Cargando…

Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets

OBJECTIVE: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sfondrini, Maria Francesca, Gandini, Paola, Castroflorio, Tommaso, Garino, Francesco, Mergati, Luca, D'Anca, Krizia, Trovati, Federico, Scribante, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821
_version_ 1783382369450852352
author Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Gandini, Paola
Castroflorio, Tommaso
Garino, Francesco
Mergati, Luca
D'Anca, Krizia
Trovati, Federico
Scribante, Andrea
author_facet Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Gandini, Paola
Castroflorio, Tommaso
Garino, Francesco
Mergati, Luca
D'Anca, Krizia
Trovati, Federico
Scribante, Andrea
author_sort Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incisors in patients treated with three different orthodontic techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conventional brackets (Victory, 3M), self-ligating appliances (Damon Q, Ormco), and aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology) were tested. Cephalometric data of 25 patients with similar skeletal and dental pretreatment parameters were collected for each technique. Position changes of upper central incisors were assessed with radiographic evaluation before and after therapy. Three different parameters were considered: 11(∧)SnaSnp, 11(∧)Ocl and I+ TVL. All variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment and their variation over treatment was assessed. RESULTS: When evaluating angular measurements, 11(∧)SnaSnp and 11(∧)Ocl angles showed the highest numeric variation with conventional brackets. Lowest values were reported with aligners. However, the differences among various techniques were not significant for both angles (P>0.05). Also I+ TVL linear value variation did not show significant differences among the different groups tested (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Conventional multibrackets appliance showed the highest incisal position variations over treatment, but the differences among various groups were not significantly different.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6304479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63044792019-01-09 Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Castroflorio, Tommaso Garino, Francesco Mergati, Luca D'Anca, Krizia Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incisors in patients treated with three different orthodontic techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conventional brackets (Victory, 3M), self-ligating appliances (Damon Q, Ormco), and aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology) were tested. Cephalometric data of 25 patients with similar skeletal and dental pretreatment parameters were collected for each technique. Position changes of upper central incisors were assessed with radiographic evaluation before and after therapy. Three different parameters were considered: 11(∧)SnaSnp, 11(∧)Ocl and I+ TVL. All variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment and their variation over treatment was assessed. RESULTS: When evaluating angular measurements, 11(∧)SnaSnp and 11(∧)Ocl angles showed the highest numeric variation with conventional brackets. Lowest values were reported with aligners. However, the differences among various techniques were not significant for both angles (P>0.05). Also I+ TVL linear value variation did not show significant differences among the different groups tested (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Conventional multibrackets appliance showed the highest incisal position variations over treatment, but the differences among various groups were not significantly different. Hindawi 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6304479/ /pubmed/30627583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821 Text en Copyright © 2018 Maria Francesca Sfondrini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Gandini, Paola
Castroflorio, Tommaso
Garino, Francesco
Mergati, Luca
D'Anca, Krizia
Trovati, Federico
Scribante, Andrea
Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
title Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
title_full Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
title_fullStr Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
title_full_unstemmed Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
title_short Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
title_sort buccolingual inclination control of upper central incisors of aligners: a comparison with conventional and self-ligating brackets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821
work_keys_str_mv AT sfondrinimariafrancesca buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT gandinipaola buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT castrofloriotommaso buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT garinofrancesco buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT mergatiluca buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT dancakrizia buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT trovatifederico buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets
AT scribanteandrea buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets