Cargando…

Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method

Not considering the usability in designing clinical information systems causes problems in human–computer interaction and patient dissatisfaction. Therefore, in this study, the usability of the bed information management system (BIMS) was examined by think-aloud method. This cross-sectional study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza, Khajouei, Reza, Eslami, Saeid, Jangi, Majid, Ghalibaf, Azadeh Kamel, Zangouei, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637234
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_320_18
_version_ 1783382033190354944
author Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza
Khajouei, Reza
Eslami, Saeid
Jangi, Majid
Ghalibaf, Azadeh Kamel
Zangouei, Sara
author_facet Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza
Khajouei, Reza
Eslami, Saeid
Jangi, Majid
Ghalibaf, Azadeh Kamel
Zangouei, Sara
author_sort Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza
collection PubMed
description Not considering the usability in designing clinical information systems causes problems in human–computer interaction and patient dissatisfaction. Therefore, in this study, the usability of the bed information management system (BIMS) was examined by think-aloud method. This cross-sectional study was conducted on the BIMS in 50 noneducational hospitals. Participants consisted of three groups including users, facilitators, and technical support. To carry out the study, a scenario consisting of four tasks was designed. Three researchers analyzed the recorded files to identify the usability problems and their severity. The mean time of the evaluation process was 20:33 ± 4:47 s. The total number of the problems identifies by users was 80 cases. Data entry and layout problems with 38 (48%) and 33 (41%) cases were the most frequently found problems, respectively. About 61% and 55% of the data entry and layout problems had a minor severity (Severity 2), respectively. Furthermore, 43 (54%) cases of the problems were resolved by the users and 32 (40%) cases by the facilitator assistance. This study showed that a large number of the problems were due to the system poor design. Furthermore, by increasing the users’ level of knowledge about the system, it is possible to enhance user-system interaction. It is recommended that before designing and implementing a system, the system should be evaluated for usability, and the users should be educated in clinical information systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6302686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63026862019-01-11 Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza Khajouei, Reza Eslami, Saeid Jangi, Majid Ghalibaf, Azadeh Kamel Zangouei, Sara J Adv Pharm Technol Res Original Article Not considering the usability in designing clinical information systems causes problems in human–computer interaction and patient dissatisfaction. Therefore, in this study, the usability of the bed information management system (BIMS) was examined by think-aloud method. This cross-sectional study was conducted on the BIMS in 50 noneducational hospitals. Participants consisted of three groups including users, facilitators, and technical support. To carry out the study, a scenario consisting of four tasks was designed. Three researchers analyzed the recorded files to identify the usability problems and their severity. The mean time of the evaluation process was 20:33 ± 4:47 s. The total number of the problems identifies by users was 80 cases. Data entry and layout problems with 38 (48%) and 33 (41%) cases were the most frequently found problems, respectively. About 61% and 55% of the data entry and layout problems had a minor severity (Severity 2), respectively. Furthermore, 43 (54%) cases of the problems were resolved by the users and 32 (40%) cases by the facilitator assistance. This study showed that a large number of the problems were due to the system poor design. Furthermore, by increasing the users’ level of knowledge about the system, it is possible to enhance user-system interaction. It is recommended that before designing and implementing a system, the system should be evaluated for usability, and the users should be educated in clinical information systems. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6302686/ /pubmed/30637234 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_320_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza
Khajouei, Reza
Eslami, Saeid
Jangi, Majid
Ghalibaf, Azadeh Kamel
Zangouei, Sara
Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method
title Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method
title_full Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method
title_fullStr Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method
title_full_unstemmed Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method
title_short Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method
title_sort usability testing of bed information management system: a think-aloud method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637234
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_320_18
work_keys_str_mv AT mazaherihabibimohammadreza usabilitytestingofbedinformationmanagementsystemathinkaloudmethod
AT khajoueireza usabilitytestingofbedinformationmanagementsystemathinkaloudmethod
AT eslamisaeid usabilitytestingofbedinformationmanagementsystemathinkaloudmethod
AT jangimajid usabilitytestingofbedinformationmanagementsystemathinkaloudmethod
AT ghalibafazadehkamel usabilitytestingofbedinformationmanagementsystemathinkaloudmethod
AT zangoueisara usabilitytestingofbedinformationmanagementsystemathinkaloudmethod