Cargando…

Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT

INTRODUCTION: [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL show a high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. While (18)F-based tracers have several advantages in availability and image resolution, their sensitivity in the skeleton might be impaired by released [(18)F]fluoride due to it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammes, Jochen, Hohberg, Melanie, Täger, Philipp, Wild, Markus, Zlatopolskiy, Boris, Krapf, Philipp, Neumaier, Bernd, Schomäcker, Klaus, Kobe, Carsten, Schmidt, Matthias, Dietlein, Markus, Drzezga, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613
_version_ 1783381842833965056
author Hammes, Jochen
Hohberg, Melanie
Täger, Philipp
Wild, Markus
Zlatopolskiy, Boris
Krapf, Philipp
Neumaier, Bernd
Schomäcker, Klaus
Kobe, Carsten
Schmidt, Matthias
Dietlein, Markus
Drzezga, Alexander
author_facet Hammes, Jochen
Hohberg, Melanie
Täger, Philipp
Wild, Markus
Zlatopolskiy, Boris
Krapf, Philipp
Neumaier, Bernd
Schomäcker, Klaus
Kobe, Carsten
Schmidt, Matthias
Dietlein, Markus
Drzezga, Alexander
author_sort Hammes, Jochen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL show a high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. While (18)F-based tracers have several advantages in availability and image resolution, their sensitivity in the skeleton might be impaired by released [(18)F]fluoride due to its high bone affinity. In turn, chemically unbound trivalent (68)Ga might also accumulate in osseous tissue, in cases of occupied binding sites of plasma proteins and thereby influence bone signal. METHODS: A comparison of average bone SUV was performed in 17 bone-negative and 4 bone-positive patients. All patients underwent PET/CT 125 minutes after application of [(18)F]DCFPyL and 73 minutes after application of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC at another date. RESULTS: Native SUVs in unaffected bone tissue and SUVs relative to liver uptake were lower in [(18)F]DCFPyL (0.49) than in [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans (0.52). SUVs relative to gluteal muscles did not differ between the two tracers. Average lesional SUVs did not differ between tracers. CONCLUSION: No difference of average bone signal intensity was observed for [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET/CT in comparison to [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans indicating that diagnostic assessment of the skeleton is not affected by non-specific accumulation of free [(18)F]fluoride or (68)Ga.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6301686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63016862019-01-08 Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT Hammes, Jochen Hohberg, Melanie Täger, Philipp Wild, Markus Zlatopolskiy, Boris Krapf, Philipp Neumaier, Bernd Schomäcker, Klaus Kobe, Carsten Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Markus Drzezga, Alexander PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL show a high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. While (18)F-based tracers have several advantages in availability and image resolution, their sensitivity in the skeleton might be impaired by released [(18)F]fluoride due to its high bone affinity. In turn, chemically unbound trivalent (68)Ga might also accumulate in osseous tissue, in cases of occupied binding sites of plasma proteins and thereby influence bone signal. METHODS: A comparison of average bone SUV was performed in 17 bone-negative and 4 bone-positive patients. All patients underwent PET/CT 125 minutes after application of [(18)F]DCFPyL and 73 minutes after application of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC at another date. RESULTS: Native SUVs in unaffected bone tissue and SUVs relative to liver uptake were lower in [(18)F]DCFPyL (0.49) than in [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans (0.52). SUVs relative to gluteal muscles did not differ between the two tracers. Average lesional SUVs did not differ between tracers. CONCLUSION: No difference of average bone signal intensity was observed for [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET/CT in comparison to [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans indicating that diagnostic assessment of the skeleton is not affected by non-specific accumulation of free [(18)F]fluoride or (68)Ga. Public Library of Science 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6301686/ /pubmed/30571794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613 Text en © 2018 Hammes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hammes, Jochen
Hohberg, Melanie
Täger, Philipp
Wild, Markus
Zlatopolskiy, Boris
Krapf, Philipp
Neumaier, Bernd
Schomäcker, Klaus
Kobe, Carsten
Schmidt, Matthias
Dietlein, Markus
Drzezga, Alexander
Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
title Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
title_full Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
title_fullStr Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
title_short Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
title_sort uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)f]-dcfpyl and [(68)ga]-hbed-cc psma pet/ct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613
work_keys_str_mv AT hammesjochen uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT hohbergmelanie uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT tagerphilipp uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT wildmarkus uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT zlatopolskiyboris uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT krapfphilipp uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT neumaierbernd uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT schomackerklaus uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT kobecarsten uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT schmidtmatthias uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT dietleinmarkus uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct
AT drzezgaalexander uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct