Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Ziying, Ding, Xiang, Lei, Guanghua, Zeng, Chao, Wei, Jie, Li, Jiatian, Li, Hui, Yang, Tuo, Cui, Yang, Xiong, Yilin, Wang, Yilun, Xie, Dongxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022879
_version_ 1783382193582637056
author Wu, Ziying
Ding, Xiang
Lei, Guanghua
Zeng, Chao
Wei, Jie
Li, Jiatian
Li, Hui
Yang, Tuo
Cui, Yang
Xiong, Yilin
Wang, Yilun
Xie, Dongxing
author_facet Wu, Ziying
Ding, Xiang
Lei, Guanghua
Zeng, Chao
Wei, Jie
Li, Jiatian
Li, Hui
Yang, Tuo
Cui, Yang
Xiong, Yilin
Wang, Yilun
Xie, Dongxing
author_sort Wu, Ziying
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy of PEMF therapy with sham control in patients with OA. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pain, function, adverse effects and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan V.5.2 was used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included, among which ten trials involved knee OA, two involved cervical OA and one involved hand OA. The PEMF group showed more significant pain alleviation than the sham group in knee OA (standardised mean differences (SMD)=−0.54, 95% CI −1.04 to –0.04, p=0.03) and hand OA (SMD=−2.85, 95% CI −3.65 to –2.04, p<0.00001), but not in cervical OA. Similarly, comparing with the sham–control treatment, significant function improvement was observed in the PEMF group in both knee and hand OA patients (SMD=−0.34, 95% CI −0.53 to –0.14, p=0.0006, and SMD=−1.49, 95% CI −2.12 to –0.86, p<0.00001, respectively), but not in patients with cervical OA. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the exposure duration <=30 min per session exhibited better effects compared with the exposure duration >30 min per session. Three trials reported adverse events, and the combined results showed that there was no significant difference between PEMF and the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF could alleviate pain and improve physical function for patients with knee and hand OA, but not for patients with cervical OA. Meanwhile, a short PEMF treatment duration (within 30 min) may achieve more favourable efficacy. However, given the limited number of study available in hand and cervical OA, the implication of this conclusion should be cautious for hand and cervical OA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63035782019-01-04 Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis Wu, Ziying Ding, Xiang Lei, Guanghua Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Jiatian Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Cui, Yang Xiong, Yilin Wang, Yilun Xie, Dongxing BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy of PEMF therapy with sham control in patients with OA. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pain, function, adverse effects and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan V.5.2 was used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included, among which ten trials involved knee OA, two involved cervical OA and one involved hand OA. The PEMF group showed more significant pain alleviation than the sham group in knee OA (standardised mean differences (SMD)=−0.54, 95% CI −1.04 to –0.04, p=0.03) and hand OA (SMD=−2.85, 95% CI −3.65 to –2.04, p<0.00001), but not in cervical OA. Similarly, comparing with the sham–control treatment, significant function improvement was observed in the PEMF group in both knee and hand OA patients (SMD=−0.34, 95% CI −0.53 to –0.14, p=0.0006, and SMD=−1.49, 95% CI −2.12 to –0.86, p<0.00001, respectively), but not in patients with cervical OA. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the exposure duration <=30 min per session exhibited better effects compared with the exposure duration >30 min per session. Three trials reported adverse events, and the combined results showed that there was no significant difference between PEMF and the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF could alleviate pain and improve physical function for patients with knee and hand OA, but not for patients with cervical OA. Meanwhile, a short PEMF treatment duration (within 30 min) may achieve more favourable efficacy. However, given the limited number of study available in hand and cervical OA, the implication of this conclusion should be cautious for hand and cervical OA. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6303578/ /pubmed/30552258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022879 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Wu, Ziying
Ding, Xiang
Lei, Guanghua
Zeng, Chao
Wei, Jie
Li, Jiatian
Li, Hui
Yang, Tuo
Cui, Yang
Xiong, Yilin
Wang, Yilun
Xie, Dongxing
Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022879
work_keys_str_mv AT wuziying efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT dingxiang efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT leiguanghua efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT zengchao efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT weijie efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT lijiatian efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT lihui efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT yangtuo efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT cuiyang efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT xiongyilin efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT wangyilun efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis
AT xiedongxing efficacyandsafetyofthepulsedelectromagneticfieldinosteoarthritisametaanalysis