Cargando…
Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial
INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow ear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027242 |
_version_ | 1783382213936545792 |
---|---|
author | Kearney, Rebecca Samantha McKeown, Rebecca Stevens, Siobhan Parsons, Nicholas Parsons, Helen Wells, Philip Brown, Jaclyn Underwood, Martin Redmond, Anthony Mason, James Costa, Matthew L |
author_facet | Kearney, Rebecca Samantha McKeown, Rebecca Stevens, Siobhan Parsons, Nicholas Parsons, Helen Wells, Philip Brown, Jaclyn Underwood, Martin Redmond, Anthony Mason, James Costa, Matthew L |
author_sort | Kearney, Rebecca Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow early movement. This paper details the protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of plaster cast immobilisation versus functional bracing for patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit adults with a fractured ankle, for which the treating clinician would consider plaster cast to be a reasonable management option. Randomisation will be on a 1:1 basis, stratified by centre, operative or non-operative management and age. Participants will be allocated to either plaster cast or a functional brace, both treatments are widely used. To have 90% power to detect a difference of 10 points on the primary outcome (Olerud and Molander Ankle Score) at the primary outcome time point (16 weeks), we need to randomise a minimum of 478 people. Quality of life and resource use will be collected at 6, 10, 16, 24 weeks and 12, 18, 24 months. The differences between treatment groups will be assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The economic evaluation will adhere to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reference case. ETHICS, REGISTRATION AND DISSEMINATION: National Research Ethic Committee approved this study on 4 July 2017 (17/WM/0239). The first site opened to recruitment 9 October 2017. The results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15537280; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6303686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63036862019-01-04 Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial Kearney, Rebecca Samantha McKeown, Rebecca Stevens, Siobhan Parsons, Nicholas Parsons, Helen Wells, Philip Brown, Jaclyn Underwood, Martin Redmond, Anthony Mason, James Costa, Matthew L BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Each year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow early movement. This paper details the protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of plaster cast immobilisation versus functional bracing for patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit adults with a fractured ankle, for which the treating clinician would consider plaster cast to be a reasonable management option. Randomisation will be on a 1:1 basis, stratified by centre, operative or non-operative management and age. Participants will be allocated to either plaster cast or a functional brace, both treatments are widely used. To have 90% power to detect a difference of 10 points on the primary outcome (Olerud and Molander Ankle Score) at the primary outcome time point (16 weeks), we need to randomise a minimum of 478 people. Quality of life and resource use will be collected at 6, 10, 16, 24 weeks and 12, 18, 24 months. The differences between treatment groups will be assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The economic evaluation will adhere to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reference case. ETHICS, REGISTRATION AND DISSEMINATION: National Research Ethic Committee approved this study on 4 July 2017 (17/WM/0239). The first site opened to recruitment 9 October 2017. The results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15537280; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6303686/ /pubmed/30567826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027242 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Kearney, Rebecca Samantha McKeown, Rebecca Stevens, Siobhan Parsons, Nicholas Parsons, Helen Wells, Philip Brown, Jaclyn Underwood, Martin Redmond, Anthony Mason, James Costa, Matthew L Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial |
title | Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial |
title_full | Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial |
title_short | Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial |
title_sort | cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the uk study of ankle injury rehabilitation (air) multicentre randomised trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kearneyrebeccasamantha castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT mckeownrebecca castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT stevenssiobhan castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT parsonsnicholas castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT parsonshelen castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT wellsphilip castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT brownjaclyn castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT underwoodmartin castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT redmondanthony castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT masonjames castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial AT costamatthewl castversusfunctionalbraceintherehabilitationofpatientstreatedforananklefractureprotocolfortheukstudyofankleinjuryrehabilitationairmulticentrerandomisedtrial |