Cargando…

Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center

PURPOSE: To monitor the outcomes of surgical correction of esotropia in order to improve preoperative counselling for patients and their families. METHODS: A retrospective review audit of the medical charts at King Fahad Medical City. All patients treated surgically to correct esotropia, from Januar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sulayem, Lujain M., Bin-Khathlan, Afaf A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.07.006
_version_ 1783381733512577024
author Sulayem, Lujain M.
Bin-Khathlan, Afaf A.
author_facet Sulayem, Lujain M.
Bin-Khathlan, Afaf A.
author_sort Sulayem, Lujain M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To monitor the outcomes of surgical correction of esotropia in order to improve preoperative counselling for patients and their families. METHODS: A retrospective review audit of the medical charts at King Fahad Medical City. All patients treated surgically to correct esotropia, from January 2007 to December 2013. All operated cases were included regardless of age and esotropia etiology. The study used a goal-determined metric to assess the outcomes of strabismus surgery > 6 months post-operatively, and on last follow-up. The risk factors for poor surgical outcomes were identified using a Pareto chart. RESULTS: A total of 99 cases with sufficient documentation to determine the surgical goal were included in the analysis. The goal was to improve eye contact (cosmetic correction) in 77.8% cases, to establish binocularity in 15.2% cases, to resolve diplopia for 4% cases, and to improve anomalous head posture for 3%. The overall outcome was excellent for 70.7% at the first follow-up and for 57.6% at the final visit. Simultaneous vertical muscle surgery and/or superior oblique muscle palsy were risk factors for poor outcome (odds ratio 3.15, 95% CI 1.11–8.99). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcome of esotropia surgery in this study is comparable to outcomes reported internationally using the goal determined metrics. Quality improvement processes like the Pareto chart are simple to use and helpful for determining the risk factors associated with poor surgical outcomes after esotropia correction from different etiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6300749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63007492018-12-21 Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center Sulayem, Lujain M. Bin-Khathlan, Afaf A. Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To monitor the outcomes of surgical correction of esotropia in order to improve preoperative counselling for patients and their families. METHODS: A retrospective review audit of the medical charts at King Fahad Medical City. All patients treated surgically to correct esotropia, from January 2007 to December 2013. All operated cases were included regardless of age and esotropia etiology. The study used a goal-determined metric to assess the outcomes of strabismus surgery > 6 months post-operatively, and on last follow-up. The risk factors for poor surgical outcomes were identified using a Pareto chart. RESULTS: A total of 99 cases with sufficient documentation to determine the surgical goal were included in the analysis. The goal was to improve eye contact (cosmetic correction) in 77.8% cases, to establish binocularity in 15.2% cases, to resolve diplopia for 4% cases, and to improve anomalous head posture for 3%. The overall outcome was excellent for 70.7% at the first follow-up and for 57.6% at the final visit. Simultaneous vertical muscle surgery and/or superior oblique muscle palsy were risk factors for poor outcome (odds ratio 3.15, 95% CI 1.11–8.99). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcome of esotropia surgery in this study is comparable to outcomes reported internationally using the goal determined metrics. Quality improvement processes like the Pareto chart are simple to use and helpful for determining the risk factors associated with poor surgical outcomes after esotropia correction from different etiology. Elsevier 2018 2018-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6300749/ /pubmed/30581297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.07.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sulayem, Lujain M.
Bin-Khathlan, Afaf A.
Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center
title Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center
title_full Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center
title_fullStr Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center
title_short Outcomes of esotropia surgery in Saudi Arabia: An audit from a single center
title_sort outcomes of esotropia surgery in saudi arabia: an audit from a single center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.07.006
work_keys_str_mv AT sulayemlujainm outcomesofesotropiasurgeryinsaudiarabiaanauditfromasinglecenter
AT binkhathlanafafa outcomesofesotropiasurgeryinsaudiarabiaanauditfromasinglecenter