Cargando…

Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers

BACKGROUND: After the publication in 1985 of Injury in America and the establishment of an injury center at the Centers for Disease Control, there was a concerted attempt to create an “injury field.” MAIN BODY: Thirty-six (36) pioneers in the injury prevention field responded to questions about the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hemenway, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0177-4
_version_ 1783381880065753088
author Hemenway, David
author_facet Hemenway, David
author_sort Hemenway, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After the publication in 1985 of Injury in America and the establishment of an injury center at the Centers for Disease Control, there was a concerted attempt to create an “injury field.” MAIN BODY: Thirty-six (36) pioneers in the injury prevention field responded to questions about the major accomplishments and failures of their profession since the publication of the seminal Institute of Medicine report Injury in America in 1985. Much has been accomplished. Indeed, it is difficult to believe that before the 1990s there was no federal agency focused on preventing fall injuries, drownings, sport concussions or bullying in schools. There was no readily available surveillance data on fatal injuries, no national associations of injury researchers or practitioners, no American Public Health Association (APHA) injury and emergency health services (ICEHS) section and few injury journals. Hardly anyone wore seatbelts and virtually no cigarettes were fire-safe. Sadly, there has been little success at limiting firearm and overdose deaths as injury prevention remains a step-child in the health field with funding not nearly commensurate to the size of the problem. Training in effective advocacy has been proposed both to help attract funding and reduce injuries. CONCLUSION: Injury prevention pioneers have much to teach current public health students, researchers and practitioners about the history and future of the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6301898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63018982019-01-04 Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers Hemenway, David Inj Epidemiol Commentary BACKGROUND: After the publication in 1985 of Injury in America and the establishment of an injury center at the Centers for Disease Control, there was a concerted attempt to create an “injury field.” MAIN BODY: Thirty-six (36) pioneers in the injury prevention field responded to questions about the major accomplishments and failures of their profession since the publication of the seminal Institute of Medicine report Injury in America in 1985. Much has been accomplished. Indeed, it is difficult to believe that before the 1990s there was no federal agency focused on preventing fall injuries, drownings, sport concussions or bullying in schools. There was no readily available surveillance data on fatal injuries, no national associations of injury researchers or practitioners, no American Public Health Association (APHA) injury and emergency health services (ICEHS) section and few injury journals. Hardly anyone wore seatbelts and virtually no cigarettes were fire-safe. Sadly, there has been little success at limiting firearm and overdose deaths as injury prevention remains a step-child in the health field with funding not nearly commensurate to the size of the problem. Training in effective advocacy has been proposed both to help attract funding and reduce injuries. CONCLUSION: Injury prevention pioneers have much to teach current public health students, researchers and practitioners about the history and future of the field. Springer International Publishing 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6301898/ /pubmed/30574666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0177-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Commentary
Hemenway, David
Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
title Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
title_full Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
title_fullStr Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
title_full_unstemmed Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
title_short Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
title_sort building the injury field in north america: the perspective of some of the pioneers
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0177-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hemenwaydavid buildingtheinjuryfieldinnorthamericatheperspectiveofsomeofthepioneers