Cargando…

Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges

We conducted two AB experiments (treatment vs. control) in a massive open online course. The first experiment evaluates deliberate practice activities (DPAs) for developing problem solving expertise as measured by traditional physics problems. We find that a more interactive drag-and-drop format of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhongzhou, Chudzicki, Christopher, Palumbo, Daniel, Alexandron, Giora, Choi, Youn-Jeng, Zhou, Qian, Pritchard, David E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0034-4
_version_ 1783382079640174592
author Chen, Zhongzhou
Chudzicki, Christopher
Palumbo, Daniel
Alexandron, Giora
Choi, Youn-Jeng
Zhou, Qian
Pritchard, David E.
author_facet Chen, Zhongzhou
Chudzicki, Christopher
Palumbo, Daniel
Alexandron, Giora
Choi, Youn-Jeng
Zhou, Qian
Pritchard, David E.
author_sort Chen, Zhongzhou
collection PubMed
description We conducted two AB experiments (treatment vs. control) in a massive open online course. The first experiment evaluates deliberate practice activities (DPAs) for developing problem solving expertise as measured by traditional physics problems. We find that a more interactive drag-and-drop format of DPA generates quicker learning than a multiple choice format but DPAs do not improve performance on solving traditional physics problems more than normal homework practice. The second experiment shows that a different video shooting setting can improve the fluency of the instructor which in turn improves the engagement of the students although it has no significant impact on the learning outcomes. These two cases demonstrate the potential of MOOC AB experiments as an open-ended research tool but also reveal limitations. We discuss the three most important challenges: wide student distribution, “open-book” nature of assessments, and large quantity and variety of data. We suggest possible methods to cope with those.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6302917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63029172019-01-04 Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges Chen, Zhongzhou Chudzicki, Christopher Palumbo, Daniel Alexandron, Giora Choi, Youn-Jeng Zhou, Qian Pritchard, David E. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn Research We conducted two AB experiments (treatment vs. control) in a massive open online course. The first experiment evaluates deliberate practice activities (DPAs) for developing problem solving expertise as measured by traditional physics problems. We find that a more interactive drag-and-drop format of DPA generates quicker learning than a multiple choice format but DPAs do not improve performance on solving traditional physics problems more than normal homework practice. The second experiment shows that a different video shooting setting can improve the fluency of the instructor which in turn improves the engagement of the students although it has no significant impact on the learning outcomes. These two cases demonstrate the potential of MOOC AB experiments as an open-ended research tool but also reveal limitations. We discuss the three most important challenges: wide student distribution, “open-book” nature of assessments, and large quantity and variety of data. We suggest possible methods to cope with those. Springer Singapore 2016-04-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC6302917/ /pubmed/30613242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0034-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Zhongzhou
Chudzicki, Christopher
Palumbo, Daniel
Alexandron, Giora
Choi, Youn-Jeng
Zhou, Qian
Pritchard, David E.
Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges
title Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges
title_full Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges
title_fullStr Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges
title_full_unstemmed Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges
title_short Researching for better instructional methods using AB experiments in MOOCs: results and challenges
title_sort researching for better instructional methods using ab experiments in moocs: results and challenges
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0034-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhongzhou researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges
AT chudzickichristopher researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges
AT palumbodaniel researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges
AT alexandrongiora researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges
AT choiyounjeng researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges
AT zhouqian researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges
AT pritcharddavide researchingforbetterinstructionalmethodsusingabexperimentsinmoocsresultsandchallenges