Cargando…

No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition

The sexy‐sperm hypothesis posits that polyandrous females derive an indirect fitness benefit from multi‐male mating because they increase the probability their eggs are fertilized by males whose sperm have high fertilizing efficiency, which is assumed to be heritable and conferred on their sons. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hook, Kristin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4626
_version_ 1783382227282821120
author Hook, Kristin A.
author_facet Hook, Kristin A.
author_sort Hook, Kristin A.
collection PubMed
description The sexy‐sperm hypothesis posits that polyandrous females derive an indirect fitness benefit from multi‐male mating because they increase the probability their eggs are fertilized by males whose sperm have high fertilizing efficiency, which is assumed to be heritable and conferred on their sons. However, whether this process occurs is contentious because father‐to‐son heritability may be constrained by the genetic architecture underlying traits important in sperm competition within certain species. Previous empirical work has revealed such genetic constraints in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus, a model system in sperm competition studies in which female multi‐male mating is ubiquitous. Using the seed beetle, I tested a critical prediction of the sexy‐sperm hypothesis that polyandrous females produce sons that are on average more successful under sperm competition than sons from monandrous females. Contrary to the prediction of the sexy‐sperm hypothesis, I found that sons from monandrous females had significantly higher relative paternity in competitive double matings. Moreover, post hoc analyses revealed that these sons produced significantly larger ejaculates when second to mate, despite being smaller. This study is the first to provide empirical evidence for post‐copulatory processes favoring monandrous sons and discusses potential explanations for the unexpected bias in paternity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63037472018-12-31 No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition Hook, Kristin A. Ecol Evol Original Research The sexy‐sperm hypothesis posits that polyandrous females derive an indirect fitness benefit from multi‐male mating because they increase the probability their eggs are fertilized by males whose sperm have high fertilizing efficiency, which is assumed to be heritable and conferred on their sons. However, whether this process occurs is contentious because father‐to‐son heritability may be constrained by the genetic architecture underlying traits important in sperm competition within certain species. Previous empirical work has revealed such genetic constraints in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus, a model system in sperm competition studies in which female multi‐male mating is ubiquitous. Using the seed beetle, I tested a critical prediction of the sexy‐sperm hypothesis that polyandrous females produce sons that are on average more successful under sperm competition than sons from monandrous females. Contrary to the prediction of the sexy‐sperm hypothesis, I found that sons from monandrous females had significantly higher relative paternity in competitive double matings. Moreover, post hoc analyses revealed that these sons produced significantly larger ejaculates when second to mate, despite being smaller. This study is the first to provide empirical evidence for post‐copulatory processes favoring monandrous sons and discusses potential explanations for the unexpected bias in paternity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6303747/ /pubmed/30598772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4626 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hook, Kristin A.
No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
title No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
title_full No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
title_fullStr No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
title_full_unstemmed No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
title_short No support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
title_sort no support for the sexy‐sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: sons of monandrous females fare better in post‐copulatory competition
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4626
work_keys_str_mv AT hookkristina nosupportforthesexyspermhypothesisintheseedbeetlesonsofmonandrousfemalesfarebetterinpostcopulatorycompetition