Cargando…

Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention

The current experiment examined changes in visual selective attention in young children, older children, young adults, and older adults while participants were instructed to ignore auditory and visual distractors. The aims of the study were to: (a) determine if the Perceptual Load Hypothesis (PLH) (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Christopher W., Hawthorn, Andrew M., Rahman, Arisha N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02564
_version_ 1783382344628961280
author Robinson, Christopher W.
Hawthorn, Andrew M.
Rahman, Arisha N.
author_facet Robinson, Christopher W.
Hawthorn, Andrew M.
Rahman, Arisha N.
author_sort Robinson, Christopher W.
collection PubMed
description The current experiment examined changes in visual selective attention in young children, older children, young adults, and older adults while participants were instructed to ignore auditory and visual distractors. The aims of the study were to: (a) determine if the Perceptual Load Hypothesis (PLH) (distraction greater under low perceptual load) could predict which irrelevant stimuli would disrupt visual selective attention, and (b) if auditory to visual shifts found in modality dominance research could be extended to selective attention tasks. Overall, distractibility decreased with age, with incompatible distractors having larger costs in young and older children than adults. In regard to accuracy, visual distractibility did not differ across age nor load, whereas, auditory interference was more pronounced early in development and correlated with age. Auditory and visual distractors also slowed down responses in young and older children more than adults. Finally, the PLH did not predict performance. Rather, children often showed the opposite pattern, with visual distractors having a greater cost in the high load condition (older children) and auditory distractors having a greater cost in the high load condition (young children). These findings are consistent with research examining the development of modality dominance and shed light on changes in multisensory processing and selective attention across the lifespan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6304370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63043702019-01-07 Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention Robinson, Christopher W. Hawthorn, Andrew M. Rahman, Arisha N. Front Psychol Psychology The current experiment examined changes in visual selective attention in young children, older children, young adults, and older adults while participants were instructed to ignore auditory and visual distractors. The aims of the study were to: (a) determine if the Perceptual Load Hypothesis (PLH) (distraction greater under low perceptual load) could predict which irrelevant stimuli would disrupt visual selective attention, and (b) if auditory to visual shifts found in modality dominance research could be extended to selective attention tasks. Overall, distractibility decreased with age, with incompatible distractors having larger costs in young and older children than adults. In regard to accuracy, visual distractibility did not differ across age nor load, whereas, auditory interference was more pronounced early in development and correlated with age. Auditory and visual distractors also slowed down responses in young and older children more than adults. Finally, the PLH did not predict performance. Rather, children often showed the opposite pattern, with visual distractors having a greater cost in the high load condition (older children) and auditory distractors having a greater cost in the high load condition (young children). These findings are consistent with research examining the development of modality dominance and shed light on changes in multisensory processing and selective attention across the lifespan. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6304370/ /pubmed/30618983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02564 Text en Copyright © 2018 Robinson, Hawthorn and Rahman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Robinson, Christopher W.
Hawthorn, Andrew M.
Rahman, Arisha N.
Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention
title Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention
title_full Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention
title_fullStr Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention
title_full_unstemmed Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention
title_short Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention
title_sort developmental differences in filtering auditory and visual distractors during visual selective attention
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02564
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonchristopherw developmentaldifferencesinfilteringauditoryandvisualdistractorsduringvisualselectiveattention
AT hawthornandrewm developmentaldifferencesinfilteringauditoryandvisualdistractorsduringvisualselectiveattention
AT rahmanarishan developmentaldifferencesinfilteringauditoryandvisualdistractorsduringvisualselectiveattention