Cargando…

How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians

Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssens, Wim, Corhay, Jean-Louis, Bogaerts, Peter, Derom, Eric, Frusch, Nicolas, Dang, Delphine Nguyen, Kibanda, Jesabelle, Ruttens, David, Thyrion, Lisa, Troosters, Thierry, Marchand, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732
_version_ 1783382086369935360
author Janssens, Wim
Corhay, Jean-Louis
Bogaerts, Peter
Derom, Eric
Frusch, Nicolas
Dang, Delphine Nguyen
Kibanda, Jesabelle
Ruttens, David
Thyrion, Lisa
Troosters, Thierry
Marchand, Eric
author_facet Janssens, Wim
Corhay, Jean-Louis
Bogaerts, Peter
Derom, Eric
Frusch, Nicolas
Dang, Delphine Nguyen
Kibanda, Jesabelle
Ruttens, David
Thyrion, Lisa
Troosters, Thierry
Marchand, Eric
author_sort Janssens, Wim
collection PubMed
description Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to identify which barriers may exist according to respiratory physicians. A telephone and online survey was developed by a Belgian expert panel and distributed among all active Belgian chest physicians (n = 492). Data were obtained from 200 respondents (40%). Seventy-five percentage of the chest physicians had direct access to an ambulatory rehabilitation program in their hospital. Most of these programs are organized bi or triweekly for an average period of 3–6 months. Programs focus strongly on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from secondary care, have a multidisciplinary approach and provide exercise capacity and quality of life measures as main outcomes. Yet large differences were observed in process and outcome indicators between the programs of centres with standard funding and those of specialized centres with a larger allocated budget. We conclude that multidisciplinary PR programs are available in the majority of Belgian hospitals. Differences in funding determine the quality of the team, the diversity of the interventions and the monitoring of outcomes. More resources for rehabilitation will directly improve the utilization and quality of this essential treatment option in respiratory diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6302967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63029672019-01-24 How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians Janssens, Wim Corhay, Jean-Louis Bogaerts, Peter Derom, Eric Frusch, Nicolas Dang, Delphine Nguyen Kibanda, Jesabelle Ruttens, David Thyrion, Lisa Troosters, Thierry Marchand, Eric Chron Respir Dis Original Paper Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to identify which barriers may exist according to respiratory physicians. A telephone and online survey was developed by a Belgian expert panel and distributed among all active Belgian chest physicians (n = 492). Data were obtained from 200 respondents (40%). Seventy-five percentage of the chest physicians had direct access to an ambulatory rehabilitation program in their hospital. Most of these programs are organized bi or triweekly for an average period of 3–6 months. Programs focus strongly on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from secondary care, have a multidisciplinary approach and provide exercise capacity and quality of life measures as main outcomes. Yet large differences were observed in process and outcome indicators between the programs of centres with standard funding and those of specialized centres with a larger allocated budget. We conclude that multidisciplinary PR programs are available in the majority of Belgian hospitals. Differences in funding determine the quality of the team, the diversity of the interventions and the monitoring of outcomes. More resources for rehabilitation will directly improve the utilization and quality of this essential treatment option in respiratory diseases. SAGE Publications 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6302967/ /pubmed/29631422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Janssens, Wim
Corhay, Jean-Louis
Bogaerts, Peter
Derom, Eric
Frusch, Nicolas
Dang, Delphine Nguyen
Kibanda, Jesabelle
Ruttens, David
Thyrion, Lisa
Troosters, Thierry
Marchand, Eric
How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
title How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
title_full How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
title_fullStr How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
title_full_unstemmed How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
title_short How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
title_sort how resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: a survey among belgian chest physicians
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenswim howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT corhayjeanlouis howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT bogaertspeter howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT deromeric howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT fruschnicolas howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT dangdelphinenguyen howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT kibandajesabelle howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT ruttensdavid howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT thyrionlisa howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT troostersthierry howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians
AT marchanderic howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians