Cargando…

Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature

INTRODUCTION: Unlike other forms of evaluation, social return on investment (SROI) methodology offers a way of placing values on personal, social and community outcomes, not just economic outcomes. Developed in 2000, there have been calls for greater academic involvement in development of SROI, whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hutchinson, Claire Louise, Berndt, Angela, Gilbert-Hunt, Susan, George, Stacey, Ratcliffe, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30530579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022534
_version_ 1783382199697932288
author Hutchinson, Claire Louise
Berndt, Angela
Gilbert-Hunt, Susan
George, Stacey
Ratcliffe, Julie
author_facet Hutchinson, Claire Louise
Berndt, Angela
Gilbert-Hunt, Susan
George, Stacey
Ratcliffe, Julie
author_sort Hutchinson, Claire Louise
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Unlike other forms of evaluation, social return on investment (SROI) methodology offers a way of placing values on personal, social and community outcomes, not just economic outcomes. Developed in 2000, there have been calls for greater academic involvement in development of SROI, which to date has been more typically implemented in-house or by consultants. This protocol describes a systematic review of SROI analysis conducted on health and social care programmes which represent a significant sector of social enterprise internationally. The aims of the systematic review are to (1) identify the extent to which academics have adopted SROI methodology, (2) how academics have interpreted, used and developed SROI methodology and (3) to assess the quality of studies published under peer review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review will include peer-reviewed studies since 2000 published in English. Search terms will be ‘social return on investment’ or ‘SROI’. Health and social care interventions will be identified in the initial screening given the proliferation of possible key words in these areas. Databases to be searched include Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Social Care Online and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Two reviewers will independently conduct initial screening based on titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria. Data extracted will include date of intervention, country, study design, aim of intervention/programme, participants and setting, health and social care measures used, and SROI ratio. The quality of studies will be assessed by two reviewers using a SROI quality framework designed for the purpose of this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review will review existing published academic literature; as such, ethics approval is not required for this study. A paper of the systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018080195.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63036122019-01-04 Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature Hutchinson, Claire Louise Berndt, Angela Gilbert-Hunt, Susan George, Stacey Ratcliffe, Julie BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Unlike other forms of evaluation, social return on investment (SROI) methodology offers a way of placing values on personal, social and community outcomes, not just economic outcomes. Developed in 2000, there have been calls for greater academic involvement in development of SROI, which to date has been more typically implemented in-house or by consultants. This protocol describes a systematic review of SROI analysis conducted on health and social care programmes which represent a significant sector of social enterprise internationally. The aims of the systematic review are to (1) identify the extent to which academics have adopted SROI methodology, (2) how academics have interpreted, used and developed SROI methodology and (3) to assess the quality of studies published under peer review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review will include peer-reviewed studies since 2000 published in English. Search terms will be ‘social return on investment’ or ‘SROI’. Health and social care interventions will be identified in the initial screening given the proliferation of possible key words in these areas. Databases to be searched include Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Social Care Online and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Two reviewers will independently conduct initial screening based on titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria. Data extracted will include date of intervention, country, study design, aim of intervention/programme, participants and setting, health and social care measures used, and SROI ratio. The quality of studies will be assessed by two reviewers using a SROI quality framework designed for the purpose of this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review will review existing published academic literature; as such, ethics approval is not required for this study. A paper of the systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018080195. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6303612/ /pubmed/30530579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022534 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Hutchinson, Claire Louise
Berndt, Angela
Gilbert-Hunt, Susan
George, Stacey
Ratcliffe, Julie
Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
title Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
title_full Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
title_fullStr Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
title_full_unstemmed Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
title_short Valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
title_sort valuing the impact of health and social care programmes using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? a protocol for a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30530579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022534
work_keys_str_mv AT hutchinsonclairelouise valuingtheimpactofhealthandsocialcareprogrammesusingsocialreturnoninvestmentanalysishowhaveacademicsadvancedthemethodologyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedliterature
AT berndtangela valuingtheimpactofhealthandsocialcareprogrammesusingsocialreturnoninvestmentanalysishowhaveacademicsadvancedthemethodologyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedliterature
AT gilberthuntsusan valuingtheimpactofhealthandsocialcareprogrammesusingsocialreturnoninvestmentanalysishowhaveacademicsadvancedthemethodologyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedliterature
AT georgestacey valuingtheimpactofhealthandsocialcareprogrammesusingsocialreturnoninvestmentanalysishowhaveacademicsadvancedthemethodologyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedliterature
AT ratcliffejulie valuingtheimpactofhealthandsocialcareprogrammesusingsocialreturnoninvestmentanalysishowhaveacademicsadvancedthemethodologyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedliterature