knowledge gaps exist in relation to the behaviour of different earthworm species i.e. their movement towards and aggregation under dung pats, the legacy effects of pats and the spatial area of recruitment. The present study addressed these knowledge gaps in field experiments, over 2 years, using natural and simulated dung pats on two permanent, intensively grazed pastures in Ireland. RESULTS: Dung pats strongly affected spatial earthworm distribution, with up to four times more earthworms aggregating beneath pats, than in the control locations away from pats. In these earthworm communities comprising 11 species, temporally different aggregation and dispersal patterns were observed, including absence of individual species from control locations, but no clear successional responses. Epigeic species in general, but also certain species of the anecic and endogeic groups were aggregating under dung. Sampling after complete dung pat disappearance (27 weeks after application) suggested an absence of a dung pat legacy effect on earthworm communities. Based on species distributions, the maximum size of the recruitment area from which earthworms moved to pats was estimated to be 3.8 m(2) per dung pat. Since actual grazing over 6 weeks would result in the deposition of about 300 dung pats per ha, it is estimated that a surface area of 1140 m(2) or about 11% of the total grazing area can be influenced by dung pats in a given grazing period. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the presence of dung pats in pastures creates temporary hot spots in spatial earthworm species distribution, which changes over time. The findings highlight the importance of considering dung pats, temporally and spatially, when sampling earthworms in grazed pastures. Published comparisons of grazed and cut grasslands probably reached incorrect conclusions by ignoring or deliberately avoiding dung pats. Furthermore, the observed intense aggregation of earthworms beneath dung pats suggests that earthworm functions need to be assessed separately at these hot spots. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6299995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62999952018-12-20 The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures Bacher, M. G. Fenton, O. Bondi, G. Creamer, R. E. Karmarkar, M. Schmidt, O. BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: Grazed grassland management regimes can have various effects on soil fauna. For example, effects on earthworms can be negative through compaction induced by grazing animals, or positive mediated by increases in sward productivity and cattle dung pats providing a food source. Knowledge gaps exist in relation to the behaviour of different earthworm species i.e. their movement towards and aggregation under dung pats, the legacy effects of pats and the spatial area of recruitment. The present study addressed these knowledge gaps in field experiments, over 2 years, using natural and simulated dung pats on two permanent, intensively grazed pastures in Ireland. RESULTS: Dung pats strongly affected spatial earthworm distribution, with up to four times more earthworms aggregating beneath pats, than in the control locations away from pats. In these earthworm communities comprising 11 species, temporally different aggregation and dispersal patterns were observed, including absence of individual species from control locations, but no clear successional responses. Epigeic species in general, but also certain species of the anecic and endogeic groups were aggregating under dung. Sampling after complete dung pat disappearance (27 weeks after application) suggested an absence of a dung pat legacy effect on earthworm communities. Based on species distributions, the maximum size of the recruitment area from which earthworms moved to pats was estimated to be 3.8 m(2) per dung pat. Since actual grazing over 6 weeks would result in the deposition of about 300 dung pats per ha, it is estimated that a surface area of 1140 m(2) or about 11% of the total grazing area can be influenced by dung pats in a given grazing period. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the presence of dung pats in pastures creates temporary hot spots in spatial earthworm species distribution, which changes over time. The findings highlight the importance of considering dung pats, temporally and spatially, when sampling earthworms in grazed pastures. Published comparisons of grazed and cut grasslands probably reached incorrect conclusions by ignoring or deliberately avoiding dung pats. Furthermore, the observed intense aggregation of earthworms beneath dung pats suggests that earthworm functions need to be assessed separately at these hot spots. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6299995/ /pubmed/30567522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bacher, M. G. Fenton, O. Bondi, G. Creamer, R. E. Karmarkar, M. Schmidt, O. The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
title | The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
title_full | The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
title_fullStr | The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
title_short | The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
title_sort | impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6299995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0216-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bachermg theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT fentono theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT bondig theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT creamerre theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT karmarkarm theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT schmidto theimpactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT bachermg impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT fentono impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT bondig impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT creamerre impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT karmarkarm impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures AT schmidto impactofcattledungpatsonearthwormdistributioningrazedpastures |