Cargando…

Stents combined with iodine-125 implantation to treat main portal vein tumor thrombus

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of main portal vein stents combined with iodine-125 ((125)I) to treat main portal vein tumor thrombus. METHODS: From January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2015, 111 patients were diagnosed with liver cancer combined with main portal vein tumor thrombus. They were non-randomly a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yi-Fan, Wang, Tao, Yue, Zhen-Dong, Zhao, Hong-Wei, Wang, Lei, Fan, Zhen-Hua, He, Fu-Liang, Liu, Fu-Quan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i12.496
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of main portal vein stents combined with iodine-125 ((125)I) to treat main portal vein tumor thrombus. METHODS: From January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2015, 111 patients were diagnosed with liver cancer combined with main portal vein tumor thrombus. They were non-randomly assigned to undergo treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)/transarterial embolization (TAE) + portal vein stents combined with (125)I implantation (Group A) and TACE/TAE + portal vein stents only (Group B). After the operation, scheduled follow-up was performed at 6, 12 and 24 mo. The recorded information included clinical manifestations, survival rate, and stent restenosis rate. Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank test and Cox regression were used for data analyses. RESULTS: From January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2015, 54 and 57 patients were allocated to Groups A and B, respectively. The survival rates at 6, 12 and 24 mo were 85.2%, 42.6% and 22.2% in Group A and 50.9%, 10.5% and 0% in Group B. The differences were significant [log rank P < 0.05, hazard ratio (HR): 0.37, 95%CI: 0.24-0.56]. The rates of stent restenosis were 18.5%, 55.6% and 83.3% in Group A and 43.9%, 82.5% and 96.5% in Group B. The differences were significant (log rank P < 0.05, HR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.27-0.63). Cox regression identified that treatment was the only factor affecting survival rate in this study. CONCLUSION: Main portal vein stents combined with (125)I can significantly improve survival rate and reduce the rate of stent restenosis.