Cargando…
Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature
Infrared (IR) thermography, where temperature measurements are made with IR cameras, has proven to be a very useful and widely used tool in biological science. Several thermography parameters are critical to the proper operation of thermal cameras and the accuracy of measurements, and these must usu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181281 |
_version_ | 1783382292716060672 |
---|---|
author | Harrap, Michael J. M. Hempel de Ibarra, Natalie Whitney, Heather M. Rands, Sean A. |
author_facet | Harrap, Michael J. M. Hempel de Ibarra, Natalie Whitney, Heather M. Rands, Sean A. |
author_sort | Harrap, Michael J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infrared (IR) thermography, where temperature measurements are made with IR cameras, has proven to be a very useful and widely used tool in biological science. Several thermography parameters are critical to the proper operation of thermal cameras and the accuracy of measurements, and these must usually be provided to the camera. Failure to account for these parameters may lead to less accurate measurements. Furthermore, the failure to provide information of parameter choices in reports may compromise appraisal of accuracy and replicate studies. In this review, we investigate how well biologists report thermography parameters. This is done through a systematic review of biological thermography literature that included articles published between years 2007 and 2017. We found that in primary biological thermography papers, which make some kind of quantitative temperature measurement, 48% fail to report values used for emissivity (an object's capacity to emit thermal radiation relative to a black body radiator), which is the minimum level of reporting that should take place. This finding highlights the need for life scientists to take into account and report key parameter information when carrying out thermography, in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6304129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63041292019-01-18 Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature Harrap, Michael J. M. Hempel de Ibarra, Natalie Whitney, Heather M. Rands, Sean A. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Infrared (IR) thermography, where temperature measurements are made with IR cameras, has proven to be a very useful and widely used tool in biological science. Several thermography parameters are critical to the proper operation of thermal cameras and the accuracy of measurements, and these must usually be provided to the camera. Failure to account for these parameters may lead to less accurate measurements. Furthermore, the failure to provide information of parameter choices in reports may compromise appraisal of accuracy and replicate studies. In this review, we investigate how well biologists report thermography parameters. This is done through a systematic review of biological thermography literature that included articles published between years 2007 and 2017. We found that in primary biological thermography papers, which make some kind of quantitative temperature measurement, 48% fail to report values used for emissivity (an object's capacity to emit thermal radiation relative to a black body radiator), which is the minimum level of reporting that should take place. This finding highlights the need for life scientists to take into account and report key parameter information when carrying out thermography, in the future. The Royal Society 2018-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6304129/ /pubmed/30662737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181281 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Harrap, Michael J. M. Hempel de Ibarra, Natalie Whitney, Heather M. Rands, Sean A. Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
title | Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
title_full | Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
title_fullStr | Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
title_short | Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
title_sort | reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrapmichaeljm reportingofthermographyparametersinbiologyasystematicreviewofthermalimagingliterature AT hempeldeibarranatalie reportingofthermographyparametersinbiologyasystematicreviewofthermalimagingliterature AT whitneyheatherm reportingofthermographyparametersinbiologyasystematicreviewofthermalimagingliterature AT randsseana reportingofthermographyparametersinbiologyasystematicreviewofthermalimagingliterature |