Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Knee pain is common in adolescents and adults and is associated with an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to gather and appraise the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions. METHOD: A s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afzali, Tamana, Fangel, Mia Vicki, Vestergaard, Anne Sig, Rathleff, Michael Skovdal, Ehlers, Lars Holger, Jensen, Martin Bach
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30566527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209240
_version_ 1783381652626472960
author Afzali, Tamana
Fangel, Mia Vicki
Vestergaard, Anne Sig
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Ehlers, Lars Holger
Jensen, Martin Bach
author_facet Afzali, Tamana
Fangel, Mia Vicki
Vestergaard, Anne Sig
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Ehlers, Lars Holger
Jensen, Martin Bach
author_sort Afzali, Tamana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Knee pain is common in adolescents and adults and is associated with an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to gather and appraise the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016050683). The literature search was done in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Study selection was carried out by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using a customized extraction form. Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. The majority regarded the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, but we also identified studies evaluating other knee pain conditions such as meniscus injuries, cartilage defects, and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Study interventions were categorized as surgical or non-surgical interventions. The surgical interventions included ACL reconstruction, chondrocyte implantation, meniscus scaffold procedure, meniscal allograft transplantation, partial meniscectomy, microfracture, and different types of autografts and allografts. The non-surgical management consisted of physical therapy, rehabilitation, exercise, counselling, bracing, and advice. In general, for ACL injuries surgical management alone or in combination with rehabilitation appeared to be cost-effective. The quality of the economic evaluations was of moderate to high quality. CONCLUSION: There was insufficient evidence to give a firm overview of cost-effective interventions for non-osteoarthritic knee pain, but surgical treatment of acute ACL injury appeared cost-effective. There is very little data regarding the cost-effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for non-traumatic knee conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6300294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63002942018-12-28 Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review Afzali, Tamana Fangel, Mia Vicki Vestergaard, Anne Sig Rathleff, Michael Skovdal Ehlers, Lars Holger Jensen, Martin Bach PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Knee pain is common in adolescents and adults and is associated with an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to gather and appraise the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016050683). The literature search was done in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Study selection was carried out by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using a customized extraction form. Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. The majority regarded the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, but we also identified studies evaluating other knee pain conditions such as meniscus injuries, cartilage defects, and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Study interventions were categorized as surgical or non-surgical interventions. The surgical interventions included ACL reconstruction, chondrocyte implantation, meniscus scaffold procedure, meniscal allograft transplantation, partial meniscectomy, microfracture, and different types of autografts and allografts. The non-surgical management consisted of physical therapy, rehabilitation, exercise, counselling, bracing, and advice. In general, for ACL injuries surgical management alone or in combination with rehabilitation appeared to be cost-effective. The quality of the economic evaluations was of moderate to high quality. CONCLUSION: There was insufficient evidence to give a firm overview of cost-effective interventions for non-osteoarthritic knee pain, but surgical treatment of acute ACL injury appeared cost-effective. There is very little data regarding the cost-effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for non-traumatic knee conditions. Public Library of Science 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6300294/ /pubmed/30566527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209240 Text en © 2018 Afzali et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Afzali, Tamana
Fangel, Mia Vicki
Vestergaard, Anne Sig
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Ehlers, Lars Holger
Jensen, Martin Bach
Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review
title Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review
title_full Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review
title_short Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review
title_sort cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30566527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209240
work_keys_str_mv AT afzalitamana costeffectivenessoftreatmentsfornonosteoarthritickneepainconditionsasystematicreview
AT fangelmiavicki costeffectivenessoftreatmentsfornonosteoarthritickneepainconditionsasystematicreview
AT vestergaardannesig costeffectivenessoftreatmentsfornonosteoarthritickneepainconditionsasystematicreview
AT rathleffmichaelskovdal costeffectivenessoftreatmentsfornonosteoarthritickneepainconditionsasystematicreview
AT ehlerslarsholger costeffectivenessoftreatmentsfornonosteoarthritickneepainconditionsasystematicreview
AT jensenmartinbach costeffectivenessoftreatmentsfornonosteoarthritickneepainconditionsasystematicreview