Cargando…

Mechanisms of recurrent haemoptysis after super-selective bronchial artery coil embolisation: a single-centre retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES: In recognition of the significant impairment caused by haemoptysis on a patient’s quality of life, bronchial artery embolisation has been introduced worldwide as one of the first-line treatment options. Since little evidence is available on the mechanisms of recurrent haemoptysis after s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryuge, Misaki, Hara, Masahiko, Hiroe, Takanori, Omachi, Naoki, Minomo, Shojiro, Kitaguchi, Kazushi, Youmoto, Mihoko, Asakura, Norihiro, Sakata, Yasushi, Ishikawa, Hideo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30054792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5637-2
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: In recognition of the significant impairment caused by haemoptysis on a patient’s quality of life, bronchial artery embolisation has been introduced worldwide as one of the first-line treatment options. Since little evidence is available on the mechanisms of recurrent haemoptysis after super-selective bronchial artery coil embolisation (ssBACE), the purpose of the present study is to evaluate these. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the mechanisms of recurrent haemoptysis using both enhanced computed tomography and cineangiography following ssBACE by reviewing 299 haemoptysis-related arteries (HRAs) in 57 consecutive patients who underwent 2nd series ssBACE for the management of recurrent haemoptysis between April 2010 and December 2015. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 69 (interquartile range 64–74) years, and 43.9% were men. This study revealed that (1) recanalisation was the most common mechanism (45.2%) followed by development of new HRA (38.5%), bridging collaterals (14.7%) and conventional collaterals (1.7%); (2) these trends could be modified in several situations such as with antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications; (3) relatively large-diameter HRAs were more likely to recanalise compared with small-diameter HRAs and (4) recurrent haemoptysis could be managed by 2nd series ssBACE with a procedural success rate of 97.7% without any major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Recanalisation was the most common mechanism of recurrent haemoptysis after ssBACE. Our results provide interventionists with indispensable insights. KEY POINTS: • Recanalisation was the most common mechanism of recurrent haemoptysis after super-selective bronchial artery coil embolisation, followed by development of new haemoptysis-related arteries • These trends could be modified in several situations such as with antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications • Recurrent haemoptysis could be managed by 2nd series super-selective bronchial artery coil embolisation with a procedural success rate of 97.7% without any major complications.