Cargando…
Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The risk of mesothelioma has been shown to be associated with exposure to asbestos fibers. Most of the existing literature focuses on occupational exposure; however, non-occupational asbestos exposure has also been identified as an important risk factor. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the associ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0431-9 |
_version_ | 1783381604584914944 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Rengyi Barg, Frances K. Emmett, Edward A. Wiebe, Douglas J. Hwang, Wei-Ting |
author_facet | Xu, Rengyi Barg, Frances K. Emmett, Edward A. Wiebe, Douglas J. Hwang, Wei-Ting |
author_sort | Xu, Rengyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The risk of mesothelioma has been shown to be associated with exposure to asbestos fibers. Most of the existing literature focuses on occupational exposure; however, non-occupational asbestos exposure has also been identified as an important risk factor. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure, and evaluate control recruitment and exposure measurement methods. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify case-control (CC) and cohort studies that examined the association between mesothelioma and non-occupational exposure to asbestos, including neighborhood, domestic, and household exposure. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate a summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) and 95% confidence interval using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by exposure type, gender, region, and fiber type. RESULTS: Twenty CC and 7 cohort studies were selected. Controls in CC studies were selected from the general population (55%), hospital records (18%), cancer registry (23%) and a combination of population and hospital records (5%). Multiple methods were used to measure neighborhood exposure (e.g., linear distance and direction of residence from an asbestos factory), domestic (e.g., whether living with an asbestos worker) and household exposure (e.g., whether involved in asbestos-containing home improvement projects). Primary meta-analyses suggested a SRRE of mesothelioma of 5.33 (95%CI: 2.53, 11.23) from neighborhood exposure, 4.31 (95%CI, 2.58, 7.20) from domestic exposure, and 2.41 (95%CI, 1.30, 4.48) from household exposure with large I(2) statistics ranging from 83–99%. CONCLUSIONS: Non-occupational asbestos exposure is significantly associated with an elevated risk of mesothelioma. Funnel plots indicated a potential of publication bias. Some SRREs should be interpreted with cautions because of high between-studies heterogeneity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6300000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63000002018-12-20 Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, Rengyi Barg, Frances K. Emmett, Edward A. Wiebe, Douglas J. Hwang, Wei-Ting Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: The risk of mesothelioma has been shown to be associated with exposure to asbestos fibers. Most of the existing literature focuses on occupational exposure; however, non-occupational asbestos exposure has also been identified as an important risk factor. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure, and evaluate control recruitment and exposure measurement methods. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify case-control (CC) and cohort studies that examined the association between mesothelioma and non-occupational exposure to asbestos, including neighborhood, domestic, and household exposure. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate a summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) and 95% confidence interval using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by exposure type, gender, region, and fiber type. RESULTS: Twenty CC and 7 cohort studies were selected. Controls in CC studies were selected from the general population (55%), hospital records (18%), cancer registry (23%) and a combination of population and hospital records (5%). Multiple methods were used to measure neighborhood exposure (e.g., linear distance and direction of residence from an asbestos factory), domestic (e.g., whether living with an asbestos worker) and household exposure (e.g., whether involved in asbestos-containing home improvement projects). Primary meta-analyses suggested a SRRE of mesothelioma of 5.33 (95%CI: 2.53, 11.23) from neighborhood exposure, 4.31 (95%CI, 2.58, 7.20) from domestic exposure, and 2.41 (95%CI, 1.30, 4.48) from household exposure with large I(2) statistics ranging from 83–99%. CONCLUSIONS: Non-occupational asbestos exposure is significantly associated with an elevated risk of mesothelioma. Funnel plots indicated a potential of publication bias. Some SRREs should be interpreted with cautions because of high between-studies heterogeneity. BioMed Central 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6300000/ /pubmed/30567579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0431-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Xu, Rengyi Barg, Frances K. Emmett, Edward A. Wiebe, Douglas J. Hwang, Wei-Ting Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | association between mesothelioma and non-occupational asbestos exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0431-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xurengyi associationbetweenmesotheliomaandnonoccupationalasbestosexposuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bargfrancesk associationbetweenmesotheliomaandnonoccupationalasbestosexposuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT emmettedwarda associationbetweenmesotheliomaandnonoccupationalasbestosexposuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wiebedouglasj associationbetweenmesotheliomaandnonoccupationalasbestosexposuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hwangweiting associationbetweenmesotheliomaandnonoccupationalasbestosexposuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |