Cargando…

Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming

BACKGROUND: Both human and mouse fibroblasts can be reprogrammed to pluripotency with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) transcription factors. While both systems generate pluripotency, human reprogramming takes considerably longer than mouse. RESULTS: To assess additional similarities and differenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Kai, Chronis, Constantinos, Soufi, Abdenour, Bonora, Giancarlo, Edwards, Miguel, Smale, Stephen T., Zaret, Kenneth S., Plath, Kathrin, Pellegrini, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5326-1
_version_ 1783382246111051776
author Fu, Kai
Chronis, Constantinos
Soufi, Abdenour
Bonora, Giancarlo
Edwards, Miguel
Smale, Stephen T.
Zaret, Kenneth S.
Plath, Kathrin
Pellegrini, Matteo
author_facet Fu, Kai
Chronis, Constantinos
Soufi, Abdenour
Bonora, Giancarlo
Edwards, Miguel
Smale, Stephen T.
Zaret, Kenneth S.
Plath, Kathrin
Pellegrini, Matteo
author_sort Fu, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both human and mouse fibroblasts can be reprogrammed to pluripotency with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) transcription factors. While both systems generate pluripotency, human reprogramming takes considerably longer than mouse. RESULTS: To assess additional similarities and differences, we sought to compare the binding of the reprogramming factors between the two systems. In human fibroblasts, the OSK factors initially target many more closed chromatin sites compared to mouse. Despite this difference, the intra- and intergenic distribution of target sites, target genes, primary binding motifs, and combinatorial binding patterns between the reprogramming factors are largely shared. However, while many OSKM binding events in early mouse cell reprogramming occur in syntenic regions, only a limited number is conserved in human. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest similar general effects of OSKM binding across these two species, even though the detailed regulatory networks have diverged significantly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5326-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63038732018-12-31 Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming Fu, Kai Chronis, Constantinos Soufi, Abdenour Bonora, Giancarlo Edwards, Miguel Smale, Stephen T. Zaret, Kenneth S. Plath, Kathrin Pellegrini, Matteo BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Both human and mouse fibroblasts can be reprogrammed to pluripotency with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) transcription factors. While both systems generate pluripotency, human reprogramming takes considerably longer than mouse. RESULTS: To assess additional similarities and differences, we sought to compare the binding of the reprogramming factors between the two systems. In human fibroblasts, the OSK factors initially target many more closed chromatin sites compared to mouse. Despite this difference, the intra- and intergenic distribution of target sites, target genes, primary binding motifs, and combinatorial binding patterns between the reprogramming factors are largely shared. However, while many OSKM binding events in early mouse cell reprogramming occur in syntenic regions, only a limited number is conserved in human. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest similar general effects of OSKM binding across these two species, even though the detailed regulatory networks have diverged significantly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5326-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6303873/ /pubmed/30577748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5326-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fu, Kai
Chronis, Constantinos
Soufi, Abdenour
Bonora, Giancarlo
Edwards, Miguel
Smale, Stephen T.
Zaret, Kenneth S.
Plath, Kathrin
Pellegrini, Matteo
Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming
title Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming
title_full Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming
title_fullStr Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming
title_short Comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early iPSC reprogramming
title_sort comparison of reprogramming factor targets reveals both species-specific and conserved mechanisms in early ipsc reprogramming
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5326-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fukai comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT chronisconstantinos comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT soufiabdenour comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT bonoragiancarlo comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT edwardsmiguel comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT smalestephent comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT zaretkenneths comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT plathkathrin comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming
AT pellegrinimatteo comparisonofreprogrammingfactortargetsrevealsbothspeciesspecificandconservedmechanismsinearlyipscreprogramming