Cargando…
Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion
BACKGROUND: Texts and interpretations on the lawfulness of abortion and associated administrative requirements can be vague and confusing. It can also be difficult for a woman or provider to know exactly where to look for and how to interpret laws on abortion. To increase transparency, the Global Ab...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-018-0183-1 |
_version_ | 1783381974935666688 |
---|---|
author | Lavelanet, Antonella F. Schlitt, Stephanie Johnson, Brooke Ronald Ganatra, Bela |
author_facet | Lavelanet, Antonella F. Schlitt, Stephanie Johnson, Brooke Ronald Ganatra, Bela |
author_sort | Lavelanet, Antonella F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Texts and interpretations on the lawfulness of abortion and associated administrative requirements can be vague and confusing. It can also be difficult for a woman or provider to know exactly where to look for and how to interpret laws on abortion. To increase transparency, the Global Abortion Policies Database (GAPD), launched in 2017, facilitates the strengthening of knowledge and understanding of the complexities and nuances around lawful abortion as explicitly stated in laws and policies. METHODS: We report on data available in the GAPD as of May 2018. We reviewed the content and wording of laws, policies, standards and guidelines, judgments and other official statements for all countries where data is available in the GAPD. We analyzed data for 158 countries, where abortion is lawful on the woman’s request with no requirement for justification and/or for at least one legal ground, including additional indications that are nonequivalent to a single common legal ground. We classified laws on the basis of the explicit wording of the text. The GAPD treats legal categories as the circumstances under which abortion is lawful, that is, allowed or not contrary to law, or explicitly permitted or specified by law. RESULTS: 32% of countries allow or permit abortion at the woman’s request with no requirement for justification. Approximately 82% of countries allow or permit abortion to save the woman’s life. 64% of countries specify health, physical health and/or mental (or psychological) health. 51% allow or permit abortion based on a fetal condition, 46% of countries allow or permit abortion where the pregnancy is the result of rape, and 10% specify an economic or social ground. Laws may also specify several additional indications that are nonequivalent to a single legal ground. CONCLUSIONS: The GAPD reflects details that exist within countries’ laws and highlights the nuance within legal categories of abortion; no assumptions are made as to how laws are interpreted or applied in practice. By examining the text of the law, additional complexities related to the legal categories of abortion become more apparent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6302420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63024202018-12-31 Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion Lavelanet, Antonella F. Schlitt, Stephanie Johnson, Brooke Ronald Ganatra, Bela BMC Int Health Hum Rights Research Article BACKGROUND: Texts and interpretations on the lawfulness of abortion and associated administrative requirements can be vague and confusing. It can also be difficult for a woman or provider to know exactly where to look for and how to interpret laws on abortion. To increase transparency, the Global Abortion Policies Database (GAPD), launched in 2017, facilitates the strengthening of knowledge and understanding of the complexities and nuances around lawful abortion as explicitly stated in laws and policies. METHODS: We report on data available in the GAPD as of May 2018. We reviewed the content and wording of laws, policies, standards and guidelines, judgments and other official statements for all countries where data is available in the GAPD. We analyzed data for 158 countries, where abortion is lawful on the woman’s request with no requirement for justification and/or for at least one legal ground, including additional indications that are nonequivalent to a single common legal ground. We classified laws on the basis of the explicit wording of the text. The GAPD treats legal categories as the circumstances under which abortion is lawful, that is, allowed or not contrary to law, or explicitly permitted or specified by law. RESULTS: 32% of countries allow or permit abortion at the woman’s request with no requirement for justification. Approximately 82% of countries allow or permit abortion to save the woman’s life. 64% of countries specify health, physical health and/or mental (or psychological) health. 51% allow or permit abortion based on a fetal condition, 46% of countries allow or permit abortion where the pregnancy is the result of rape, and 10% specify an economic or social ground. Laws may also specify several additional indications that are nonequivalent to a single legal ground. CONCLUSIONS: The GAPD reflects details that exist within countries’ laws and highlights the nuance within legal categories of abortion; no assumptions are made as to how laws are interpreted or applied in practice. By examining the text of the law, additional complexities related to the legal categories of abortion become more apparent. BioMed Central 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6302420/ /pubmed/30572956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-018-0183-1 Text en © World Health Organization; licensee BioMed Central. 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organisation or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lavelanet, Antonella F. Schlitt, Stephanie Johnson, Brooke Ronald Ganatra, Bela Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
title | Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
title_full | Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
title_fullStr | Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
title_full_unstemmed | Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
title_short | Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
title_sort | global abortion policies database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-018-0183-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lavelanetantonellaf globalabortionpoliciesdatabaseadescriptiveanalysisofthelegalcategoriesoflawfulabortion AT schlittstephanie globalabortionpoliciesdatabaseadescriptiveanalysisofthelegalcategoriesoflawfulabortion AT johnsonbrookeronald globalabortionpoliciesdatabaseadescriptiveanalysisofthelegalcategoriesoflawfulabortion AT ganatrabela globalabortionpoliciesdatabaseadescriptiveanalysisofthelegalcategoriesoflawfulabortion |