Cargando…

Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models

Background and purpose — Teriparatide accelerates fracture healing in animals and probably in man. Abaloparatide is a new drug with similar although not identical effects on the teriparatide receptor. Given at 4 times the teriparatide dose in a human osteoporosis trial, abaloparatide increased bone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernhardsson, Magnus, Aspenberg, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30334479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1523771
_version_ 1783381728171130880
author Bernhardsson, Magnus
Aspenberg, Per
author_facet Bernhardsson, Magnus
Aspenberg, Per
author_sort Bernhardsson, Magnus
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — Teriparatide accelerates fracture healing in animals and probably in man. Abaloparatide is a new drug with similar although not identical effects on the teriparatide receptor. Given at 4 times the teriparatide dose in a human osteoporosis trial, abaloparatide increased bone density more than teriparatide, and both reduced fracture risk. We investigated in mice whether abaloparatide stimulates fracture healing, and if it does so with the suggested dose effect relation (4:1). Patients and methods — In a validated mouse model for metaphyseal healing (burr hole with screw pull-out), 96 mice were randomly allocated to 11 groups: control (saline), teriparatide or abaloparatide, where teriparatide and abaloparatide were given at 5 different doses each. In a femoral shaft osteotomy model, 24 mice were randomly allocated to 3 groups: control (saline), teriparatide (15 µg/kg) or abaloparatide (60 µg/kg). Each treatment was given daily via subcutaneous injections. Results were evaluated by mechanical testing and microCT. Results — In the metaphyseal model, a dose-dependent increase in screw pull-out force could be seen. In a linear regression analysis (r = 0.78) each increase in ln(dose) by 1 (regardless of drug type) was associated with an increase in pull-out force by 1.50 N (SE 0.18) (p < 0.001). Changing drug from teriparatide to abaloparatide increased the force by 1.41 N (SE 0.60; p = 0.02). In the diaphyseal model, the callus density was 23% (SD 10), 38% (SD 10), and 47% (SD 2) for control, for teriparatide and abaloparatide respectively. Both drugs were significantly different from controls (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008), but not from each other. Interpretation — Both drugs improve fracture healing, but in these mouse models, the potency per µg of abaloparatide seems only 2.5 times that of teriparatide, rather than the 4:1 relation chosen in the clinical abaloparatide–teriparatide comparison trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6300720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63007202019-01-07 Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models Bernhardsson, Magnus Aspenberg, Per Acta Orthop Article Background and purpose — Teriparatide accelerates fracture healing in animals and probably in man. Abaloparatide is a new drug with similar although not identical effects on the teriparatide receptor. Given at 4 times the teriparatide dose in a human osteoporosis trial, abaloparatide increased bone density more than teriparatide, and both reduced fracture risk. We investigated in mice whether abaloparatide stimulates fracture healing, and if it does so with the suggested dose effect relation (4:1). Patients and methods — In a validated mouse model for metaphyseal healing (burr hole with screw pull-out), 96 mice were randomly allocated to 11 groups: control (saline), teriparatide or abaloparatide, where teriparatide and abaloparatide were given at 5 different doses each. In a femoral shaft osteotomy model, 24 mice were randomly allocated to 3 groups: control (saline), teriparatide (15 µg/kg) or abaloparatide (60 µg/kg). Each treatment was given daily via subcutaneous injections. Results were evaluated by mechanical testing and microCT. Results — In the metaphyseal model, a dose-dependent increase in screw pull-out force could be seen. In a linear regression analysis (r = 0.78) each increase in ln(dose) by 1 (regardless of drug type) was associated with an increase in pull-out force by 1.50 N (SE 0.18) (p < 0.001). Changing drug from teriparatide to abaloparatide increased the force by 1.41 N (SE 0.60; p = 0.02). In the diaphyseal model, the callus density was 23% (SD 10), 38% (SD 10), and 47% (SD 2) for control, for teriparatide and abaloparatide respectively. Both drugs were significantly different from controls (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008), but not from each other. Interpretation — Both drugs improve fracture healing, but in these mouse models, the potency per µg of abaloparatide seems only 2.5 times that of teriparatide, rather than the 4:1 relation chosen in the clinical abaloparatide–teriparatide comparison trial. Taylor & Francis 2018-12 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6300720/ /pubmed/30334479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1523771 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
spellingShingle Article
Bernhardsson, Magnus
Aspenberg, Per
Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
title Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
title_full Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
title_fullStr Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
title_full_unstemmed Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
title_short Abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
title_sort abaloparatide versus teriparatide: a head to head comparison of effects on fracture healing in mouse models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30334479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1523771
work_keys_str_mv AT bernhardssonmagnus abaloparatideversusteriparatideaheadtoheadcomparisonofeffectsonfracturehealinginmousemodels
AT aspenbergper abaloparatideversusteriparatideaheadtoheadcomparisonofeffectsonfracturehealinginmousemodels