Cargando…
Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of shoulder mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotato...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0380-7 |
_version_ | 1783381969708515328 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Jonathan A. Merritt, Naomi Rees, Jonathan L. Crocker, Joanna C. Hopewell, Sally Dritsaki, Melina Beard, David J. Rangan, Amar Cooper, Cushla Kottam, Lucksy Farrar-Hockley, Dair Thomas, Michael Earle, Robert Carr, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Cook, Jonathan A. Merritt, Naomi Rees, Jonathan L. Crocker, Joanna C. Hopewell, Sally Dritsaki, Melina Beard, David J. Rangan, Amar Cooper, Cushla Kottam, Lucksy Farrar-Hockley, Dair Thomas, Michael Earle, Robert Carr, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Cook, Jonathan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of shoulder mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery and the use of patch augmentation to provide support to the healing process and improve patient outcomes holds new promise. Patches have been made using different materials (e.g. human/animal skin or intestine tissue, and completely synthetic materials) and processes (e.g. woven or a mesh). However, clinical evidence on their use is limited. The aim of the patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study is to determine, using a mixed method approach, the design of a definitive randomised trial assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and feasible. METHODS: The objectives of this six-stage mixed methods feasibility study are to determine current practice, evidence and views about patch use; achieve consensus on the design of a randomised trial to evaluate patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery; and assess the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed design. The six stages will involve a systematic review of clinical evidence, two surveys of surgeons, focus groups and interviews with stakeholders, a Delphi study and a consensus meeting. The various stakeholders (including patients, surgeons, and representatives from industry, the NHS and regulatory bodies) will be involved across the six stages. DISCUSSION: The PARCS feasibility study will inform the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery. Consensus opinion on the basic design of a randomised trial will be sought. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0380-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6302398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63023982018-12-31 Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study Cook, Jonathan A. Merritt, Naomi Rees, Jonathan L. Crocker, Joanna C. Hopewell, Sally Dritsaki, Melina Beard, David J. Rangan, Amar Cooper, Cushla Kottam, Lucksy Farrar-Hockley, Dair Thomas, Michael Earle, Robert Carr, Andrew J. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of shoulder mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery and the use of patch augmentation to provide support to the healing process and improve patient outcomes holds new promise. Patches have been made using different materials (e.g. human/animal skin or intestine tissue, and completely synthetic materials) and processes (e.g. woven or a mesh). However, clinical evidence on their use is limited. The aim of the patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study is to determine, using a mixed method approach, the design of a definitive randomised trial assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and feasible. METHODS: The objectives of this six-stage mixed methods feasibility study are to determine current practice, evidence and views about patch use; achieve consensus on the design of a randomised trial to evaluate patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery; and assess the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed design. The six stages will involve a systematic review of clinical evidence, two surveys of surgeons, focus groups and interviews with stakeholders, a Delphi study and a consensus meeting. The various stakeholders (including patients, surgeons, and representatives from industry, the NHS and regulatory bodies) will be involved across the six stages. DISCUSSION: The PARCS feasibility study will inform the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery. Consensus opinion on the basic design of a randomised trial will be sought. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0380-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6302398/ /pubmed/30598834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0380-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Cook, Jonathan A. Merritt, Naomi Rees, Jonathan L. Crocker, Joanna C. Hopewell, Sally Dritsaki, Melina Beard, David J. Rangan, Amar Cooper, Cushla Kottam, Lucksy Farrar-Hockley, Dair Thomas, Michael Earle, Robert Carr, Andrew J. Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
title | Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
title_full | Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
title_short | Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
title_sort | patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (parcs) study—protocol for a feasibility study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0380-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookjonathana patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT merrittnaomi patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT reesjonathanl patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT crockerjoannac patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT hopewellsally patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT dritsakimelina patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT bearddavidj patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT ranganamar patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT coopercushla patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT kottamlucksy patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT farrarhockleydair patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT thomasmichael patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT earlerobert patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy AT carrandrewj patchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsstudyprotocolforafeasibilitystudy |