Cargando…

Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities

Little is known about people’s risk perception while participating in potentially harmful activities. In a field study conducted in a climbing gym, we investigated how the climbing activity influences climbers’ risk perception and error rates. Based on research on embodiment, we argue that the perce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raue, Martina, Kolodziej, Ronnie, Lermer, Eva, Streicher, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02383
_version_ 1783382355216433152
author Raue, Martina
Kolodziej, Ronnie
Lermer, Eva
Streicher, Bernhard
author_facet Raue, Martina
Kolodziej, Ronnie
Lermer, Eva
Streicher, Bernhard
author_sort Raue, Martina
collection PubMed
description Little is known about people’s risk perception while participating in potentially harmful activities. In a field study conducted in a climbing gym, we investigated how the climbing activity influences climbers’ risk perception and error rates. Based on research on embodiment, we argue that the perception of risks may differ between being in an active state during climbing and being in an inactive state before or after climbing. In addition to subjective risk perception, error rates were observed as an objective measure of behavior that increase the risk for accidents. Experience was included as a potential moderator because indoor climbing is also accessible to inexperienced people. Drawing on the affect heuristic, we hypothesized that experienced climbers are guided by their intuitions, which makes them less susceptible for influences of their physical state when judging climbing risks. Less experienced climbers need to rely more on deliberative thinking and their judgments may be more distorted by the effects of being in an active state. Climbers were asked to judge climbing risks at five points in time (twice before, twice during and once after climbing in a gym). In addition, the amount and type of climbing errors was observed at two points in time during the activity. We recruited 57 participants (32% female) in a large climbing gym in Germany, who were between 18 and 57 years of age. Results show that participants’ perception of climbing risks generally decreased during the activity phase as opposed to the pre-activity phase, while error rates increased. Higher experience was associated with lower risk perception, but also more errors. Further, experience may weaken the influence of physical activity on risk perception. In higher risk sports people have to make important decisions while being active. Our results suggest that especially climbers need to be aware that being physically active can distort their risk perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6304416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63044162019-01-07 Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities Raue, Martina Kolodziej, Ronnie Lermer, Eva Streicher, Bernhard Front Psychol Psychology Little is known about people’s risk perception while participating in potentially harmful activities. In a field study conducted in a climbing gym, we investigated how the climbing activity influences climbers’ risk perception and error rates. Based on research on embodiment, we argue that the perception of risks may differ between being in an active state during climbing and being in an inactive state before or after climbing. In addition to subjective risk perception, error rates were observed as an objective measure of behavior that increase the risk for accidents. Experience was included as a potential moderator because indoor climbing is also accessible to inexperienced people. Drawing on the affect heuristic, we hypothesized that experienced climbers are guided by their intuitions, which makes them less susceptible for influences of their physical state when judging climbing risks. Less experienced climbers need to rely more on deliberative thinking and their judgments may be more distorted by the effects of being in an active state. Climbers were asked to judge climbing risks at five points in time (twice before, twice during and once after climbing in a gym). In addition, the amount and type of climbing errors was observed at two points in time during the activity. We recruited 57 participants (32% female) in a large climbing gym in Germany, who were between 18 and 57 years of age. Results show that participants’ perception of climbing risks generally decreased during the activity phase as opposed to the pre-activity phase, while error rates increased. Higher experience was associated with lower risk perception, but also more errors. Further, experience may weaken the influence of physical activity on risk perception. In higher risk sports people have to make important decisions while being active. Our results suggest that especially climbers need to be aware that being physically active can distort their risk perception. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6304416/ /pubmed/30618903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02383 Text en Copyright © 2018 Raue, Kolodziej, Lermer and Streicher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Raue, Martina
Kolodziej, Ronnie
Lermer, Eva
Streicher, Bernhard
Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities
title Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities
title_full Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities
title_fullStr Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities
title_full_unstemmed Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities
title_short Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities
title_sort risks seem low while climbing high: shift in risk perception and error rates in the course of indoor climbing activities
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02383
work_keys_str_mv AT rauemartina risksseemlowwhileclimbinghighshiftinriskperceptionanderrorratesinthecourseofindoorclimbingactivities
AT kolodziejronnie risksseemlowwhileclimbinghighshiftinriskperceptionanderrorratesinthecourseofindoorclimbingactivities
AT lermereva risksseemlowwhileclimbinghighshiftinriskperceptionanderrorratesinthecourseofindoorclimbingactivities
AT streicherbernhard risksseemlowwhileclimbinghighshiftinriskperceptionanderrorratesinthecourseofindoorclimbingactivities