Cargando…
How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians
Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to id...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732 |
_version_ | 1783382086369935360 |
---|---|
author | Janssens, Wim Corhay, Jean-Louis Bogaerts, Peter Derom, Eric Frusch, Nicolas Dang, Delphine Nguyen Kibanda, Jesabelle Ruttens, David Thyrion, Lisa Troosters, Thierry Marchand, Eric |
author_facet | Janssens, Wim Corhay, Jean-Louis Bogaerts, Peter Derom, Eric Frusch, Nicolas Dang, Delphine Nguyen Kibanda, Jesabelle Ruttens, David Thyrion, Lisa Troosters, Thierry Marchand, Eric |
author_sort | Janssens, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to identify which barriers may exist according to respiratory physicians. A telephone and online survey was developed by a Belgian expert panel and distributed among all active Belgian chest physicians (n = 492). Data were obtained from 200 respondents (40%). Seventy-five percentage of the chest physicians had direct access to an ambulatory rehabilitation program in their hospital. Most of these programs are organized bi or triweekly for an average period of 3–6 months. Programs focus strongly on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from secondary care, have a multidisciplinary approach and provide exercise capacity and quality of life measures as main outcomes. Yet large differences were observed in process and outcome indicators between the programs of centres with standard funding and those of specialized centres with a larger allocated budget. We conclude that multidisciplinary PR programs are available in the majority of Belgian hospitals. Differences in funding determine the quality of the team, the diversity of the interventions and the monitoring of outcomes. More resources for rehabilitation will directly improve the utilization and quality of this essential treatment option in respiratory diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6302967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63029672019-01-24 How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians Janssens, Wim Corhay, Jean-Louis Bogaerts, Peter Derom, Eric Frusch, Nicolas Dang, Delphine Nguyen Kibanda, Jesabelle Ruttens, David Thyrion, Lisa Troosters, Thierry Marchand, Eric Chron Respir Dis Original Paper Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to identify which barriers may exist according to respiratory physicians. A telephone and online survey was developed by a Belgian expert panel and distributed among all active Belgian chest physicians (n = 492). Data were obtained from 200 respondents (40%). Seventy-five percentage of the chest physicians had direct access to an ambulatory rehabilitation program in their hospital. Most of these programs are organized bi or triweekly for an average period of 3–6 months. Programs focus strongly on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from secondary care, have a multidisciplinary approach and provide exercise capacity and quality of life measures as main outcomes. Yet large differences were observed in process and outcome indicators between the programs of centres with standard funding and those of specialized centres with a larger allocated budget. We conclude that multidisciplinary PR programs are available in the majority of Belgian hospitals. Differences in funding determine the quality of the team, the diversity of the interventions and the monitoring of outcomes. More resources for rehabilitation will directly improve the utilization and quality of this essential treatment option in respiratory diseases. SAGE Publications 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6302967/ /pubmed/29631422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Janssens, Wim Corhay, Jean-Louis Bogaerts, Peter Derom, Eric Frusch, Nicolas Dang, Delphine Nguyen Kibanda, Jesabelle Ruttens, David Thyrion, Lisa Troosters, Thierry Marchand, Eric How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians |
title | How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey
among Belgian chest physicians |
title_full | How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey
among Belgian chest physicians |
title_fullStr | How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey
among Belgian chest physicians |
title_full_unstemmed | How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey
among Belgian chest physicians |
title_short | How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey
among Belgian chest physicians |
title_sort | how resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: a survey
among belgian chest physicians |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssenswim howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT corhayjeanlouis howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT bogaertspeter howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT deromeric howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT fruschnicolas howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT dangdelphinenguyen howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT kibandajesabelle howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT ruttensdavid howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT thyrionlisa howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT troostersthierry howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians AT marchanderic howresourcesdeterminepulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsasurveyamongbelgianchestphysicians |