Cargando…

Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial

INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow ear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kearney, Rebecca Samantha, McKeown, Rebecca, Stevens, Siobhan, Parsons, Nicholas, Parsons, Helen, Wells, Philip, Brown, Jaclyn, Underwood, Martin, Redmond, Anthony, Mason, James, Costa, Matthew L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027242
_version_ 1783382213936545792
author Kearney, Rebecca Samantha
McKeown, Rebecca
Stevens, Siobhan
Parsons, Nicholas
Parsons, Helen
Wells, Philip
Brown, Jaclyn
Underwood, Martin
Redmond, Anthony
Mason, James
Costa, Matthew L
author_facet Kearney, Rebecca Samantha
McKeown, Rebecca
Stevens, Siobhan
Parsons, Nicholas
Parsons, Helen
Wells, Philip
Brown, Jaclyn
Underwood, Martin
Redmond, Anthony
Mason, James
Costa, Matthew L
author_sort Kearney, Rebecca Samantha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow early movement. This paper details the protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of plaster cast immobilisation versus functional bracing for patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit adults with a fractured ankle, for which the treating clinician would consider plaster cast to be a reasonable management option. Randomisation will be on a 1:1 basis, stratified by centre, operative or non-operative management and age. Participants will be allocated to either plaster cast or a functional brace, both treatments are widely used. To have 90% power to detect a difference of 10 points on the primary outcome (Olerud and Molander Ankle Score) at the primary outcome time point (16 weeks), we need to randomise a minimum of 478 people. Quality of life and resource use will be collected at 6, 10, 16, 24 weeks and 12, 18, 24 months. The differences between treatment groups will be assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The economic evaluation will adhere to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reference case. ETHICS, REGISTRATION AND DISSEMINATION: National Research Ethic Committee approved this study on 4 July 2017 (17/WM/0239). The first site opened to recruitment 9 October 2017. The results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15537280; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63036862019-01-04 Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial Kearney, Rebecca Samantha McKeown, Rebecca Stevens, Siobhan Parsons, Nicholas Parsons, Helen Wells, Philip Brown, Jaclyn Underwood, Martin Redmond, Anthony Mason, James Costa, Matthew L BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow early movement. This paper details the protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of plaster cast immobilisation versus functional bracing for patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit adults with a fractured ankle, for which the treating clinician would consider plaster cast to be a reasonable management option. Randomisation will be on a 1:1 basis, stratified by centre, operative or non-operative management and age. Participants will be allocated to either plaster cast or a functional brace, both treatments are widely used. To have 90% power to detect a difference of 10 points on the primary outcome (Olerud and Molander Ankle Score) at the primary outcome time point (16 weeks), we need to randomise a minimum of 478 people. Quality of life and resource use will be collected at 6, 10, 16, 24 weeks and 12, 18, 24 months. The differences between treatment groups will be assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The economic evaluation will adhere to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reference case. ETHICS, REGISTRATION AND DISSEMINATION: National Research Ethic Committee approved this study on 4 July 2017 (17/WM/0239). The first site opened to recruitment 9 October 2017. The results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15537280; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6303686/ /pubmed/30567826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027242 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Kearney, Rebecca Samantha
McKeown, Rebecca
Stevens, Siobhan
Parsons, Nicholas
Parsons, Helen
Wells, Philip
Brown, Jaclyn
Underwood, Martin
Redmond, Anthony
Mason, James
Costa, Matthew L
Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
title Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
title_full Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
title_fullStr Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
title_short Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
title_sort cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the uk study of ankle injury rehabilitation (air) multicentre randomised trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027242
work_keys_str_mv AT kearneyrebeccasamantha castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT mckeownrebecca castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT stevenssiobhan castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT parsonsnicholas castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT parsonshelen castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT wellsphilip castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT brownjaclyn castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT underwoodmartin castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT redmondanthony castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT masonjames castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT costamatthewl castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial