Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022879 |
_version_ | 1783382193582637056 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Ziying Ding, Xiang Lei, Guanghua Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Jiatian Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Cui, Yang Xiong, Yilin Wang, Yilun Xie, Dongxing |
author_facet | Wu, Ziying Ding, Xiang Lei, Guanghua Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Jiatian Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Cui, Yang Xiong, Yilin Wang, Yilun Xie, Dongxing |
author_sort | Wu, Ziying |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy of PEMF therapy with sham control in patients with OA. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pain, function, adverse effects and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan V.5.2 was used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included, among which ten trials involved knee OA, two involved cervical OA and one involved hand OA. The PEMF group showed more significant pain alleviation than the sham group in knee OA (standardised mean differences (SMD)=−0.54, 95% CI −1.04 to –0.04, p=0.03) and hand OA (SMD=−2.85, 95% CI −3.65 to –2.04, p<0.00001), but not in cervical OA. Similarly, comparing with the sham–control treatment, significant function improvement was observed in the PEMF group in both knee and hand OA patients (SMD=−0.34, 95% CI −0.53 to –0.14, p=0.0006, and SMD=−1.49, 95% CI −2.12 to –0.86, p<0.00001, respectively), but not in patients with cervical OA. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the exposure duration <=30 min per session exhibited better effects compared with the exposure duration >30 min per session. Three trials reported adverse events, and the combined results showed that there was no significant difference between PEMF and the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF could alleviate pain and improve physical function for patients with knee and hand OA, but not for patients with cervical OA. Meanwhile, a short PEMF treatment duration (within 30 min) may achieve more favourable efficacy. However, given the limited number of study available in hand and cervical OA, the implication of this conclusion should be cautious for hand and cervical OA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6303578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63035782019-01-04 Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis Wu, Ziying Ding, Xiang Lei, Guanghua Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Jiatian Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Cui, Yang Xiong, Yilin Wang, Yilun Xie, Dongxing BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy of PEMF therapy with sham control in patients with OA. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pain, function, adverse effects and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan V.5.2 was used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included, among which ten trials involved knee OA, two involved cervical OA and one involved hand OA. The PEMF group showed more significant pain alleviation than the sham group in knee OA (standardised mean differences (SMD)=−0.54, 95% CI −1.04 to –0.04, p=0.03) and hand OA (SMD=−2.85, 95% CI −3.65 to –2.04, p<0.00001), but not in cervical OA. Similarly, comparing with the sham–control treatment, significant function improvement was observed in the PEMF group in both knee and hand OA patients (SMD=−0.34, 95% CI −0.53 to –0.14, p=0.0006, and SMD=−1.49, 95% CI −2.12 to –0.86, p<0.00001, respectively), but not in patients with cervical OA. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the exposure duration <=30 min per session exhibited better effects compared with the exposure duration >30 min per session. Three trials reported adverse events, and the combined results showed that there was no significant difference between PEMF and the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF could alleviate pain and improve physical function for patients with knee and hand OA, but not for patients with cervical OA. Meanwhile, a short PEMF treatment duration (within 30 min) may achieve more favourable efficacy. However, given the limited number of study available in hand and cervical OA, the implication of this conclusion should be cautious for hand and cervical OA. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6303578/ /pubmed/30552258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022879 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Wu, Ziying Ding, Xiang Lei, Guanghua Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Jiatian Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Cui, Yang Xiong, Yilin Wang, Yilun Xie, Dongxing Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuziying efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT dingxiang efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT leiguanghua efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT zengchao efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT weijie efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT lijiatian efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT lihui efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT yangtuo efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT cuiyang efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT xiongyilin efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT wangyilun efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis AT xiedongxing efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis |