Cargando…

Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy

The objective of this review is to analyze the evidence supporting selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy (CP). We reviewed 85 outcome studies from 12 countries between 1990 and 2017. The published results are overwhelmingly supportive of SDR, and 39 studies for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, TS, Dobbs, Matthew B, Cho, Junsang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30585282
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3466
_version_ 1783381669774884864
author Park, TS
Dobbs, Matthew B
Cho, Junsang
author_facet Park, TS
Dobbs, Matthew B
Cho, Junsang
author_sort Park, TS
collection PubMed
description The objective of this review is to analyze the evidence supporting selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy (CP). We reviewed 85 outcome studies from 12 countries between 1990 and 2017. The published results are overwhelmingly supportive of SDR, and 39 studies form a basis for this review. Also included is some of the clinical experience of the senior author. The results show that SDR plus postoperative physiotherapy (PT) improved gait, functional independence, and self-care in children with spastic diplegia. In adults with a follow-up of 20 to 28 years, the early improvements after childhood SDR were sustained and improved quality of life. Furthermore, majority of the adults who underwent SDR as children would recommend SDR to others. On the clinical side, while SDRs through multilevel laminectomies or laminoplasty were associated with spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis, hyperlordosis, kyphosis, spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, and nonhealing of laminoplasty), SDRs through a single level laminectomy prevented SDR-related spinal problems. The outcomes of SDR specific to spastic quadriplegia require further investigation because of the relatively small patient population with quadriplegia. Lastly, we found that SDR can prevent or reverse premature aging in adolescents and adults with spastic diplegia. In conclusion, the evidence supporting the efficacy of SDR is strong, and SDR is a well-established option for spasticity management in spastic CP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6300384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63003842018-12-25 Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy Park, TS Dobbs, Matthew B Cho, Junsang Cureus Pediatrics The objective of this review is to analyze the evidence supporting selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy (CP). We reviewed 85 outcome studies from 12 countries between 1990 and 2017. The published results are overwhelmingly supportive of SDR, and 39 studies form a basis for this review. Also included is some of the clinical experience of the senior author. The results show that SDR plus postoperative physiotherapy (PT) improved gait, functional independence, and self-care in children with spastic diplegia. In adults with a follow-up of 20 to 28 years, the early improvements after childhood SDR were sustained and improved quality of life. Furthermore, majority of the adults who underwent SDR as children would recommend SDR to others. On the clinical side, while SDRs through multilevel laminectomies or laminoplasty were associated with spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis, hyperlordosis, kyphosis, spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, and nonhealing of laminoplasty), SDRs through a single level laminectomy prevented SDR-related spinal problems. The outcomes of SDR specific to spastic quadriplegia require further investigation because of the relatively small patient population with quadriplegia. Lastly, we found that SDR can prevent or reverse premature aging in adolescents and adults with spastic diplegia. In conclusion, the evidence supporting the efficacy of SDR is strong, and SDR is a well-established option for spasticity management in spastic CP. Cureus 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6300384/ /pubmed/30585282 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3466 Text en Copyright © 2018, Park et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Park, TS
Dobbs, Matthew B
Cho, Junsang
Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
title Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
title_full Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
title_fullStr Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
title_full_unstemmed Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
title_short Evidence Supporting Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Treatment of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
title_sort evidence supporting selective dorsal rhizotomy for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30585282
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3466
work_keys_str_mv AT parkts evidencesupportingselectivedorsalrhizotomyfortreatmentofspasticcerebralpalsy
AT dobbsmatthewb evidencesupportingselectivedorsalrhizotomyfortreatmentofspasticcerebralpalsy
AT chojunsang evidencesupportingselectivedorsalrhizotomyfortreatmentofspasticcerebralpalsy