Cargando…

Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?

OBJECTIVES: To assess if the administration of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) significantly affects hepatic magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase (DHBP). METHODS: A total of 47 patients (15 females, 32 males; age range 23–78 years, mean 54.28 years)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plaikner, M., Kremser, C., Zoller, H., Steurer, M., Glodny, B., Jaschke, W., Henninger, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5616-7
_version_ 1783382071898537984
author Plaikner, M.
Kremser, C.
Zoller, H.
Steurer, M.
Glodny, B.
Jaschke, W.
Henninger, B.
author_facet Plaikner, M.
Kremser, C.
Zoller, H.
Steurer, M.
Glodny, B.
Jaschke, W.
Henninger, B.
author_sort Plaikner, M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess if the administration of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) significantly affects hepatic magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase (DHBP). METHODS: A total of 47 patients (15 females, 32 males; age range 23–78 years, mean 54.28 years) were assigned to standard hepatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with application of Gd-EOB-DTPA and hepatic MRE. MRE was performed before injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA and after 40–50 min in the DHBP. Liver stiffness values were obtained before and after contrast media application and differences between pre- and post-Gd-EOB-DTPA values were evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. In addition, the data were compared with regard to the resulting fibrosis classification. RESULTS: Mean hepatic stiffness for pre-Gd-EOB-DTPA measurements was 4.01 kPa and post-Gd-EOB-DTPA measurements yielded 3.95 kPa. We found a highly significant individual correlation between pre- and post-Gd-EOB-DTPA stiffness values (Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) with no significant difference between the two measurements (p =0.49)). Bland-Altman plot did not show a systematic effect for the difference between pre- and post-stiffness measurements (mean difference: 0.06 kPa, SD 0.81). Regarding the classification of fibrosis stages, the overall agreement was 87.23% and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 96.4%, indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA does not significantly influence MRE stiffness measurements of the liver in the DHBP. Therefore, MRE can be performed in the DHBP. KEY POINTS: • MRE of the liver can reliably be performed in the delayed hepatobiliary phase. • Gd-EOB-DTPA does not significantly influence MRE stiffness measurements of the liver. • MRE performed in the delayed hepatobiliary-phase is reasonable in patients with reduced liver function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6302879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63028792019-01-04 Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase? Plaikner, M. Kremser, C. Zoller, H. Steurer, M. Glodny, B. Jaschke, W. Henninger, B. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: To assess if the administration of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) significantly affects hepatic magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase (DHBP). METHODS: A total of 47 patients (15 females, 32 males; age range 23–78 years, mean 54.28 years) were assigned to standard hepatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with application of Gd-EOB-DTPA and hepatic MRE. MRE was performed before injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA and after 40–50 min in the DHBP. Liver stiffness values were obtained before and after contrast media application and differences between pre- and post-Gd-EOB-DTPA values were evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. In addition, the data were compared with regard to the resulting fibrosis classification. RESULTS: Mean hepatic stiffness for pre-Gd-EOB-DTPA measurements was 4.01 kPa and post-Gd-EOB-DTPA measurements yielded 3.95 kPa. We found a highly significant individual correlation between pre- and post-Gd-EOB-DTPA stiffness values (Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) with no significant difference between the two measurements (p =0.49)). Bland-Altman plot did not show a systematic effect for the difference between pre- and post-stiffness measurements (mean difference: 0.06 kPa, SD 0.81). Regarding the classification of fibrosis stages, the overall agreement was 87.23% and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 96.4%, indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA does not significantly influence MRE stiffness measurements of the liver in the DHBP. Therefore, MRE can be performed in the DHBP. KEY POINTS: • MRE of the liver can reliably be performed in the delayed hepatobiliary phase. • Gd-EOB-DTPA does not significantly influence MRE stiffness measurements of the liver. • MRE performed in the delayed hepatobiliary-phase is reasonable in patients with reduced liver function. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6302879/ /pubmed/30027410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5616-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Plaikner, M.
Kremser, C.
Zoller, H.
Steurer, M.
Glodny, B.
Jaschke, W.
Henninger, B.
Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
title Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
title_full Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
title_fullStr Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
title_full_unstemmed Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
title_short Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
title_sort does gadoxetate disodium affect mre measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5616-7
work_keys_str_mv AT plaiknerm doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase
AT kremserc doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase
AT zollerh doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase
AT steurerm doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase
AT glodnyb doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase
AT jaschkew doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase
AT henningerb doesgadoxetatedisodiumaffectmremeasurementsinthedelayedhepatobiliaryphase