Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back and leg pain in the elderly and affects both physical activity and quality of life. First-line treatments are non-surgical options but if unsuccessful, surgery is advocated. The literature is not clear as to the outcome of surgery co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brøgger, Helle Algren, Maribo, Thomas, Christensen, Robin, Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024949
_version_ 1783382200849268736
author Brøgger, Helle Algren
Maribo, Thomas
Christensen, Robin
Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
author_facet Brøgger, Helle Algren
Maribo, Thomas
Christensen, Robin
Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
author_sort Brøgger, Helle Algren
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back and leg pain in the elderly and affects both physical activity and quality of life. First-line treatments are non-surgical options but if unsuccessful, surgery is advocated. The literature is not clear as to the outcome of surgery compared with non-surgical treatment, and the optimal time for surgery is not explicit. This observational study is designed to investigate the course of treatment, compare effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical management in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and identify prognostic factors for outcome in the context of current clinical practice. MATERIALS AND ANALYSIS: Prospectively registered data on treatment, outcome and patient characteristics are collected from nationwide registers on health and social issues, a clinical registry of people with chronic back pain and hospital medical records. Primary outcome is change in physical function measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are changes in symptom severity, pain-related function, health-related quality of life and general self-efficacy. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months. Outcomes at 12 months will be compared for patients who undergo surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and patients managed non-surgically, using different analytical approaches. Prespecified prognostic factors of interest at baseline include treatment allocation, back and leg pain intensity, comorbidity, duration of symptoms, pretreatment function, self-rated health, income, general self-efficacy and MRI-graded severity of central stenosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been evaluated by the Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark (S-20172000–200) and notified to the Danish Data Protection Agency (18/22336). All participants provide consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national and international conferences according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Prognosis Research Strategy statements. Potential sources of bias will be addressed using Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03548441; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63036182019-01-04 Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study Brøgger, Helle Algren Maribo, Thomas Christensen, Robin Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back and leg pain in the elderly and affects both physical activity and quality of life. First-line treatments are non-surgical options but if unsuccessful, surgery is advocated. The literature is not clear as to the outcome of surgery compared with non-surgical treatment, and the optimal time for surgery is not explicit. This observational study is designed to investigate the course of treatment, compare effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical management in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and identify prognostic factors for outcome in the context of current clinical practice. MATERIALS AND ANALYSIS: Prospectively registered data on treatment, outcome and patient characteristics are collected from nationwide registers on health and social issues, a clinical registry of people with chronic back pain and hospital medical records. Primary outcome is change in physical function measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are changes in symptom severity, pain-related function, health-related quality of life and general self-efficacy. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months. Outcomes at 12 months will be compared for patients who undergo surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and patients managed non-surgically, using different analytical approaches. Prespecified prognostic factors of interest at baseline include treatment allocation, back and leg pain intensity, comorbidity, duration of symptoms, pretreatment function, self-rated health, income, general self-efficacy and MRI-graded severity of central stenosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been evaluated by the Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark (S-20172000–200) and notified to the Danish Data Protection Agency (18/22336). All participants provide consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national and international conferences according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Prognosis Research Strategy statements. Potential sources of bias will be addressed using Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03548441; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6303618/ /pubmed/30573489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024949 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Brøgger, Helle Algren
Maribo, Thomas
Christensen, Robin
Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
title Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
title_full Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
title_short Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
title_sort comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024949
work_keys_str_mv AT brøggerhellealgren comparativeeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsforoutcomeofsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementoflumbarspinalstenosisinanelderlypopulationprotocolforanobservationalstudy
AT maribothomas comparativeeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsforoutcomeofsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementoflumbarspinalstenosisinanelderlypopulationprotocolforanobservationalstudy
AT christensenrobin comparativeeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsforoutcomeofsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementoflumbarspinalstenosisinanelderlypopulationprotocolforanobservationalstudy
AT schiøttzchristensenberit comparativeeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsforoutcomeofsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementoflumbarspinalstenosisinanelderlypopulationprotocolforanobservationalstudy