Cargando…

Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses

BACKGROUND: Our picture of behavioral management of risk by prey remains fragmentary. This partly stems from a lack of studies jointly analyzing different behavioral responses developed by prey, such as habitat use and fine-scale behavior, although they are expected to complement each other. We took...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanchard, Pierrick, Lauzeral, Christine, Chamaillé-Jammes, Simon, Brunet, Clément, Lec’hvien, Arnaud, Péron, Guillaume, Pontier, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0215-7
_version_ 1783381987997777920
author Blanchard, Pierrick
Lauzeral, Christine
Chamaillé-Jammes, Simon
Brunet, Clément
Lec’hvien, Arnaud
Péron, Guillaume
Pontier, Dominique
author_facet Blanchard, Pierrick
Lauzeral, Christine
Chamaillé-Jammes, Simon
Brunet, Clément
Lec’hvien, Arnaud
Péron, Guillaume
Pontier, Dominique
author_sort Blanchard, Pierrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our picture of behavioral management of risk by prey remains fragmentary. This partly stems from a lack of studies jointly analyzing different behavioral responses developed by prey, such as habitat use and fine-scale behavior, although they are expected to complement each other. We took advantage of a simple system on the Kerguelen archipelago, made of a prey species, European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, a predator, feral cat Felis catus, and a mosaic of closed and open foraging patches, allowing reliable assessment of spatio-temporal change in predation risk. We investigated the way such a change triggered individual prey decisions on where, when and how to perform routine activities. RESULTS: Rabbit presence and behavior were recorded both day and night in patches with similar foraging characteristics, but contrasted in terms of openness. Cats, individually recognizable, were more active at night and in closed patches, in line with their expected higher hunting success in those conditions. Accordingly, rabbits avoided using closed patches at night and increased their vigilance if they did. Both day and night, rabbits increased their use of closed patches as compared to open patches in windy conditions, thereby probably reducing the thermoregulatory costs expected under such harsh environmental conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data map the landscape of fear in this study system and indicate that prey habitat use and vigilance complement each other. Solely focusing on one or the other tactic may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the way predation risk triggers prey decisions. Finally, future studies should investigate inter-individual variability in the relative use of these different types of complementary behavioral responses to perceived risk, along with the determinants and outcomes of such tactics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6302475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63024752018-12-31 Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses Blanchard, Pierrick Lauzeral, Christine Chamaillé-Jammes, Simon Brunet, Clément Lec’hvien, Arnaud Péron, Guillaume Pontier, Dominique BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: Our picture of behavioral management of risk by prey remains fragmentary. This partly stems from a lack of studies jointly analyzing different behavioral responses developed by prey, such as habitat use and fine-scale behavior, although they are expected to complement each other. We took advantage of a simple system on the Kerguelen archipelago, made of a prey species, European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, a predator, feral cat Felis catus, and a mosaic of closed and open foraging patches, allowing reliable assessment of spatio-temporal change in predation risk. We investigated the way such a change triggered individual prey decisions on where, when and how to perform routine activities. RESULTS: Rabbit presence and behavior were recorded both day and night in patches with similar foraging characteristics, but contrasted in terms of openness. Cats, individually recognizable, were more active at night and in closed patches, in line with their expected higher hunting success in those conditions. Accordingly, rabbits avoided using closed patches at night and increased their vigilance if they did. Both day and night, rabbits increased their use of closed patches as compared to open patches in windy conditions, thereby probably reducing the thermoregulatory costs expected under such harsh environmental conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data map the landscape of fear in this study system and indicate that prey habitat use and vigilance complement each other. Solely focusing on one or the other tactic may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the way predation risk triggers prey decisions. Finally, future studies should investigate inter-individual variability in the relative use of these different types of complementary behavioral responses to perceived risk, along with the determinants and outcomes of such tactics. BioMed Central 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6302475/ /pubmed/30572866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0215-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blanchard, Pierrick
Lauzeral, Christine
Chamaillé-Jammes, Simon
Brunet, Clément
Lec’hvien, Arnaud
Péron, Guillaume
Pontier, Dominique
Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
title Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
title_full Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
title_fullStr Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
title_full_unstemmed Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
title_short Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
title_sort coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0215-7
work_keys_str_mv AT blanchardpierrick copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses
AT lauzeralchristine copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses
AT chamaillejammessimon copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses
AT brunetclement copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses
AT lechvienarnaud copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses
AT peronguillaume copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses
AT pontierdominique copingwithchangeinpredationriskacrossspaceandtimethroughcomplementarybehavioralresponses