Cargando…
Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
OBJECTIVE: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821 |
_version_ | 1783382369450852352 |
---|---|
author | Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Castroflorio, Tommaso Garino, Francesco Mergati, Luca D'Anca, Krizia Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea |
author_facet | Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Castroflorio, Tommaso Garino, Francesco Mergati, Luca D'Anca, Krizia Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea |
author_sort | Sfondrini, Maria Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incisors in patients treated with three different orthodontic techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conventional brackets (Victory, 3M), self-ligating appliances (Damon Q, Ormco), and aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology) were tested. Cephalometric data of 25 patients with similar skeletal and dental pretreatment parameters were collected for each technique. Position changes of upper central incisors were assessed with radiographic evaluation before and after therapy. Three different parameters were considered: 11(∧)SnaSnp, 11(∧)Ocl and I+ TVL. All variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment and their variation over treatment was assessed. RESULTS: When evaluating angular measurements, 11(∧)SnaSnp and 11(∧)Ocl angles showed the highest numeric variation with conventional brackets. Lowest values were reported with aligners. However, the differences among various techniques were not significant for both angles (P>0.05). Also I+ TVL linear value variation did not show significant differences among the different groups tested (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Conventional multibrackets appliance showed the highest incisal position variations over treatment, but the differences among various groups were not significantly different. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6304479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63044792019-01-09 Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Castroflorio, Tommaso Garino, Francesco Mergati, Luca D'Anca, Krizia Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incisors in patients treated with three different orthodontic techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conventional brackets (Victory, 3M), self-ligating appliances (Damon Q, Ormco), and aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology) were tested. Cephalometric data of 25 patients with similar skeletal and dental pretreatment parameters were collected for each technique. Position changes of upper central incisors were assessed with radiographic evaluation before and after therapy. Three different parameters were considered: 11(∧)SnaSnp, 11(∧)Ocl and I+ TVL. All variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment and their variation over treatment was assessed. RESULTS: When evaluating angular measurements, 11(∧)SnaSnp and 11(∧)Ocl angles showed the highest numeric variation with conventional brackets. Lowest values were reported with aligners. However, the differences among various techniques were not significant for both angles (P>0.05). Also I+ TVL linear value variation did not show significant differences among the different groups tested (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Conventional multibrackets appliance showed the highest incisal position variations over treatment, but the differences among various groups were not significantly different. Hindawi 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6304479/ /pubmed/30627583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821 Text en Copyright © 2018 Maria Francesca Sfondrini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Castroflorio, Tommaso Garino, Francesco Mergati, Luca D'Anca, Krizia Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets |
title | Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets |
title_full | Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets |
title_fullStr | Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets |
title_full_unstemmed | Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets |
title_short | Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets |
title_sort | buccolingual inclination control of upper central incisors of aligners: a comparison with conventional and self-ligating brackets |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sfondrinimariafrancesca buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT gandinipaola buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT castrofloriotommaso buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT garinofrancesco buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT mergatiluca buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT dancakrizia buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT trovatifederico buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets AT scribanteandrea buccolingualinclinationcontrolofuppercentralincisorsofalignersacomparisonwithconventionalandselfligatingbrackets |