Cargando…

Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and young people is high but despite this, many doctors have difficulty identifying and managing psychiatric disorders presenting in this age group. The purpose of this study was to determine appropriate curriculum content in Child and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salmon, Gill, Tombs, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4
_version_ 1783381987062448128
author Salmon, Gill
Tombs, Michal
author_facet Salmon, Gill
Tombs, Michal
author_sort Salmon, Gill
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and young people is high but despite this, many doctors have difficulty identifying and managing psychiatric disorders presenting in this age group. The purpose of this study was to determine appropriate curriculum content in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP) for a Graduate Entry Medicine (GEM) course. Doctors with a background in primary care who were also involved in undergraduate teaching rated how necessary they considered a number of knowledge, skills and attitudes items were for inclusion in the CAP curriculum. METHODS: An online questionnaire study was carried out using modified Delphi methodology in two rounds. The questionnaire was derived from a list of CAP learning objectives and/or curricular content obtained from a thorough review of the literature. 23 of the 24 doctors who had agreed to participate went on to complete the round one questionnaire (95.8% response rate) with 19 also completing round 2 (82.6%). Where there was high agreement (70% or more) amongst participants, items were considered as having sufficient consensus to either accept or reject them. Mean scores were then used as a way to prioritise items. RESULTS: At the end of round two, there was consensus to consider including 26 of the 34 knowledge items, 16 of the 20 skills items and three of the four attitudes items in the CAP curriculum. The most highly rated knowledge, skills and attitudes items were depression/ suicide; communicating with children, young people and families; and rapport building. The majority (83.3%) of round two responders, considered that the current amount of CAP teaching time was “too little”. CONCLUSIONS: Delphi methodology proved useful for determining consensus and the priority rankings of the CAP knowledge, skills and attitudes items can now be used to help educators determine which topics to focus upon. The study findings support the need for additional CAP teaching time in the GEM curriculum and will help to shape new CAP content. Additional formal CAP teaching time has already been incorporated into the psychiatry speciality attachment, a new clinical skills session has been developed and CAP topics have been introduced into written and clinical examinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6302471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63024712018-12-31 Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content Salmon, Gill Tombs, Michal BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and young people is high but despite this, many doctors have difficulty identifying and managing psychiatric disorders presenting in this age group. The purpose of this study was to determine appropriate curriculum content in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP) for a Graduate Entry Medicine (GEM) course. Doctors with a background in primary care who were also involved in undergraduate teaching rated how necessary they considered a number of knowledge, skills and attitudes items were for inclusion in the CAP curriculum. METHODS: An online questionnaire study was carried out using modified Delphi methodology in two rounds. The questionnaire was derived from a list of CAP learning objectives and/or curricular content obtained from a thorough review of the literature. 23 of the 24 doctors who had agreed to participate went on to complete the round one questionnaire (95.8% response rate) with 19 also completing round 2 (82.6%). Where there was high agreement (70% or more) amongst participants, items were considered as having sufficient consensus to either accept or reject them. Mean scores were then used as a way to prioritise items. RESULTS: At the end of round two, there was consensus to consider including 26 of the 34 knowledge items, 16 of the 20 skills items and three of the four attitudes items in the CAP curriculum. The most highly rated knowledge, skills and attitudes items were depression/ suicide; communicating with children, young people and families; and rapport building. The majority (83.3%) of round two responders, considered that the current amount of CAP teaching time was “too little”. CONCLUSIONS: Delphi methodology proved useful for determining consensus and the priority rankings of the CAP knowledge, skills and attitudes items can now be used to help educators determine which topics to focus upon. The study findings support the need for additional CAP teaching time in the GEM curriculum and will help to shape new CAP content. Additional formal CAP teaching time has already been incorporated into the psychiatry speciality attachment, a new clinical skills session has been developed and CAP topics have been introduced into written and clinical examinations. BioMed Central 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6302471/ /pubmed/30572900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salmon, Gill
Tombs, Michal
Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content
title Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content
title_full Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content
title_fullStr Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content
title_full_unstemmed Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content
title_short Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content
title_sort teaching undergraduate medical students child and adolescent psychiatry (cap): a delphi study on curriculum content
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4
work_keys_str_mv AT salmongill teachingundergraduatemedicalstudentschildandadolescentpsychiatrycapadelphistudyoncurriculumcontent
AT tombsmichal teachingundergraduatemedicalstudentschildandadolescentpsychiatrycapadelphistudyoncurriculumcontent