Cargando…

Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Motor imagery (MI) is a very popular and well-accepted technique in different disciplines. Originating from sport and psychology, MI is now also used in the field of medicine and education. Several studies confirmed the benefits of MI to facilitate motor learning and skill acquisition....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suica, Zorica, Platteau-Waldmeier, Petra, Koppel, Szabina, Schmidt-Trucksaess, Arno, Ettlin, Thierry, Schuster-Amft, Corina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439
_version_ 1783382189493190656
author Suica, Zorica
Platteau-Waldmeier, Petra
Koppel, Szabina
Schmidt-Trucksaess, Arno
Ettlin, Thierry
Schuster-Amft, Corina
author_facet Suica, Zorica
Platteau-Waldmeier, Petra
Koppel, Szabina
Schmidt-Trucksaess, Arno
Ettlin, Thierry
Schuster-Amft, Corina
author_sort Suica, Zorica
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Motor imagery (MI) is a very popular and well-accepted technique in different disciplines. Originating from sport and psychology, MI is now also used in the field of medicine and education. Several studies confirmed the benefits of MI to facilitate motor learning and skill acquisition. The findings indicated that individual’s MI ability might influence the effectiveness of MI interventions. Over the last two centuries, researchers have developed several assessments to evaluate MI’s abstract construct. However, no systematic reviews (SR) exist for MI ability evaluation methods and their measurement properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The SR will evaluate available MI ability assessments and their psychometric properties in four relevant disciplines: sports, psychology, medicine and education. This involves performing searches in SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Working independently, two reviewers will screen articles for selection. Then all raw information will be compiled in an overview table—including the articles’ characteristics (eg, a study’s setting or the population demographics) and the MI ability assessment (psychometric properties). To evaluate the articles’ methodological quality, we will use the COSMIN checklist. Then we will evaluate all the included assessments’ quality and perform a best-evidence synthesis. Results of this review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The SR is based on published data, and ethical approval is not required. This review will provide information on assessment performance and equipment, as well as its main focus and usefulness. Furthermore, we will present the methodological quality of all the included articles and assess the included instruments’ quality. Ultimately, this will act as a valuable resource, providing an overview of MI ability assessments for individual clinical settings, treatment aims, and various populations. The SR’s final report will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017077004
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63035572019-01-04 Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review Suica, Zorica Platteau-Waldmeier, Petra Koppel, Szabina Schmidt-Trucksaess, Arno Ettlin, Thierry Schuster-Amft, Corina BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Motor imagery (MI) is a very popular and well-accepted technique in different disciplines. Originating from sport and psychology, MI is now also used in the field of medicine and education. Several studies confirmed the benefits of MI to facilitate motor learning and skill acquisition. The findings indicated that individual’s MI ability might influence the effectiveness of MI interventions. Over the last two centuries, researchers have developed several assessments to evaluate MI’s abstract construct. However, no systematic reviews (SR) exist for MI ability evaluation methods and their measurement properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The SR will evaluate available MI ability assessments and their psychometric properties in four relevant disciplines: sports, psychology, medicine and education. This involves performing searches in SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Working independently, two reviewers will screen articles for selection. Then all raw information will be compiled in an overview table—including the articles’ characteristics (eg, a study’s setting or the population demographics) and the MI ability assessment (psychometric properties). To evaluate the articles’ methodological quality, we will use the COSMIN checklist. Then we will evaluate all the included assessments’ quality and perform a best-evidence synthesis. Results of this review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The SR is based on published data, and ethical approval is not required. This review will provide information on assessment performance and equipment, as well as its main focus and usefulness. Furthermore, we will present the methodological quality of all the included articles and assess the included instruments’ quality. Ultimately, this will act as a valuable resource, providing an overview of MI ability assessments for individual clinical settings, treatment aims, and various populations. The SR’s final report will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017077004 BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6303557/ /pubmed/30552265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Suica, Zorica
Platteau-Waldmeier, Petra
Koppel, Szabina
Schmidt-Trucksaess, Arno
Ettlin, Thierry
Schuster-Amft, Corina
Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
title Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439
work_keys_str_mv AT suicazorica motorimageryabilityassessmentsinfourdisciplinesprotocolforasystematicreview
AT platteauwaldmeierpetra motorimageryabilityassessmentsinfourdisciplinesprotocolforasystematicreview
AT koppelszabina motorimageryabilityassessmentsinfourdisciplinesprotocolforasystematicreview
AT schmidttrucksaessarno motorimageryabilityassessmentsinfourdisciplinesprotocolforasystematicreview
AT ettlinthierry motorimageryabilityassessmentsinfourdisciplinesprotocolforasystematicreview
AT schusteramftcorina motorimageryabilityassessmentsinfourdisciplinesprotocolforasystematicreview