Cargando…

The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review

The standard treatment for stroke risk patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, a substantial number of patients have relative or absolute contraindications to OACs due to concerns of major bleeding risk and other adverse effects while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majule, David Nehemiah, Jing, Chang, Rutahoile, Willfredius Mugishagwe, Shonyela, Felix Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962388
http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.18-00014
_version_ 1783381676464799744
author Majule, David Nehemiah
Jing, Chang
Rutahoile, Willfredius Mugishagwe
Shonyela, Felix Samuel
author_facet Majule, David Nehemiah
Jing, Chang
Rutahoile, Willfredius Mugishagwe
Shonyela, Felix Samuel
author_sort Majule, David Nehemiah
collection PubMed
description The standard treatment for stroke risk patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, a substantial number of patients have relative or absolute contraindications to OACs due to concerns of major bleeding risk and other adverse effects while using oral anticoagulation therapy. Recently, occurrences of exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with contraindication to anticoagulation therapy are widely expanding worldwide, causing major contentious discussions. The LAA is the commonest place of thrombus formation; therefore, the concept of LAA occlusion in reducing stroke and other embolic events in NVAF patients is very important. The current understanding of the available evidence on efficacy and safety of LAA closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device in patients contraindicated to OACs is the major aim of this focused review. After reviewing a significant body of literature, a world experience with no randomized trials, it is suggested that Watchman device implantation is effective and safe in high-risk patients with NVAF contraindicated to OACs therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6300422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63004222019-01-21 The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review Majule, David Nehemiah Jing, Chang Rutahoile, Willfredius Mugishagwe Shonyela, Felix Samuel Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Review Article The standard treatment for stroke risk patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, a substantial number of patients have relative or absolute contraindications to OACs due to concerns of major bleeding risk and other adverse effects while using oral anticoagulation therapy. Recently, occurrences of exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with contraindication to anticoagulation therapy are widely expanding worldwide, causing major contentious discussions. The LAA is the commonest place of thrombus formation; therefore, the concept of LAA occlusion in reducing stroke and other embolic events in NVAF patients is very important. The current understanding of the available evidence on efficacy and safety of LAA closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device in patients contraindicated to OACs is the major aim of this focused review. After reviewing a significant body of literature, a world experience with no randomized trials, it is suggested that Watchman device implantation is effective and safe in high-risk patients with NVAF contraindicated to OACs therapy. The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2018-06-29 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6300422/ /pubmed/29962388 http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.18-00014 Text en ©2018 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivatives International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Article
Majule, David Nehemiah
Jing, Chang
Rutahoile, Willfredius Mugishagwe
Shonyela, Felix Samuel
The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review
title The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review
title_sort efficacy and safety of the watchman device in laa occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation contraindicated to oral anticoagulation: a focused review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962388
http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.18-00014
work_keys_str_mv AT majuledavidnehemiah theefficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT jingchang theefficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT rutahoilewillfrediusmugishagwe theefficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT shonyelafelixsamuel theefficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT majuledavidnehemiah efficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT jingchang efficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT rutahoilewillfrediusmugishagwe efficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview
AT shonyelafelixsamuel efficacyandsafetyofthewatchmandeviceinlaaocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcontraindicatedtooralanticoagulationafocusedreview