Cargando…
Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT
INTRODUCTION: [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL show a high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. While (18)F-based tracers have several advantages in availability and image resolution, their sensitivity in the skeleton might be impaired by released [(18)F]fluoride due to it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613 |
_version_ | 1783381842833965056 |
---|---|
author | Hammes, Jochen Hohberg, Melanie Täger, Philipp Wild, Markus Zlatopolskiy, Boris Krapf, Philipp Neumaier, Bernd Schomäcker, Klaus Kobe, Carsten Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Markus Drzezga, Alexander |
author_facet | Hammes, Jochen Hohberg, Melanie Täger, Philipp Wild, Markus Zlatopolskiy, Boris Krapf, Philipp Neumaier, Bernd Schomäcker, Klaus Kobe, Carsten Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Markus Drzezga, Alexander |
author_sort | Hammes, Jochen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL show a high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. While (18)F-based tracers have several advantages in availability and image resolution, their sensitivity in the skeleton might be impaired by released [(18)F]fluoride due to its high bone affinity. In turn, chemically unbound trivalent (68)Ga might also accumulate in osseous tissue, in cases of occupied binding sites of plasma proteins and thereby influence bone signal. METHODS: A comparison of average bone SUV was performed in 17 bone-negative and 4 bone-positive patients. All patients underwent PET/CT 125 minutes after application of [(18)F]DCFPyL and 73 minutes after application of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC at another date. RESULTS: Native SUVs in unaffected bone tissue and SUVs relative to liver uptake were lower in [(18)F]DCFPyL (0.49) than in [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans (0.52). SUVs relative to gluteal muscles did not differ between the two tracers. Average lesional SUVs did not differ between tracers. CONCLUSION: No difference of average bone signal intensity was observed for [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET/CT in comparison to [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans indicating that diagnostic assessment of the skeleton is not affected by non-specific accumulation of free [(18)F]fluoride or (68)Ga. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6301686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63016862019-01-08 Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT Hammes, Jochen Hohberg, Melanie Täger, Philipp Wild, Markus Zlatopolskiy, Boris Krapf, Philipp Neumaier, Bernd Schomäcker, Klaus Kobe, Carsten Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Markus Drzezga, Alexander PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL show a high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. While (18)F-based tracers have several advantages in availability and image resolution, their sensitivity in the skeleton might be impaired by released [(18)F]fluoride due to its high bone affinity. In turn, chemically unbound trivalent (68)Ga might also accumulate in osseous tissue, in cases of occupied binding sites of plasma proteins and thereby influence bone signal. METHODS: A comparison of average bone SUV was performed in 17 bone-negative and 4 bone-positive patients. All patients underwent PET/CT 125 minutes after application of [(18)F]DCFPyL and 73 minutes after application of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC at another date. RESULTS: Native SUVs in unaffected bone tissue and SUVs relative to liver uptake were lower in [(18)F]DCFPyL (0.49) than in [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans (0.52). SUVs relative to gluteal muscles did not differ between the two tracers. Average lesional SUVs did not differ between tracers. CONCLUSION: No difference of average bone signal intensity was observed for [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET/CT in comparison to [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC scans indicating that diagnostic assessment of the skeleton is not affected by non-specific accumulation of free [(18)F]fluoride or (68)Ga. Public Library of Science 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6301686/ /pubmed/30571794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613 Text en © 2018 Hammes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hammes, Jochen Hohberg, Melanie Täger, Philipp Wild, Markus Zlatopolskiy, Boris Krapf, Philipp Neumaier, Bernd Schomäcker, Klaus Kobe, Carsten Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Markus Drzezga, Alexander Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT |
title | Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT |
title_full | Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT |
title_fullStr | Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT |
title_short | Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)F]-DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT |
title_sort | uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [(18)f]-dcfpyl and [(68)ga]-hbed-cc psma pet/ct |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammesjochen uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT hohbergmelanie uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT tagerphilipp uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT wildmarkus uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT zlatopolskiyboris uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT krapfphilipp uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT neumaierbernd uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT schomackerklaus uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT kobecarsten uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT schmidtmatthias uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT dietleinmarkus uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct AT drzezgaalexander uptakeinnonaffectedbonetissuedoesnotdifferbetween18fdcfpyland68gahbedccpsmapetct |