Cargando…

Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery

BACKGROUND: There are no universally accepted protocols for the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection. This study retrospectively evaluates the methods of aggressive debridement with instrumentation retention, high vacuum closed-suction drain without irrigation, primary wound closure,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Dong, Liu, Bin, Chang, Yunbing, Gu, Honglin, Zheng, Xiaoqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0458-4
_version_ 1783382274796945408
author Yin, Dong
Liu, Bin
Chang, Yunbing
Gu, Honglin
Zheng, Xiaoqing
author_facet Yin, Dong
Liu, Bin
Chang, Yunbing
Gu, Honglin
Zheng, Xiaoqing
author_sort Yin, Dong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no universally accepted protocols for the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection. This study retrospectively evaluates the methods of aggressive debridement with instrumentation retention, high vacuum closed-suction drain without irrigation, primary wound closure, and antibiotic therapy for the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 4057 patients who underwent instrumented spinal surgeries were surveyed from January 2010 to June 2014. Surgical debridement was performed immediately after late-onset deep surgical site infection was identified. In addition to extended resection of the devitalized and necrotic tissue, the biofilms adhered to the surface of implants were removed meticulously and thoroughly. Primary wound closure was performed on each patient, and closed suction drains were maintained for about 7–10 days without irrigation. Antibiotic therapy was administered for 3 months according to the results of the pathogenic culture. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified as having late-onset deep surgical site infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in this group. Seven patients with late-onset deep surgical site infection had negative bacterial culture results. Infections resolved in all patients. Forty-one patients retained their instrumentation, whereas 1 patient had the implants removed because of Staphylococcus aureus infection, which was found the implants loosening during debridement. Primary wound healing was found in all patients with no recurrence of infection during the follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: A timely diagnosis, aggressive and meticulous debridement, high vacuum closed-suction drain, routine and adequate use of antibacterial agents are the keys to successfully resolving infection and keeping implants retention in the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6303994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63039942019-01-03 Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery Yin, Dong Liu, Bin Chang, Yunbing Gu, Honglin Zheng, Xiaoqing BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: There are no universally accepted protocols for the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection. This study retrospectively evaluates the methods of aggressive debridement with instrumentation retention, high vacuum closed-suction drain without irrigation, primary wound closure, and antibiotic therapy for the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 4057 patients who underwent instrumented spinal surgeries were surveyed from January 2010 to June 2014. Surgical debridement was performed immediately after late-onset deep surgical site infection was identified. In addition to extended resection of the devitalized and necrotic tissue, the biofilms adhered to the surface of implants were removed meticulously and thoroughly. Primary wound closure was performed on each patient, and closed suction drains were maintained for about 7–10 days without irrigation. Antibiotic therapy was administered for 3 months according to the results of the pathogenic culture. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified as having late-onset deep surgical site infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in this group. Seven patients with late-onset deep surgical site infection had negative bacterial culture results. Infections resolved in all patients. Forty-one patients retained their instrumentation, whereas 1 patient had the implants removed because of Staphylococcus aureus infection, which was found the implants loosening during debridement. Primary wound healing was found in all patients with no recurrence of infection during the follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: A timely diagnosis, aggressive and meticulous debridement, high vacuum closed-suction drain, routine and adequate use of antibacterial agents are the keys to successfully resolving infection and keeping implants retention in the treatment of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery. BioMed Central 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6303994/ /pubmed/30577832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0458-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yin, Dong
Liu, Bin
Chang, Yunbing
Gu, Honglin
Zheng, Xiaoqing
Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
title Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
title_full Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
title_fullStr Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
title_short Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
title_sort management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6303994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0458-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yindong managementoflateonsetdeepsurgicalsiteinfectionafterinstrumentedspinalsurgery
AT liubin managementoflateonsetdeepsurgicalsiteinfectionafterinstrumentedspinalsurgery
AT changyunbing managementoflateonsetdeepsurgicalsiteinfectionafterinstrumentedspinalsurgery
AT guhonglin managementoflateonsetdeepsurgicalsiteinfectionafterinstrumentedspinalsurgery
AT zhengxiaoqing managementoflateonsetdeepsurgicalsiteinfectionafterinstrumentedspinalsurgery