Cargando…

Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities

The creation of genome-wide libraries for CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), interference (CRISPRi), and activation (CRISPRa) has enabled the systematic interrogation of gene function. Here, we show that our recently-described CRISPRko library (Brunello) is more effective than previously published librarie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanson, Kendall R., Hanna, Ruth E., Hegde, Mudra, Donovan, Katherine F., Strand, Christine, Sullender, Meagan E., Vaimberg, Emma W., Goodale, Amy, Root, David E., Piccioni, Federica, Doench, John G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07901-8
_version_ 1783382154330243072
author Sanson, Kendall R.
Hanna, Ruth E.
Hegde, Mudra
Donovan, Katherine F.
Strand, Christine
Sullender, Meagan E.
Vaimberg, Emma W.
Goodale, Amy
Root, David E.
Piccioni, Federica
Doench, John G.
author_facet Sanson, Kendall R.
Hanna, Ruth E.
Hegde, Mudra
Donovan, Katherine F.
Strand, Christine
Sullender, Meagan E.
Vaimberg, Emma W.
Goodale, Amy
Root, David E.
Piccioni, Federica
Doench, John G.
author_sort Sanson, Kendall R.
collection PubMed
description The creation of genome-wide libraries for CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), interference (CRISPRi), and activation (CRISPRa) has enabled the systematic interrogation of gene function. Here, we show that our recently-described CRISPRko library (Brunello) is more effective than previously published libraries at distinguishing essential and non-essential genes, providing approximately the same perturbation-level performance improvement over GeCKO libraries as GeCKO provided over RNAi. Additionally, we present genome-wide libraries for CRISPRi (Dolcetto) and CRISPRa (Calabrese), and show in negative selection screens that Dolcetto, with fewer sgRNAs per gene, outperforms existing CRISPRi libraries and achieves comparable performance to CRISPRko in detecting essential genes. We also perform positive selection CRISPRa screens and demonstrate that Calabrese outperforms the SAM approach at identifying vemurafenib resistance genes. We further compare CRISPRa to genome-scale libraries of open reading frames (ORFs). Together, these libraries represent a suite of genome-wide tools to efficiently interrogate gene function with multiple modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63033222018-12-23 Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities Sanson, Kendall R. Hanna, Ruth E. Hegde, Mudra Donovan, Katherine F. Strand, Christine Sullender, Meagan E. Vaimberg, Emma W. Goodale, Amy Root, David E. Piccioni, Federica Doench, John G. Nat Commun Article The creation of genome-wide libraries for CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), interference (CRISPRi), and activation (CRISPRa) has enabled the systematic interrogation of gene function. Here, we show that our recently-described CRISPRko library (Brunello) is more effective than previously published libraries at distinguishing essential and non-essential genes, providing approximately the same perturbation-level performance improvement over GeCKO libraries as GeCKO provided over RNAi. Additionally, we present genome-wide libraries for CRISPRi (Dolcetto) and CRISPRa (Calabrese), and show in negative selection screens that Dolcetto, with fewer sgRNAs per gene, outperforms existing CRISPRi libraries and achieves comparable performance to CRISPRko in detecting essential genes. We also perform positive selection CRISPRa screens and demonstrate that Calabrese outperforms the SAM approach at identifying vemurafenib resistance genes. We further compare CRISPRa to genome-scale libraries of open reading frames (ORFs). Together, these libraries represent a suite of genome-wide tools to efficiently interrogate gene function with multiple modalities. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6303322/ /pubmed/30575746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07901-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sanson, Kendall R.
Hanna, Ruth E.
Hegde, Mudra
Donovan, Katherine F.
Strand, Christine
Sullender, Meagan E.
Vaimberg, Emma W.
Goodale, Amy
Root, David E.
Piccioni, Federica
Doench, John G.
Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
title Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
title_full Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
title_fullStr Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
title_full_unstemmed Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
title_short Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
title_sort optimized libraries for crispr-cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07901-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sansonkendallr optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT hannaruthe optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT hegdemudra optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT donovankatherinef optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT strandchristine optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT sullendermeagane optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT vaimbergemmaw optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT goodaleamy optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT rootdavide optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT piccionifederica optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities
AT doenchjohng optimizedlibrariesforcrisprcas9geneticscreenswithmultiplemodalities