Cargando…

Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES: Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a significant cause of morbidity. Vasodilator medications cause unwanted adverse effects, with behavioural and lifestyle changes forming the mainstay of self-management; this is difficult to implement successfully. The objectives of this study were to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniels, Jo, Pauling, John D, Eccleston, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024528
_version_ 1783382190183153664
author Daniels, Jo
Pauling, John D
Eccleston, Christopher
author_facet Daniels, Jo
Pauling, John D
Eccleston, Christopher
author_sort Daniels, Jo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a significant cause of morbidity. Vasodilator medications cause unwanted adverse effects, with behavioural and lifestyle changes forming the mainstay of self-management; this is difficult to implement successfully. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of behaviour change interventions for RP and identify learning points for future treatment development. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of findings. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and PsycINFO were searched for eligible studies on 22 August 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of behaviour change interventions with at least one control comparator arm. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers, reaching consensus with a third when necessary. Primary outcomes of interest included severity/impact, frequency and duration of RP episodes, pain, disability, adverse events and study withdrawal. RESULTS: Of 638 articles retrieved, eight studies fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Biofeedback was the active behaviour change treatment arm for seven studies, with one study reporting a behavioural intervention. Studies were published 1978–2002; six were USA-based studies, one German and one Swedish. Using Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment, studies were assessed to be overall at high risk of bias, with the exception of one large RCT. The total sample included 495 participants (study median=29), with a median age of 39.5 years and preponderance towards females (73%). Five studies reported significant effects in primary outcomes of interest; however, due to missing data, relative efficacy of interventions could not be reliably assessed. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support or refute claims of the efficacy of behaviour change interventions for the management of RP. There remains a strong case for developing and testing behaviour change interventions that focus on self-management; however, theoretical development and advancement in trial quality is imperative to underpin future work. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017049643.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63035612019-01-04 Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review Daniels, Jo Pauling, John D Eccleston, Christopher BMJ Open Rheumatology OBJECTIVES: Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a significant cause of morbidity. Vasodilator medications cause unwanted adverse effects, with behavioural and lifestyle changes forming the mainstay of self-management; this is difficult to implement successfully. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of behaviour change interventions for RP and identify learning points for future treatment development. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of findings. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and PsycINFO were searched for eligible studies on 22 August 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of behaviour change interventions with at least one control comparator arm. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers, reaching consensus with a third when necessary. Primary outcomes of interest included severity/impact, frequency and duration of RP episodes, pain, disability, adverse events and study withdrawal. RESULTS: Of 638 articles retrieved, eight studies fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Biofeedback was the active behaviour change treatment arm for seven studies, with one study reporting a behavioural intervention. Studies were published 1978–2002; six were USA-based studies, one German and one Swedish. Using Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment, studies were assessed to be overall at high risk of bias, with the exception of one large RCT. The total sample included 495 participants (study median=29), with a median age of 39.5 years and preponderance towards females (73%). Five studies reported significant effects in primary outcomes of interest; however, due to missing data, relative efficacy of interventions could not be reliably assessed. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support or refute claims of the efficacy of behaviour change interventions for the management of RP. There remains a strong case for developing and testing behaviour change interventions that focus on self-management; however, theoretical development and advancement in trial quality is imperative to underpin future work. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017049643. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6303561/ /pubmed/30552281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024528 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rheumatology
Daniels, Jo
Pauling, John D
Eccleston, Christopher
Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
title Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
title_full Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
title_short Behaviour change interventions for the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
title_sort behaviour change interventions for the management of raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic literature review
topic Rheumatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024528
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsjo behaviourchangeinterventionsforthemanagementofraynaudsphenomenonasystematicliteraturereview
AT paulingjohnd behaviourchangeinterventionsforthemanagementofraynaudsphenomenonasystematicliteraturereview
AT ecclestonchristopher behaviourchangeinterventionsforthemanagementofraynaudsphenomenonasystematicliteraturereview